<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//TaxonX//DTD Taxonomic Treatment Publishing DTD v0 20100105//EN" "../../nlm/tax-treatment-NS0.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:tp="http://www.plazi.org/taxpub" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">87</journal-id>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="index">urn:lsid:arphahub.com:pub:A116C711-4C18-5A38-8F1E-5E97753A8A64</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title xml:lang="en">Folia Medica</journal-title>
        <abbrev-journal-title xml:lang="en">FM</abbrev-journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">0204-8043</issn>
      <issn pub-type="epub">1314-2143</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Plovdiv Medical University</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3897/folmed.66.e119570</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">119570</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Original Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="scientific_subject">
          <subject>Radiology &amp; Imaging</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>The incidence of breast cancer in Egyptian females in correlation to different mammographic ACR densities</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group content-type="authors">
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Salem</surname>
            <given-names>Marwa Ramzy Hamdy</given-names>
          </name>
          <email xlink:type="simple">marwa.r.h.s20@gmail.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Chalabi</surname>
            <given-names>Nivine Abdel Moneim Tewfik</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Mohammed</surname>
            <given-names>Azza Abdel Ghaffer Boraei</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Yacoub</surname>
            <given-names>George Ezzat Elkess</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="A1">
        <label>1</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt</addr-line>
        <institution>Ain Shams University</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Cairo</addr-line>
        <country>Egypt</country>
      </aff>
      <author-notes>
        <fn fn-type="corresp">
          <p>Corresponding author: Marwa Salem, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt; Email: <email xlink:type="simple">marwa.r.h.s20@gmail.com</email>; Tel.: +20 1097025153</p>
        </fn>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="collection">
        <year>2024</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>30</day>
        <month>04</month>
        <year>2024</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>66</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>213</fpage>
      <lpage>220</lpage>
      <uri content-type="arpha" xlink:href="http://openbiodiv.net/A8330956-23A8-5A92-8301-96A8B4CEA1FE">A8330956-23A8-5A92-8301-96A8B4CEA1FE</uri>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>25</day>
          <month>01</month>
          <year>2024</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>30</day>
          <month>03</month>
          <year>2024</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Marwa Ramzy Hamdy Salem, Nivine Abdel Moneim Tewfik Chalabi, Azza Abdel Ghaffer Boraei Mohammed, George Ezzat Elkess Yacoub</copyright-statement>
        <license license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple">
          <license-p>This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <abstract>
        <label>Abstract</label>
        <p><bold>Introduction</bold>: The density of breast tissue, radiologically referred to as fibroglandular mammary tissue, was found to be a predisposing factor for breast cancer (<abbrev xlink:title="breast cancer" id="ABBRID0E2D">BC</abbrev>). However, the stated degree of elevated <abbrev xlink:title="breast cancer" id="ABBRID0E6D">BC</abbrev> risk varies widely in the literature.</p>
        <p><bold>Aim</bold>: The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between different breast mammography densities and the risk of breast cancer in Egyptian women..</p>
        <p><bold>Patients and methods</bold>: An analytical cross-sectional prospective study was conducted at Ain Shams University Hospital and Private Centre between December 2020 and December 2021. The study included 814 asymptomatic females 40 years old or above, who came for <abbrev xlink:title="breast cancer" id="ABBRID0ELE">BC</abbrev> screening using full-field digital mammography.</p>
        <p><bold>Results</bold>: The incidence of <abbrev xlink:title="breast cancer" id="ABBRID0ETE">BC</abbrev> was found in 84 females (10.3%). Breast cancer incidence was 6.3% in females with <abbrev xlink:title="excessively fatty" id="ABBRID0EXE">ACR-A</abbrev> density, 8.5% in women with <abbrev xlink:title="dispersed density" id="ABBRID0E2E">ACR-B</abbrev> density, 16.3% in women with <abbrev xlink:title="heterogeneous density" id="ABBRID0E6E">ACR-C</abbrev> density, and 27.8% in women with <abbrev xlink:title="extremely dense" id="ABBRID0EDF">ACR-D</abbrev> density (<italic>p</italic>&lt;0.001). Using logistic regression analysis, we showed that three types of breast density increased the risk of <abbrev xlink:title="breast cancer" id="ABBRID0EJF">BC</abbrev>, where patients with type B, type C, and type D breast density had a 1.39, 2.92, and 3.12 times more risk for <abbrev xlink:title="breast cancer" id="ABBRID0ENF">BC</abbrev>, respectively (<italic>p</italic>=0.010, <italic>p</italic>=0.003, and <italic>p</italic>=0.036, respectively).</p>
        <p><bold>Conclusion</bold>: Among Egyptian females, the incidence of <abbrev xlink:title="breast cancer" id="ABBRID0E2F">BC</abbrev> is 10.3%. Our data revealed that the greater the breast density, the higher the incidence of <abbrev xlink:title="breast cancer" id="ABBRID0E6F">BC</abbrev>, and affirmed that breast density is a risk factor for <abbrev xlink:title="breast cancer" id="ABBRID0EDG">BC</abbrev> development.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <label>Keywords</label>
        <kwd>breast cancer</kwd>
        <kwd>breast density</kwd>
        <kwd>mammography</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
    <notes>
      <sec sec-type="Citation" id="SECID0ENG">
        <title>Citation</title>
        <p>Salem MRH, Chalabi NAMT, Mohammed AACBM, Yacoub GEE. The incidence of breast cancer in Egyptian females in correlation to different mammographic ACR densities. Folia Med (Plovdiv) 2024;66(2):213-220. doi: <ext-link xlink:type="simple" ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.3897/folmed.66.e119570">10.3897/folmed.66.e119570</ext-link>.</p>
      </sec>
    </notes>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec sec-type="Introduction" id="SECID0EZG">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Breast cancer is a malignant tumor that originates in the cells of the breast tissue. It is the most common cancer in women worldwide, accounting for 24.2% of all cancer cases among women. According to the latest World Health Organization statistics, there were an estimated 2.3 million new cases of breast cancer in 2020; it is the second leading cause of cancer death in women after lung cancer. The risk of developing breast cancer increases with age, and most cases occur in women over the age of 50.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>]</sup></p>
      <p>The presence of breast cancer can be detected through various methods, including mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). If breast cancer is suspected, a biopsy may be performed to remove a sample of tissue for further examination.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>]</sup></p>
      <p>The mortality rate of breast cancer varies depending on the stage at diagnosis and the availability of treatment. According to the American Cancer Society, the 5-year relative survival rate for women with breast cancer is 90%. However, this rate drops significantly for women with advanced stage breast cancer.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>]</sup></p>
      <p>Recent statistics show that the incidence of breast cancer is increasing worldwide. This is thought to be due to a combination of factors, including increased awareness and screening, as well as changes in reproductive and lifestyle factors. However, mortality rates have been decreasing in many countries due to improvements in early detection and treatment.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>]</sup></p>
      <p>Despite these advances, breast cancer remains a significant public health concern. According to the WHO, there were an estimated 685, 000 deaths from breast cancer worldwide in 2020. Continued research and investment in prevention, early detection, and treatment are essential to reducing the burden of this disease.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>]</sup></p>
      <p>A large Egyptian systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that <abbrev xlink:title="breast cancer" id="ABBRID0EMAAC">BC</abbrev> was the most common cancer, accounting for 42% of all cancer cases in Egyptian females, with the majority presenting in advanced stages.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>]</sup></p>
      <p>The World Health Organization’s principal objective is to reduce the <abbrev xlink:title="breast cancer" id="ABBRID0EYAAC">BC</abbrev>-related burden and <abbrev xlink:title="breast cancer" id="ABBRID0E3AAC">BC</abbrev>-related mortality which is suggested to be achieved by early detection and proper management of <abbrev xlink:title="breast cancer" id="ABBRID0EABAC">BC</abbrev>.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>]</sup></p>
      <p><abbrev xlink:title="breast cancer" id="ABBRID0EMBAC">BC</abbrev> screening contributes considerably to the early detection of asymptomatic cancer, which leads to less intrusive therapies and better outcomes since the disease is found before the progression of the tumor. The most effective imaging method that is still advised for all women to use for <abbrev xlink:title="breast cancer" id="ABBRID0EQBAC">BC</abbrev> screening is mammography.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>]</sup></p>
      <p>Accordingly, a number of nations have put in place national programs for <abbrev xlink:title="breast cancer" id="ABBRID0E3BAC">BC</abbrev> screening, wherein women undergo routine mammography screenings. Women between the ages of 50 and 69 are screened in the majority of nations since it is thought that they are the most suitable population to gain advantages from this screening.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>]</sup></p>
      <p>The density of breast tissue, radiologically referred to as fibroglandular mammary tissue, was found to be a risk factor for <abbrev xlink:title="breast cancer" id="ABBRID0EICAC">BC</abbrev> in the early twentieth century. It was reported that dense breasts were more likely to develop <abbrev xlink:title="breast cancer" id="ABBRID0EMCAC">BC</abbrev> than fatty breasts.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>]</sup> However, the stated degree of elevated <abbrev xlink:title="breast cancer" id="ABBRID0EXCAC">BC</abbrev> risk varies widely in the literature, from a one- to a six-fold greater risk.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>]</sup></p>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Aim" id="SECID0EJDAC">
      <title>Aim</title>
      <p>The present study aims to detect the relationship between different breast mammographic densities and the risk for <abbrev xlink:title="breast cancer" id="ABBRID0EPDAC">BC</abbrev> in Egyptian females.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Design" id="SECID0ETDAC">
      <title>Design</title>
      <p>Analytical cross-sectional prospective study.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="methods" id="SECID0EYDAC">
      <title>Patients and methods</title>
      <p>Asymptomatic females who are 40 years of age or older and eligible for screening mammography were included in the study which was approved by the institutional Ethics Committee.</p>
      <p>The study included 814 asymptomatic females who came for <abbrev xlink:title="breast cancer" id="ABBRID0E6DAC">BC</abbrev> screening. After the study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the university, asymptomatic females of 40 years of age or older who were eligible for screening mammography were included into our study. Any female who was contraindicated for mammography was excluded, such as a pregnant female or a female under the age of 40, for whom ultrasound (US) is the preferred method.</p>
      <p>All females were submitted to demographic and clinical data collection and imaging procedures using full-field digital mammography, a device developed by GE Healthcare (Senographe 2000 D full-field digital mammography Essential GE Healthcare). For all patients, two standard views medio-lateral-oblique (<abbrev xlink:title="medio-lateral-oblique" id="ABBRID0EFEAC">MLO</abbrev>) and cranio-caudal (<abbrev xlink:title="cranio-caudal" id="ABBRID0EJEAC">CC</abbrev>) views were obtained.</p>
      <p>Then, according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (BI-RADS) Atlas 5th Edition 2013<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>]</sup>, all females were classified into four density categories based on mammographic findings: excessively fatty (<abbrev xlink:title="excessively fatty" id="ABBRID0EWEAC">ACR-A</abbrev>), dispersed density (<abbrev xlink:title="dispersed density" id="ABBRID0E1EAC">ACR-B</abbrev>), heterogeneous density (<abbrev xlink:title="heterogeneous density" id="ABBRID0E5EAC">ACR-C</abbrev>), and extremely dense (<abbrev xlink:title="extremely dense" id="ABBRID0ECFAC">ACR-D</abbrev>).</p>
      <p>On the basis of the BI-RADS lexicon<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>]</sup>, females were classified as BI-RADs 0 (need additional evaluation), 1 (negative), 2 (benign), 4 (suspicious), and 5 (highly suggestive of malignancy). Patients with BI-RADs 0, 4, and 5 underwent complementary US using GE LOGIQ P6 XD clear (GE health, Chicago, USA), using a high-frequency linear probe (9-12 MHZ) to scan the entire breast and axilla using combined techniques (radial, axial, and longitudinal). Cases with BI-RADs 4 and 5 underwent US-guided biopsy. Patients with BI-RADs 0 were categorized to BI-RADS 3, 4, or 5 according to the result of complementary US.</p>
      <sec sec-type="Statistical analysis" id="SECID0EPFAC">
        <title>Statistical analysis</title>
        <p>The statistical software for social sciences, version 23.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA), was used to analyze the recorded data. The ranges and mean ± standard deviation (SD) were displayed for the quantitative statistics. Additionally, percentages and numbers were used to present qualitative factors. To compare the qualitative data, the chi-square test was applied, and to determine the independence of breast density as a predisposing factor for <abbrev xlink:title="breast cancer" id="ABBRID0EVFAC">BC</abbrev>, multiple logistic regression was used. The confidence interval was set to 95% and the margin of accepted error was agreed to be 5%. Accordingly, <italic>p</italic>-value &lt;0.005 reflects significant results.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Results" id="SECID0E2FAC">
      <title>Results</title>
      <p>Among the 814 females, the age ranged from 40 to 79 years (mean age 53.78±10.22). Most of the females were between 40 to 50 years of age (323 females; 39.7%). According to the BI-RADS 5th edition, <abbrev xlink:title="excessively fatty" id="ABBRID0EBGAC">ACR-A</abbrev> density was found in 176 females (21.6%), <abbrev xlink:title="dispersed density" id="ABBRID0EFGAC">ACR-B</abbrev> density in 424 females (52.1%), <abbrev xlink:title="heterogeneous density" id="ABBRID0EJGAC">ACR-C</abbrev> density in 196 females (24.1%), and <abbrev xlink:title="extremely dense" id="ABBRID0ENGAC">ACR-D</abbrev> density in 18 females (2.2%) <bold>(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1</xref>)</bold>.</p>
      <p>The age of the females and the type of their breast density showed a statistically significant relation (<italic>p</italic>&lt;0.001), where the oldest females were found to have breast density type A (64.34±5.83 years) and the youngest had breast density type D (43.33±4.51 years) <bold>(Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>)</bold>.</p>
      <p>The incidence of <abbrev xlink:title="breast cancer" id="ABBRID0EFHAC">BC</abbrev> was found in 84 females (10.3%). The <abbrev xlink:title="breast cancer" id="ABBRID0EJHAC">BC</abbrev> incidence in females with <abbrev xlink:title="excessively fatty" id="ABBRID0ENHAC">ACR-A</abbrev> was 6.3%, <abbrev xlink:title="dispersed density" id="ABBRID0ERHAC">ACR-B</abbrev> was 8.5%, <abbrev xlink:title="heterogeneous density" id="ABBRID0EVHAC">ACR-C</abbrev> was 16.3% <bold>(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref>)</bold> and <abbrev xlink:title="extremely dense" id="ABBRID0EAIAC">ACR-D</abbrev> was 27.8% <bold>(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref>)</bold> (<italic>p</italic>&lt;0.001) <bold>(Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref>)</bold>.</p>
      <p><bold>Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref></bold> illustrates the case of a 43-year-old woman who underwent routine breast cancer screening through both mammography and ultrasound imaging, revealing high breast density according to the American College of Radiology’s classification system (<abbrev xlink:title="extremely dense" id="ABBRID0E3IAC">ACR-D</abbrev>). <bold>Figs <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2A</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2B</xref></bold> display the mammography images obtained from this examination, with (A) showing a dense, irregular mass located in the upper outer quadrant (UOQ) region of the right breast that is most apparent when viewed from below (<abbrev xlink:title="medio-lateral-oblique" id="ABBRID0EKJAC">MLO</abbrev> position). This finding is further highlighted in <bold>Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2B</xref></bold>, where it appears as an irregular shape with indistinct margins. <bold>Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2C</xref></bold> displays an accompanying ultrasound image, which depicts a similarly shaped, but now hypoechoic and irregular mass situated within the same area. Based on these findings, the radiologist assigned a Bi-RADS assessment score of category 5, indicating a highly suspicious malignancy. Subsequent diagnostic confirmation via US-guided core needle biopsy performed outside the screening context uncovered a pathological diagnosis of invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), classified as grade II based on histopathologic evaluation.</p>
      <p><bold>Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref></bold> depicts a 48-year-old woman who underwent regular breast cancer screenings. During her examinations, we observed elevated levels of dense tissue in her breasts, categorized by the American College of Radiology as type C. We employed mammography with complementary ultrasonography to visualize any potential abnormalities. <bold>Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref></bold> showcase the results of our mammography scans taken during the craniocaudal (<abbrev xlink:title="cranio-caudal" id="ABBRID0EIKAC">CC</abbrev>) and medial-lateral oblique (<abbrev xlink:title="medio-lateral-oblique" id="ABBRID0EMKAC">MLO</abbrev>), respectively, highlighting a partial yet undefined mass formation in the Rt upper inner quadrant (UOQ) zone. Compensatory ultrasound shows hypoechoic irregular mass and ultrasound guided biopsy taken with pathology revealed IDC-II.</p>
      <p>As risk factors for <abbrev xlink:title="breast cancer" id="ABBRID0ESKAC">BC</abbrev>, three types of breast densities increased the risk of <abbrev xlink:title="breast cancer" id="ABBRID0EWKAC">BC</abbrev>, where females with type B breast density had 1.39 times more risk of breast cancer, while type C patients had 2.92 times more risk, and finally, type D females had 3.12 times more risk for breast cancer (<italic>p</italic>=0.010, <italic>p</italic>=0.003, and <italic>p</italic>=0.036, respectively) <bold>(Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref>)</bold>.</p>
      <fig id="F1" position="float" orientation="portrait">
        <object-id content-type="arpha">E54489D4-403D-5EC2-8796-3EB3C3A5249F</object-id>
        <label>Figure 1.</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Pie chart breast density distribution among study group.</p>
        </caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="foliamedica-66-2-e119570-g001.jpg" position="float" orientation="portrait" xlink:type="simple" id="oo_1040082.jpg">
          <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1040082</uri>
        </graphic>
      </fig>
      <table-wrap id="T1" position="float" orientation="portrait">
        <label>Table 1</label>
        <caption>
          <p>. Relation between age of females and their type of breast density (n=814)</p>
        </caption>
        <table id="TID0EIFAE" rules="all">
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Type A</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Type B</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Type C</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Type D</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold><italic>P</italic>-value</bold>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Age (mean ± SD)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">64.34±5.83)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">53.18±7.95</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">45.02±3.72</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">43.33±4.51</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">&lt;0.001* <sup>a</sup></td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
        <table-wrap-foot>
          <fn>
            <p><sup>a</sup> Kruskal-Wallis test</p>
          </fn>
        </table-wrap-foot>
      </table-wrap>
      <table-wrap id="T2" position="float" orientation="portrait">
        <label>Table 2.</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Association between breast density and <abbrev xlink:title="breast cancer" id="ABBRID0EHPAE">BC</abbrev> among study groups (n=814)</p>
        </caption>
        <table id="TID0ERIAE" rules="all">
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="3" colspan="1">
                <bold>Breast density</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="4">
                <bold>Breast cancer</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="2" colspan="2">
                <bold>Total</bold>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="2">
                <bold>Negative</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="2">
                <bold>Positive</bold>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>No.</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">%</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>No.</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">%</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>No.</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">%</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <abbrev xlink:title="excessively fatty" id="ABBRID0EQRAE">ACR-A</abbrev>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">165</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">93.8%</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">11</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">6.3%</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">176</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">100.0%</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <abbrev xlink:title="dispersed density" id="ABBRID0ELSAE">ACR-B</abbrev>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">388</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">91.5%</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">36</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">8.5%</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">424</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">100.0%</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <abbrev xlink:title="heterogeneous density" id="ABBRID0EGTAE">ACR-C</abbrev>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">164</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">83.7%</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">32</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">16.3%</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">196</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">100.0%</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <abbrev xlink:title="extremely dense" id="ABBRID0EBUAE">ACR-D</abbrev>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">13</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">72.2%</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">5</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">27.8%</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">18</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">100.0%</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Total</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">730</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">89.7%</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">84</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">10.3%</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">814</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">100.0%</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Chi-square test</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="6">18.252</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">p-value</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="6">&lt;0.001**</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
        <table-wrap-foot>
          <fn>
            <p>χ<sup>2</sup>: chi-square test for number (%). **<italic>p</italic>-value &lt;0.001 is highly significant</p>
          </fn>
        </table-wrap-foot>
      </table-wrap>
      <fig id="F2" position="float" orientation="portrait">
        <object-id content-type="arpha">9720C015-81EF-5210-9020-EB84457D73C8</object-id>
        <label>Figure 2.</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Detection of highly suspicious mass lesions in a patient with <abbrev xlink:title="heterogeneous density" id="ABBRID0ELWAE">ACR-C</abbrev> breast density using mammography and ultrasound imaging biopsy revealed IDC-II.</p>
        </caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="foliamedica-66-2-e119570-g002.jpg" position="float" orientation="portrait" xlink:type="simple" id="oo_1040083.jpg">
          <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1040083</uri>
        </graphic>
      </fig>
      <table-wrap id="T3" position="float" orientation="portrait">
        <label>Table 3.</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Logistic regression for the breast density for <abbrev xlink:title="breast cancer" id="ABBRID0E4WAE">BC</abbrev> among the study groups (n=814)</p>
        </caption>
        <table id="TID0EGSAE" rules="all">
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Characteristics</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>OR<sup>a</sup></bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>CI</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold><italic>P</italic> value</bold>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Type-A</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.54</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.740 – 19.125</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.068</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Type-B</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.39</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.399 – 12.286</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.010*</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Type-C</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">2.92</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.323 – 3.410</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.003*</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Type-D</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">3.12</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.169 – 1.522</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.036*</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
        <table-wrap-foot>
          <fn>
            <p><sup>a</sup> Multiple logistic regression</p>
          </fn>
        </table-wrap-foot>
      </table-wrap>
      <fig id="F3" position="float" orientation="portrait">
        <object-id content-type="arpha">93F69348-FB92-55E4-8F37-541012BD9943</object-id>
        <label>Figure 3.</label>
        <caption>
          <p>IDC III in a female undergoing routine breast cancer screening with increased dense tissue (<abbrev xlink:title="heterogeneous density" id="ABBRID0EF1AE">ACR-C</abbrev> Type) visualized through mammography images.</p>
        </caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="foliamedica-66-2-e119570-g003.jpg" position="float" orientation="portrait" xlink:type="simple" id="oo_1040084.jpg">
          <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1040084</uri>
        </graphic>
      </fig>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Discussion" id="SECID0EHLAC">
      <title>Discussion</title>
      <p>Currently, the most widely used tool available for clinically categorizing mammographic density is the BI-RADS, which was released in 2013. Four types of breast density are defined by this system: excessively fatty (<abbrev xlink:title="excessively fatty" id="ABBRID0ENLAC">ACR-A</abbrev>), dispersed density (<abbrev xlink:title="dispersed density" id="ABBRID0ERLAC">ACR-B</abbrev>), heterogeneous density (<abbrev xlink:title="heterogeneous density" id="ABBRID0EVLAC">ACR-C</abbrev>), and highly dense (<abbrev xlink:title="extremely dense" id="ABBRID0EZLAC">ACR-D</abbrev>).<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>]</sup> Using BI-RADS 5th edition, we aimed in our study to find the relationship between different breast mammographic densities and risk for <abbrev xlink:title="breast cancer" id="ABBRID0EEMAC">BC</abbrev> in Egyptian females.</p>
      <p>In this work, according to the BI-RADS 5th edition, among women who were screened for <abbrev xlink:title="breast cancer" id="ABBRID0EKMAC">BC</abbrev>, group <abbrev xlink:title="dispersed density" id="ABBRID0EOMAC">ACR-B</abbrev> is the most common type which was consistent with previous works.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>]</sup> We found that more than half of the females were categorized as <abbrev xlink:title="dispersed density" id="ABBRID0E4MAC">ACR-B</abbrev> (52.1%), followed by <abbrev xlink:title="heterogeneous density" id="ABBRID0EBNAC">ACR-C</abbrev> (24.1%), <abbrev xlink:title="excessively fatty" id="ABBRID0EFNAC">ACR-A</abbrev> (21.6%), and <abbrev xlink:title="extremely dense" id="ABBRID0EJNAC">ACR-D</abbrev> (2.2%).</p>
      <p>This was also similar to a previous Egyptian study by Ali and Raafat<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>]</sup> which included 49, 409 women who presented for screening mammography. The study showed that the majority of Egyptian females were categorized as <abbrev xlink:title="dispersed density" id="ABBRID0EWNAC">ACR-B</abbrev> (49%), followed by <abbrev xlink:title="heterogeneous density" id="ABBRID0E1NAC">ACR-C</abbrev>, <abbrev xlink:title="excessively fatty" id="ABBRID0E5NAC">ACR-A</abbrev>, and <abbrev xlink:title="extremely dense" id="ABBRID0ECOAC">ACR-D</abbrev>, representing 49%, 25%, 23%, and 3%, respectively based on the BI-RADS.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>]</sup></p>
      <p>In another Egyptian study by Ahmed et al. that included 40 women with confirmed <abbrev xlink:title="breast cancer" id="ABBRID0EOOAC">BC</abbrev>, based on the BI-RADS 5th edition, more than half of females were categorized as <abbrev xlink:title="dispersed density" id="ABBRID0ESOAC">ACR-B</abbrev> (52.5%), followed by <abbrev xlink:title="heterogeneous density" id="ABBRID0EWOAC">ACR-C</abbrev> (30%), <abbrev xlink:title="excessively fatty" id="ABBRID0E1OAC">ACR-A</abbrev> (15%), and <abbrev xlink:title="extremely dense" id="ABBRID0E5OAC">ACR-D</abbrev> (2.5%).<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>]</sup></p>
      <p>We found an inverse significant relationship regarding the age of the females and the type of their breast density (<italic>p</italic>&lt;0.001), where the oldest females were found to have breast density type A (64.34±5.83 years) and the youngest had breast density type D (43.33±4.51 years). These results agreed with Al-Mousa et al., who concluded that increased breast density on mammography was inversely related to age.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>]</sup></p>
      <p>Likewise, Checka et al. observed a significant inverse relation between female ages and mammographically determined breast density (<italic>p</italic>&lt;0.001); however, they added that age was not a reliable indicator of breast density as they observed a significant percentage of postmenopausal women still having dense breasts on mammography.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>]</sup></p>
      <p>These results contradict the fact that <abbrev xlink:title="breast cancer" id="ABBRID0E5PAC">BC</abbrev> is more frequent among older females and in dense breasts. However, this may be explained by the low mammographic sensitivity in young women with more dense breasts<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>]</sup> which may obscure the early detection of <abbrev xlink:title="breast cancer" id="ABBRID0EKAAE">BC</abbrev> among young females which delays the presenting age. This emphasizes the need for individual-based screening program taking into consideration females’ ages and breast densities.</p>
      <p>In the present study, the incidence of <abbrev xlink:title="breast cancer" id="ABBRID0EQAAE">BC</abbrev> among our population was found in 84 females (10.3%). This was higher than that reported in a recent Egyptian study performed by Ali and Raafat, who found that among 49, 409 women presented for screening mammography 1500 had <abbrev xlink:title="breast cancer" id="ABBRID0EUAAE">BC</abbrev> representing only 3%.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>]</sup> Different sample sizes may be the cause for this variation.</p>
      <p>The <abbrev xlink:title="breast cancer" id="ABBRID0EBBAE">BC</abbrev> incidence in females with <abbrev xlink:title="excessively fatty" id="ABBRID0EFBAE">ACR-A</abbrev> was 6.3%, <abbrev xlink:title="dispersed density" id="ABBRID0EJBAE">ACR-B</abbrev> was 8.5%, <abbrev xlink:title="heterogeneous density" id="ABBRID0ENBAE">ACR-C</abbrev> was 16.3%, and <abbrev xlink:title="extremely dense" id="ABBRID0ERBAE">ACR-D</abbrev> was 27.8% (<italic>p</italic>&lt;0.001), indicating a significant relation between the incidence of <abbrev xlink:title="breast cancer" id="ABBRID0EXBAE">BC</abbrev> and breast density, in which the females with extremely dense breasts (<abbrev xlink:title="extremely dense" id="ABBRID0E2BAE">ACR-D</abbrev>) are more susceptible to develop <abbrev xlink:title="breast cancer" id="ABBRID0E6BAE">BC</abbrev>. This result was confirmed by logistic regression analysis which showed that three types of breast densities increased the risk of <abbrev xlink:title="breast cancer" id="ABBRID0EDCAE">BC</abbrev>, where patients with type B, type C, and type D breast density had a 1.39, 2.92, and 3.12 times more risk for <abbrev xlink:title="breast cancer" id="ABBRID0EHCAE">BC</abbrev>, respectively (<italic>p</italic>=0.010, <italic>p</italic>=0.003, and <italic>p</italic>=0.036, respectively). These findings settle breast density as a predisposing factor for <abbrev xlink:title="breast cancer" id="ABBRID0ERCAE">BC</abbrev> development, showing that the greater the breast density, the higher the incidence of <abbrev xlink:title="breast cancer" id="ABBRID0EVCAE">BC</abbrev>.</p>
      <p>Our findings support the results of many previous studies. Cohort studies have shown a significant correlation between increasing breast mammographic density and the increased incidence of <abbrev xlink:title="breast cancer" id="ABBRID0E2CAE">BC</abbrev> in women.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>]</sup></p>
      <p>As mentioned in our study, Ali and Raafat showed that the incidence of <abbrev xlink:title="breast cancer" id="ABBRID0EPDAE">BC</abbrev> in females with <abbrev xlink:title="extremely dense" id="ABBRID0ETDAE">ACR-D</abbrev> (13.7%) was the highest followed by that in females with <abbrev xlink:title="heterogeneous density" id="ABBRID0EXDAE">ACR-C</abbrev> (3.3%), <abbrev xlink:title="dispersed density" id="ABBRID0E2DAE">ACR-B</abbrev> (2.7%), and <abbrev xlink:title="excessively fatty" id="ABBRID0E6DAE">ACR-A</abbrev> (2.2%).<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>]</sup></p>
      <p>It was demonstrated by Ahmadinjad et al. that <abbrev xlink:title="breast cancer" id="ABBRID0ELEAE">BC</abbrev> growth was more likely to occur in breasts with high densities, more than in breasts with low densities (<italic>p</italic>=0.007).<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>]</sup></p>
      <p>Contrary to our findings, Ahmed et al. reported no relation between <abbrev xlink:title="breast cancer" id="ABBRID0EZEAE">BC</abbrev> and breast density in a study conducted on a total of 40 females who were radiologically and histopathologically diagnosed with <abbrev xlink:title="breast cancer" id="ABBRID0E4EAE">BC</abbrev>. The authors found that the percentage of cases with <abbrev xlink:title="breast cancer" id="ABBRID0EBFAE">BC</abbrev> was the highest among females with intermediate breast density (<abbrev xlink:title="dispersed density" id="ABBRID0EFFAE">ACR-B</abbrev>), then increased with <abbrev xlink:title="heterogeneous density" id="ABBRID0EJFAE">ACR-C</abbrev> and <abbrev xlink:title="excessively fatty" id="ABBRID0ENFAE">ACR-A</abbrev>, respectively, suggesting that dense breast tissue should not be regarded as a risk factor for <abbrev xlink:title="breast cancer" id="ABBRID0ERFAE">BC</abbrev>.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>]</sup></p>
      <p>Also, Kamal et al. studied the role of breast density as one of the <abbrev xlink:title="breast cancer" id="ABBRID0E4FAE">BC</abbrev> risk factors in accordance with menopausal status. In contrast to our findings, they reported that in premenopausal women, breast density was insignificantly related to <abbrev xlink:title="breast cancer" id="ABBRID0EBGAE">BC</abbrev>, whereas breast density showed an inverse significant relationship to <abbrev xlink:title="breast cancer" id="ABBRID0EFGAE">BC</abbrev> in postmenopausal women. After a logistic regression analysis, Kamal et al. found that decreased breast density is a significant independent predisposing factor for <abbrev xlink:title="breast cancer" id="ABBRID0EJGAE">BC</abbrev> (<italic>p</italic>=0.009).<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">19</xref>]</sup></p>
      <p>This discrepancy may be related to some factors, including variations in the breast density assessment technique, adjustments made during the analyses, and, to some extent, variations in the demographics of the population being studied, such as menopausal status, ethnicity, and lifestyle variations; however, these reasons are still debatable.</p>
      <p>The fact that our study is prospective in design and conducted at one of the largest Egyptian centers for <abbrev xlink:title="breast cancer" id="ABBRID0EYGAE">BC</abbrev> screening strengthens our work. However, our study is limited by the relatively small sample size from a single Egyptian center, accordingly, a larger multicentric study is needed to be more representative of the Egyptian female population. Additionally, the study sample was not evenly distributed throughout the ACR and age groups, which might have skewed the findings. Furthermore, the study did not include other parameters that are proposed to be linked to an increased risk of breast density and <abbrev xlink:title="breast cancer" id="ABBRID0E3GAE">BC</abbrev> in the past, such as parity, menopausal status, and hormonal use.</p>
      <p>We acknowledge that these factors should be included in future research. Finally, we did not report the clinical-histopathological data as it was away from our aim.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Conclusion" id="SECID0EBHAE">
      <title>Conclusion</title>
      <p>Among Egyptian females, the incidence of <abbrev xlink:title="breast cancer" id="ABBRID0EHHAE">BC</abbrev> is 10.3%. Females with extremely dense breasts (<abbrev xlink:title="extremely dense" id="ABBRID0ELHAE">ACR-D</abbrev>) are more susceptible to developing <abbrev xlink:title="breast cancer" id="ABBRID0EPHAE">BC</abbrev>. Overall, our data showed that the greater the breast density, the higher the incidence of <abbrev xlink:title="breast cancer" id="ABBRID0ETHAE">BC</abbrev>, and affirmed that breast density is a risk factor for <abbrev xlink:title="breast cancer" id="ABBRID0EXHAE">BC</abbrev> development. We recommended a nationwide comprehensive program for <abbrev xlink:title="breast cancer" id="ABBRID0E2HAE">BC</abbrev> screening in the whole of Egypt not only for the major government and private hospitals and in screening programs, but breast density estimation should also be considered as a tool in <abbrev xlink:title="breast cancer" id="ABBRID0E6HAE">BC</abbrev> prediction.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Conflict of interest" id="SECID0EDIAE">
      <title>Conflict of interest</title>
      <p>None.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Availability of data and materials" id="SECID0EIIAE">
      <title>Availability of data and materials</title>
      <p>Available on request.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Consent for publication" id="SECID0ENIAE">
      <title>Consent for publication</title>
      <p>All authors have approved the manuscript for submission.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Funding" id="SECID0ESIAE">
      <title>Funding</title>
      <p>None.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Author contributions" id="SECID0EXIAE">
      <title>Author contributions</title>
      <p>M.R.H.S.: conceptualization, methodology, data collection, data analysis, manuscript writing; N.A.T.C.: methodology, data collection, data analysis, manuscript writing; A.A.B.M.: data collection, data analysis, manuscript writing; G.E.E.Y.: methodology, data collection, manuscript.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Ethical considerations" id="SECID0E3IAE">
      <title>Ethical considerations</title>
      <p>The study took place at Ain Shams University Hospital and Private Centre in the period from December 2020 to December 2021 after obtaining the preliminary approval of the study protocol and the completion of case collection. The study outcomes were approved by the local Ethics Committee with code FMASU M D 236/2020.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="B1">
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple">1. WHO. Worldwide cancer data. Breast cancer statistics. 2022; Accessed at 15 Jan 2024.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B2">
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple">2. Giaquinto A, Sung H, Miller K, et al. Breast Cancer Statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin 2022; 72(6): 524–41.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B3">
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple">3. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2021; 71(3):209–49.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B4">
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple">4. Azim HA, Elghazawy H, Ghazy RM, et al. Clinicopathologic features of breast cancer in Egypt - contemporary profile and future needs: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JCO Glob Oncol 2023; 9:e2200387.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B5">
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple">5. Fuller MS, Lee CI, Elmore JG. Breast cancer screening: an evidence-based update. Med Clin North Am 2015; 99(3):451–68.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B6">
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple">6. Lauby-Secretan B, Scoccianti C, Loomis D, et al. Breast-cancer screening--viewpoint of the IARC Working Group. N Engl J Med 2015; 372(24):2353–8.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B7">
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple">7. McCormack VA, dos Santos Silva I. Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006; 15(6):1159–69.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B8">
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple">8. Boyd NF. Mammographic density and risk of breast cancer. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2013; 33(1):e57–62.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B9">
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple">9. Bodewes FTH, Van Asselt AA, Dorrius MD, et al. Mammographic breast density and the risk of breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast 2022; 66:62–8.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B10">
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple">10. American College of Radiology (ACR). Breast Imaging Reporting &amp; Data System (BI-RADS®). (Accessed on 16 January 2024).</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B11">
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple">11. Bond-Smith D, Stone J. Methodological challenges and updated findings from a meta-analysis of the association between mammographic density and breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2019; 28(1):22–31.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B12">
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple">12. Ali EA, Raafat M. Relationship of mammographic densities to breast cancer risk. Egyptian J Radiol Nuclear Med 2021; 52(1):129.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B13">
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple">13. Ahmed GK, Guirguis MS, Alkaphoury MG. ACR BI-RADS Breast Density and its correlation with breast cancer screening program. QJM: An International Journal of Medicine. 2021; 114(Supplement_1):hcab106–022.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B14">
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple">14. Al-Mousa DS, Alakhras M, Spuur KM, et al. Mammographic breast density profile of Jordanian women with normal and breast cancer findings. Breast Cancer (Auckl) 2020; 14:1178223420921381.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B15">
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple">15. Checka CM, Chun JE, Schnabel FR, et al The relationship of mammographic density and age: implications for breast cancer screening. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012; 198(3):W292–5.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B16">
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple">16. Foulkes WD, Reis-Filho JS, Narod SA. Tumor size and survival in breast cancer--a reappraisal. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2010; 7(6):348–53.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B17">
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple">17. Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ, et al. Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2007; 356(3):227–36.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B18">
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple">18. Ahmadinejad N, Movahedinia S, Movahedinia S, et al. Association of mammographic density with pathologic findings. Iran Red Crescent Med J 2013; 15(12):e16698.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B19">
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple">19. Kamal RM, Mostafa S, Salem D, et al. Body mass index, breast density, and the risk of breast cancer development in relation to the menopausal status; results from a population-based screening program in a native African-Arab country. Acta Radiol Open 2022; 11(6):20584601221111704.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>
