<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//TaxonX//DTD Taxonomic Treatment Publishing DTD v0 20100105//EN" "https://foliamedica.bg/nlm/tax-treatment-NS0.dtd">
<article xmlns:tp="http://www.plazi.org/taxpub" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">87</journal-id>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="index">urn:lsid:arphahub.com:pub:A116C711-4C18-5A38-8F1E-5E97753A8A64</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title xml:lang="en">Folia Medica</journal-title>
        <abbrev-journal-title xml:lang="en">FM</abbrev-journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">0204-8043</issn>
      <issn pub-type="epub">1314-2143</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Plovdiv Medical University</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3897/folmed.68.e174430</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">174430</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Research Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="scientific_subject">
          <subject>Public health</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Association between smoking burden and one-year mortality in ST-elevation and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: insights from a regional cohort</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group content-type="authors">
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Janjani</surname>
            <given-names>Parisa</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Motevaseli</surname>
            <given-names>Sayeh</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Asgari</surname>
            <given-names>Nader</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Rouzbahani</surname>
            <given-names>Mohammad</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Janjani</surname>
            <given-names>Hosna</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A3">3</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Asadmobini</surname>
            <given-names>Atiyeh</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Salehi</surname>
            <given-names>Nahid</given-names>
          </name>
          <email xlink:type="simple">ns_salehi@kums.ac.ir</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="A1">
        <label>1</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">Cardiovascular Research Center, Health Policy and Promotion Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran</addr-line>
        <institution>Health Policy and Promotion Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Kermanshah</addr-line>
        <country>Iran</country>
        <uri content-type="ror">https://ror.org/05vspf741</uri>
      </aff>
      <aff id="A2">
        <label>2</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">Student Research Committee, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran</addr-line>
        <institution>Student Research Committee, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Kermanshah</addr-line>
        <country>Iran</country>
        <uri content-type="ror">https://ror.org/05vspf741</uri>
      </aff>
      <aff id="A3">
        <label>3</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">Research Center for Environmental Determinants of Health (RCEDH), Health Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran</addr-line>
        <institution>Health Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Kermanshah</addr-line>
        <country>Iran</country>
        <uri content-type="ror">https://ror.org/05vspf741</uri>
      </aff>
      <author-notes>
        <fn fn-type="corresp">
          <p><bold>Corresponding author</bold>: Nahid Salehi, Cardiovascular Research Center, Health Policy and Promotion Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran; Email: <email xlink:type="simple">ns_salehi@kums.ac.ir</email></p>
        </fn>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="collection">
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>16</day>
        <month>04</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>68</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <elocation-id>e174430</elocation-id>
      <uri content-type="arpha" xlink:href="http://openbiodiv.net/9075941A-36A1-55F9-A16A-AF95B9EF7C1B">9075941A-36A1-55F9-A16A-AF95B9EF7C1B</uri>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>09</day>
          <month>10</month>
          <year>2025</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>17</day>
          <month>11</month>
          <year>2025</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Parisa Janjani, Sayeh Motevaseli, Nader Asgari, Mohammad Rouzbahani, Hosna Janjani, Atiyeh Asadmobini, Nahid Salehi</copyright-statement>
        <license license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple">
          <license-p>This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <abstract>
        <label>Abstract</label>
        <p><bold>Introduction</bold>: Cigarette smoking is a major modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease and acute myocardial infarction (<abbrev xlink:title="myocardial infarction">MI</abbrev>). The prognostic impact of cumulative smoking exposure (pack-years) on post-<abbrev xlink:title="myocardial infarction">MI</abbrev> outcomes remains uncertain. The controversial “smoker’s paradox” suggesting better short-term prognosis in smokers has been largely attributed to younger age and fewer comorbidities. Prior studies frequently failed to quantify smoking intensity, stratify by <abbrev xlink:title="myocardial infarction">MI</abbrev> subtype (<abbrev xlink:title="ST-elevation myocardial infarction">STEMI</abbrev> vs. <abbrev xlink:title="non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction">NSTEMI</abbrev>), or adequately adjust for confounders such as age and renal function.</p>
        <p><bold>Aim</bold>: This study examined whether cumulative smoking burden is independently associated with one-year all-cause mortality after <abbrev xlink:title="myocardial infarction">MI</abbrev>.</p>
        <p><bold>Materials and methods</bold>: In this retrospective cohort study from a tertiary center in Western Iran (December 2019–August 2020), 1,019 confirmed <abbrev xlink:title="myocardial infarction">MI</abbrev> patients were classified as never-smokers (0 pack-years), moderate smokers (≤15 pack-years), and heavy smokers (&gt;15 pack-years). Cox proportional hazards models (crude, age-adjusted, and fully adjusted for age, sex, diabetes, hypertension, <abbrev xlink:title="body mass index">BMI</abbrev>, lipids, <abbrev xlink:title="Estimated glomerular filtration rate">eGFR</abbrev>, reperfusion therapy, and systolic blood pressure) estimated hazard ratios for one-year mortality. Proportional hazards assumptions were confirmed (Schoenfeld residuals <italic>p</italic>&gt;0.05). Bias was minimized through multivariable adjustment and sensitivity analyses.</p>
        <p><bold>Results</bold>: Smokers were younger, predominantly male, and had fewer comorbidities. In <abbrev xlink:title="ST-elevation myocardial infarction">STEMI</abbrev>, heavy smokers exhibited lower crude mortality than never-smokers, but this vanished after adjustment. No differences emerged across smoking categories in <abbrev xlink:title="non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction">NSTEMI</abbrev>. Age and reduced <abbrev xlink:title="Estimated glomerular filtration rate">eGFR</abbrev> consistently predicted mortality in both subtypes.</p>
        <p><bold>Conclusions</bold>: Cumulative smoking burden showed no independent association with one-year post-<abbrev xlink:title="myocardial infarction">MI</abbrev> mortality. The smoker’s paradox is explained by confounding, especially age and renal function. Smoking cessation remains essential for secondary prevention.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <label>Keywords</label>
        <kwd>Cox regression</kwd>
        <kwd>mortality</kwd>
        <kwd>myocardial infarction</kwd>
        <kwd>NSTEMI</kwd>
        <kwd>renal function</kwd>
        <kwd>smoker’s paradox</kwd>
        <kwd>smoking burden</kwd>
        <kwd>STEMI</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
    <notes>
      <sec sec-type="Citation" id="sec1">
        <title>Citation</title>
        <p>Janjani P, Motevaseli S, Asgari N, Rouzbahani M, Janjani H, Asadmobini A, Salehi N. Association between smoking burden and one-year mortality in ST-elevation and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: insights from a regional cohort. Folia Med (Plovdiv) 2026;68(2):е174430. <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.3897/folmed.68.e174430">doi: 10.3897/folmed.68.e174430</ext-link>.</p>
      </sec>
    </notes>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec sec-type="Introduction" id="sec2">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Tobacco use remains one of the leading global causes of preventable morbidity and mortality, with cardiovascular disease representing its most devastating consequence. According to the World Health Organization, over seven million deaths annually are attributed to tobacco use, a substantial proportion from ischemic heart disease.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>]</sup> Both active smoking and exposure to secondhand smoke pose significant threats to cardiovascular health, emphasizing the pervasive nature of this public health challenge.</p>
      <p>Cigarette smoking accelerates atherogenesis, impairs endothelial function, and promotes a prothrombotic state all of which increase the risk of acute myocardial infarction (<abbrev xlink:title="acute myocardial infarction">AMI</abbrev>).<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>]</sup> While smoking is a well-established risk factor for coronary artery disease, paradoxical findings in acute settings often termed the “smoker’s paradox” have suggested lower short-term mortality among smokers following <abbrev xlink:title="acute myocardial infarction">AMI</abbrev>.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>]</sup> Several observational studies have reported lower in-hospital or early mortality among smokers compared to non-smokers presenting with <abbrev xlink:title="acute myocardial infarction">AMI</abbrev>. This paradox is often attributed to confounding factors such as younger age, fewer comorbidities, or differences in therapeutic responsiveness among smokers.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>]</sup></p>
      <p>However, more recent evidence suggests that the perceived survival advantage dissipates after appropriate statistical adjustments for baseline disparities.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>]</sup></p>
      <p>Significant gaps remain in understanding the prognostic impact of smoking post-<abbrev xlink:title="myocardial infarction">MI</abbrev>. Most studies dichotomize patients as smokers or non-smokers, overlooking cumulative exposure via pack-years, which may obscure dose-response relationships.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>]</sup> Additionally, few have stratified analyses by <abbrev xlink:title="acute myocardial infarction">AMI</abbrev> subtype ST-elevation myocardial infarction (<abbrev xlink:title="ST-elevation myocardial infarction">STEMI</abbrev>) and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (<abbrev xlink:title="non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction">NSTEMI</abbrev>) despite their distinct pathophysiology, management, and prognosis. The lack of subtype-specific analyses limits insights into whether smoking’s impact varies across these conditions. Furthermore, prior studies often inadequately adjust for critical confounders like renal function, which strongly predicts post-<abbrev xlink:title="myocardial infarction">MI</abbrev> outcomes.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>]</sup></p>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Aim" id="sec3">
      <title>Aim</title>
      <p>This study addresses these gaps by evaluating the association between cumulative smoking burden (pack-years) and one-year all-cause mortality in a regional cohort of <abbrev xlink:title="ST-elevation myocardial infarction">STEMI</abbrev> and <abbrev xlink:title="non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction">NSTEMI</abbrev> patients from the Middle East, using robust statistical adjustments, subtype-specific analyses, and dose-response quantification a novel approach in non-Western populations where tobacco use patterns may differ. This provides a nuanced understanding of smoking’s prognostic role in contemporary <abbrev xlink:title="myocardial infarction">MI</abbrev> management, contributing to global diversity in cardiovascular epidemiology.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="sec4">
      <title>Materials and methods</title>
      <sec sec-type="Study design and population" id="sec5">
        <title>Study design and population</title>
        <p>This retrospective cohort study was conducted at Imam Ali Hospital, a tertiary cardiovascular referral center located in Western Iran. We included all patients aged ≥18 years admitted with a confirmed diagnosis of either <abbrev xlink:title="ST-elevation myocardial infarction">STEMI</abbrev> or <abbrev xlink:title="non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction">NSTEMI</abbrev> between December 2019 and August 2020. <abbrev xlink:title="ST-elevation myocardial infarction">STEMI</abbrev> and <abbrev xlink:title="non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction">NSTEMI</abbrev> diagnoses were established based on standard clinical, electrocardiographic, and biochemical criteria. Patients with a history of prior myocardial infarction (<abbrev xlink:title="myocardial infarction">MI</abbrev>) were excluded to minimize confounding from recurrent ischemic events and differences in baseline risk profiles, such as variations in treatment history or disease severity. Patients with incomplete clinical data or unavailable follow-up information at one year were also excluded from the analysis.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Data collection and baseline variables" id="sec6">
        <title>Data collection and baseline variables</title>
        <p>Demographic characteristics, medical history, and cardiovascular risk factors were collected at the time of hospital admission via structured interviews by trained nurses and validated against the hospital’s electronic medical records. Clinical data included prior myocardial infarction, revascularization history, presence of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and hyperlipidemia. Vital signs, laboratory tests (lipid profile, serum creatinine), and body mass index (<abbrev xlink:title="body mass index">BMI</abbrev>) were recorded upon admission. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (<abbrev xlink:title="Estimated glomerular filtration rate">eGFR</abbrev>) was estimated using the CKD-EPI formula. Blood pressure was categorized into three groups: ˂112 mmHg, 112–140 mmHg, and &gt;140 mmHg based on prior literature.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>]</sup></p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Smoking burden" id="sec7">
        <title>Smoking burden</title>
        <p>Smoking burden was assessed using the pack-year index, calculated by multiplying the number of cigarette packs smoked per day by the number of years the patient had smoked. Patients were categorized as never-smokers (0 pack-years), moderate smokers (≤15 pack-years), or heavy smokers (&gt;15 pack-years) based on prior literature.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>]</sup> Smoking status was self-reported at admission due to the absence of biochemical verification.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Study outcome and follow-up" id="sec8">
        <title>Study outcome and follow-up</title>
        <p>The primary outcome was all-cause mortality within one year of <abbrev xlink:title="acute myocardial infarction">AMI</abbrev> diagnosis, including in-hospital and post-discharge deaths. In-hospital mortality was documented via hospital records. Contact information for patients or their family members was recorded at admission to facilitate follow-up. Patients were contacted by phone at one year. For reported deaths, clinical and hospital records, including cause of death, were reviewed. Loss to follow-up was minimal (1.2%, 12/1,019), primarily due to outdated contact information. The follow-up period was defined as the time from <abbrev xlink:title="acute myocardial infarction">AMI</abbrev> diagnosis to death, loss to follow-up, or 365 days, whichever occurred first.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Addressing bias" id="sec9">
        <title>Addressing bias</title>
        <p>To minimize bias, several measures were implemented. Selection bias was reduced by including all eligible patients during the study period and excluding those with prior <abbrev xlink:title="myocardial infarction">MI</abbrev> to limit confounding from recurrent events. Information bias was addressed by validating self-reported data (e.g., smoking status, medical history) against electronic medical records where possible. For smoking status, structured interviews used standardized questions to reduce recall bias, though biochemical validation was not feasible. Missing data (&lt;5% per variable) were handled via list wise deletion, with sensitivity analyses excluding cases with missing <abbrev xlink:title="Estimated glomerular filtration rate">eGFR</abbrev> values to assess robustness. Multivariable adjustment in Cox models accounted for key confounders (age, sex, diabetes, hypertension, <abbrev xlink:title="body mass index">BMI</abbrev>, lipid profiles, <abbrev xlink:title="Estimated glomerular filtration rate">eGFR</abbrev>, reperfusion therapy, SBP). No imputation was performed due to low missingness, but patterns of missing data were assessed to ensure they were not systematically related to outcomes.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Ethical approval and consent for study" id="sec10">
        <title>Ethical approval and consent for study</title>
        <p>All patients signed a written informed consent before enrolling in the study. The Research Ethics Committee at the Deputy of Research of the Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences approved the study protocol (Ethics registration code: IR.KUMS.REC.1400.252).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Statistical analysis" id="sec11">
        <title>Statistical analysis</title>
        <p>Continuous variables were presented as mean ± standard deviation (<abbrev xlink:title="standard deviation">SD</abbrev>) and categorical variables as absolute value and percentage. Baseline characteristics were compared using chi-square and ANOVA as appropriate. Cox proportional hazards regression models were constructed separately for <abbrev xlink:title="ST-elevation myocardial infarction">STEMI</abbrev> and <abbrev xlink:title="non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction">NSTEMI</abbrev> to estimate hazard ratios (<abbrev xlink:title="hazard ratios">HRs</abbrev>) and 95% confidence intervals (<abbrev xlink:title="confidence intervals">CIs</abbrev>) for all-cause mortality. Three models were assessed: crude, age-adjusted, and fully adjusted models including all covariates. To address potential sources of bias, we used multivariable adjustment for confounders and excluded patients with prior <abbrev xlink:title="myocardial infarction">MI</abbrev>. Missing data were minimal (&lt;5% per variable) and handled via listwise deletion in analyses. No formal interaction tests were performed, but subtype-specific models served as subgroup analyses. Sensitivity analyses were conducted by excluding cases with missing GFR values, yielding similar results.</p>
        <p>This study followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>]</sup></p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Results" id="sec12">
      <title>Results</title>
      <sec sec-type="Baseline characteristics of STEMI and NSTEMI patients" id="sec13">
        <title>Baseline characteristics of STEMI and NSTEMI patients</title>
        <p>Of 1,200 potentially eligible patients, 1,019 were included after excluding 100 with prior <abbrev xlink:title="myocardial infarction">MI</abbrev> and 81 with incomplete data (missing follow-up or lab results) <bold>(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1</xref>)</bold>. Loss to follow-up was 12 (1.2%). Among the 1,019 patients, 645 (63.3%) had <abbrev xlink:title="ST-elevation myocardial infarction">STEMI</abbrev> and 374 (36.7%) had <abbrev xlink:title="non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction">NSTEMI</abbrev>. Missing data were minimal (&lt;2% for age/sex, 4% for <abbrev xlink:title="Estimated glomerular filtration rate">eGFR</abbrev>).</p>
        <fig id="F1">
          <object-id content-type="arpha">0311C73E-8E1B-5902-BAF1-8B59DA5673DC</object-id>
          <label>Figure 1.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Flow diagram of participant selection. The diagram illustrates the selection process of patients included in the analysis, with reasons for exclusions and loss to follow-up.</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="foliamedica-68-2-e174430-g001.jpg" id="oo_1595231.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1595231</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
        <p>Among 645 <abbrev xlink:title="ST-elevation myocardial infarction">STEMI</abbrev> patients (356 never-smokers, 124 moderate smokers, 165 heavy smokers), smokers were younger (mean age: 55.53±11.81 years for ≤15 pack-years, 57.63±9.89 years for &gt;15 pack-years vs. 62.38±13.33 years for never-smokers; <italic>p</italic>&lt;0.001) and predominantly male (&gt;95% vs. 63.2%; <italic>p</italic>&lt;0.001). Smokers had lower <abbrev xlink:title="body mass index">BMI</abbrev> (25.50±4.28 kg/m<sup>2</sup> for &gt;15 pack-years vs. 26.81±4.68 kg/m<sup>2</sup>; <italic>p</italic>=0.034), lower SBP and DBP (<italic>p</italic>=0.002), and lower prevalence of hypertension (22.4% vs. 47.9%; <italic>p</italic>&lt;0.001) and diabetes (10.9% vs. 29.5%; <italic>p</italic>&lt;0.001). <abbrev xlink:title="Estimated glomerular filtration rate">eGFR</abbrev> was higher among smokers (<italic>p</italic>&lt;0.001). Educational attainment was lower among smokers (<italic>p</italic>&lt;0.001). One-year mortality was lower among smokers (7.3% for ≤15 pack-years, 6.1% for &gt;15 pack-years vs. 13.2%; <italic>p</italic>=0.021). No differences were observed in income level or reperfusion therapy <bold>(Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>)</bold>.</p>
        <table-wrap id="T1" position="float" orientation="portrait">
          <label>Table 1.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Demographic and clinical characteristics of <abbrev xlink:title="ST-elevation myocardial infarction">STEMI</abbrev> patients by pack-years of cigarette smoking status.</p>
          </caption>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Characteristics</bold>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>All (n=645)</bold>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Never-smoker (n=356)</bold>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>≤15 Pack-Years (n=124)</bold>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>&gt;15 pack-years (n=165)</bold>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold><italic>P</italic>-value</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Age (years)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">59.58±12.57</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">62.38±13.33</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">55.53±11.81</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">57.63±9.89</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">&lt;0.001</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Sex, n (%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Male</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">503 (77.98%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">225 (63.20%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">119 (95.97%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">159 (96.63%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">&lt;0.001</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Female</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">142 (22.02%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">131 (36.80%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">5 (4.03%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">6 (3.64%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"><abbrev xlink:title="body mass index">BMI</abbrev> (kg/m<sup>2</sup>),</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">26.35±4.53</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">26.81±4.68</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">26.31±4.34</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">25.50±4.28</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.034</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Systolic pressure (mmHg)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">135.37±26.84</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">138.54±28.57</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">130.71±24.21</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">132.15±24.06</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.002</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Diastolic pressure (mmHg)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">83.30±14.82</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">85±16.02</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">80.40±12.90</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">81.90±13.00</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.002</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">SBP˂112</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">137 (21.88%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">69 (20.13%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">31 (25.62%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">37 (22.84%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.015</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">112˂SBP˂140</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">212 (33.87%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">101 (29.45%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">46 (38.02%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">65 (40.12%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">SBP&gt;140</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">277 (44.25%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">173 (50.44%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">44 (36.36%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">60 (37.04%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Hypertension, n (%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">&lt;0.001</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Yes</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">246 (38.20%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">170 (47.89%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">39 (31.45%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">37 (22.42%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">No</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">398 (61.80%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">185 (52.11%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">85 (68.55%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">128 (77.58%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Diabetes, n (%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">&lt;0.001</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Yes</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">143 (22.17%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">105 (29.49%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">20 (16.13%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">18 (10.91%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">No</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">502 (77.83%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">251 (70.51%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">104 (83.87%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">147 (89.09%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Total cholesterol, mmol/l</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">167.50±41.55</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">168.41±42.75</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">171±44.66</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">162.90±36.01</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.228</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">HDL-C, mg/dL</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">38.48±14.65</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">38.56±12.53</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">40.78±20.84</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">36.55±12.87</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.105</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"><abbrev xlink:title="Estimated glomerular filtration rate">eGFR</abbrev>, ml/min</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">72.23±21.95</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">67.58±22.67</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">76.90±21.92</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">78.83±17.66</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">&lt;0.001</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Education</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">&lt;0.001</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Illiterate</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">206 (32.04%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">147 (41.29%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">26 (21.31%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">33 (20%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Primary school</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">146 (22.71%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">71 (19.94%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">23 (18.85%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">52 (31.52%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Secondary school</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">121 (18.82%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">51 (14.33%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">35 (28.69%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">32 (21.21%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Diploma</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">106 (16.49%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">51 (14.33%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">24 (19.67%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">31 (18.79%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Post-diploma and higher</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">64 (9.95%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">36 (10.11%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">14 (11.48%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">14 (8.48%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Income</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.265</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Very low</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">327 (51.01%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">182 (51.27%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">61 (50.41%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">84 (50.91%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Low</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">137 (21.37%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">74 (20.85%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">30 (24.79%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">33 (20%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Moderate</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">117 (18.25%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">64 (18.03%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">17 (14.05%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">36 (21.82%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Good</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">55 (8.58%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">34 (9.58%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">10 (8.26%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">11 (6.67%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Very good</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">5 (0.78%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1 (0.28%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">3 (2.48%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1 (0.61%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Reperfusion</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.102</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Yes</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">531 (82.33%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">283 (79.49%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">105 (84.68%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">143 (86.67%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">No</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">114 (17.67%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">73 (20.51%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">19 (15.32%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">22 (13.33%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">One year mortality</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.021</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Yes</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">66 (10.23%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">47 (13.20%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">9 (7.26%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">10 (6.06%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">No</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">579 (89.77%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">309 (86.80%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">115 (92.74%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">155 (93.94%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
          <table-wrap-foot>
            <fn>
              <p><abbrev xlink:title="body mass index">BMI</abbrev>: body mass index; HDL-C: high density lipoprotein-cholesterol; <abbrev xlink:title="Estimated glomerular filtration rate">eGFR</abbrev>: estimated glomerular filtration rate</p>
            </fn>
          </table-wrap-foot>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>Among 374 <abbrev xlink:title="non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction">NSTEMI</abbrev> patients (253 never-smokers, 58 moderate smokers, 63 heavy smokers), age did not differ significantly (<italic>p</italic>=0.339). Male sex was more prevalent among smokers (87.9% for ≤15 pack-years, 100% for &gt;15 pack-years vs. 56.1%; <italic>p</italic>&lt;0.001). Hypertension (31.8% vs. 54.2%; <italic>p</italic>=0.003) and diabetes (7.9% vs. 26.9%; <italic>p</italic>=0.002) were less prevalent among smokers. <abbrev xlink:title="Estimated glomerular filtration rate">eGFR</abbrev> was higher among smokers (<italic>p</italic>=0.029). Educational attainment was lower among smokers (<italic>p</italic>&lt;0.001), but income level and reperfusion therapy did not differ. One-year mortality was similar across groups (<italic>p</italic>=0.761) <bold>(Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref>)</bold>.</p>
        <table-wrap id="T2" position="float" orientation="portrait">
          <label>Table 2.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Demographic and clinical characteristics of <abbrev xlink:title="non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction">NSTEMI</abbrev> patients by pack-years of cigarette smoking status</p>
          </caption>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Characteristics</bold>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>All (n=374)</bold>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Never-smoker (n=253)</bold>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>≤15 pack-years (n=58)</bold>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>&gt;15 pack-years  (n=63)</bold>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold><italic>P</italic>-value</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Age (years)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">59.73±12.75</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">60.12±13.35</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">57.46±12.57</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">60.24±10.12</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.339</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Sex, n (%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Male</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">231 (61.76%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">117 (46.25%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">51 (87.93%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">63 (100%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">&lt;0.001</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Female</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">143 (38.24%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">136 (53.57%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">7 (12.07%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"><abbrev xlink:title="body mass index">BMI</abbrev> (kg/m<sup>2</sup>),</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">26.48±4.40</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">26.79±4.48</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">26.07±4.12</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">25.72±4.32</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.253</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Systolic pressure (mmHg)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">141.93±27.34</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">144.23±27.31</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">136.98±27.83</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">137.02±26.15</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.064</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Diastolic pressure (mmHg)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">85.25±15.35</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">86.07±14.48</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">83.02±19.02</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">83.97±15.00</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.318</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">SBP˂112</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">56 (15.51%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">33 (13.41%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">12 (21.43%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">11 (18.64%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.331</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">112˂SBP˂140</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">109 (30.19%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">71 (28.86%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">19 (33.93%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">19 (32.20%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">SBP&gt;140</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">196 (54.29%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">142 (57.72%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">25 (46.64%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">29 (49.15%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Hypertension, n (%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Yes</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">181 (48.40%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">137 (54.15%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">24 (41.38%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">20 (31.75%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.003</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">No</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">193 (51.60%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">116 (45.85%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">34 (58.62%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">43 (68.25%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Diabetes, n (%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Yes</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">82 (21.93%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">68 (26.88%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">9 (15.52%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">5 (7.94%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.002</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">No</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">292 (78.07%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">185 (73.12%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">49 (84.48%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">58 (92.06%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Total cholesterol, mmol/l</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">159.24±45.77</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">160.45±46.59</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">152.57±40.91</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">160.19±46.66</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.517</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">HDL-C, mg/dL</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">38.92±17.77</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">38.63±15.63</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">38.89±12.94</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">40.16±27.46</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.833</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"><abbrev xlink:title="Estimated glomerular filtration rate">eGFR</abbrev> (mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">68.95±20.71</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">66.99±20.72</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">73.56±22.06</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">72.56±18.41</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.029</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Education</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Illiterate</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">144 (38.61%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">116 (46.03%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">11 (18.97%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">17 (26.98%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">&lt;0.001</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Primary school</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">90 (24.13%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">51 (20.24%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">19 (32.76%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">20 (31.75%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Secondary school</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">67 (17.96%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">34 (13.49%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">18 (31.03%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">15 (23.8%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Diploma</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">44 (11.80%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">28 (11.11%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">5 (8.62%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">11 (17.46%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Post-diploma and higher</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">28 (7.51%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">23 (9.13%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">5 (8.62%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Income level</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Very low</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">216 (57.91%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">147 (58.33%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">30 (51.72%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">39 (61.90%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.450</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Low</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">64 (17.16%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">39 (15.48%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">13 (22.41%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">12 (19.05%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Moderate</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">57 (15.28%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">40 (15.87%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">9 (15.52%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">8 (12.70%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Good</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">29 (7.77%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">31 (9.13%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">3 (5.17%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">3 (4.76%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Very good</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">7 (1.88)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">3 (1.19%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">3 (5.17%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1 (1.59%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Reperfusion therapy</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Yes</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">95 (25.40%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">63 (24.90%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">18 (31.03%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">14 (22.33%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.512</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">No</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">279 (74.60%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">190 (75.10%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">40 (68.97%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">49 (77.78%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">One-year mortality</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Yes</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">23 (6.15%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">17 (6.72%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">2 (3.45%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">4(6.35%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.761</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">No</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">351 (93.85%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">236 (93.28%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">56 (96.55%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">59 (93.65%)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
          <table-wrap-foot>
            <fn>
              <p><abbrev xlink:title="body mass index">BMI</abbrev>: body mass index; HDL-C: high density lipoprotein-cholesterol; <abbrev xlink:title="Estimated glomerular filtration rate">eGFR</abbrev>: estimated glomerular filtration rate</p>
            </fn>
          </table-wrap-foot>
        </table-wrap>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Association between smoking and one-year mortality in STEMI and NSTEMI patients" id="sec14">
        <title>Association between smoking and one-year mortality in STEMI and NSTEMI patients</title>
        <p>In the unadjusted model, patients with a smoking history &gt;15 pack-years had a significantly lower risk of one-year mortality compared to never-smokers (HR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.23–0.91). Those with &lt;15 pack-years also showed a lower, though non-significant, risk (HR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.26–1.19). After adjusting for age, the protective association was attenuated and no longer statistically significant (HR for &gt;15 pack-years: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.29–1.16). In the full-adjusted model, which controlled for age, sex, diabetes, hypertension, <abbrev xlink:title="body mass index">BMI</abbrev>, lipid profiles, estimated <abbrev xlink:title="Estimated glomerular filtration rate">eGFR</abbrev>, reperfusion therapy, and SBP, the association remained non-significant (HR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.24–2.31 for &gt;15 pack-years). Among the covariates, age was consistently associated with increased mortality risk across models (full-adjusted HR: 1.07; 95% CI: 1.02–1.12). Diabetes was a significant predictor in the crude and age-adjusted models but not in the full-adjusted model. <abbrev xlink:title="Estimated glomerular filtration rate">eGFR</abbrev> was inversely associated with mortality in unadjusted (HR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.96–0.98) and age-adjusted models (HR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.96–0.99), though the association lost significance after full adjustment. SBP &gt;140 mmHg was associated with reduced mortality in unadjusted (HR: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.23–0.78) and age-adjusted models (HR: 0.42; 95% CI: 0.23–0.77), but this effect was not observed in the full-adjusted model (HR: 1.31; 95% CI: 0.36–4.78). Reperfusion therapy was significantly associated with reduced mortality in the crude model (HR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.29–0.85), but this association was not sustained after full adjustment <bold>(Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref>)</bold>.</p>
        <table-wrap id="T3" position="float" orientation="portrait">
          <label>Table 3.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Unadjusted and adjusted association between smoking and clinical outcomes in <abbrev xlink:title="ST-elevation myocardial infarction">STEMI</abbrev> patients </p>
          </caption>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Variables</bold>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Crude model, <abbrev xlink:title="hazard ratios">HRs</abbrev> (95% <abbrev xlink:title="confidence intervals">CIs</abbrev>)</bold>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Age-adjusted <abbrev xlink:title="hazard ratios">HRs</abbrev> (95% <abbrev xlink:title="confidence intervals">CIs</abbrev>)</bold>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Full-adjusted <abbrev xlink:title="hazard ratios">HRs</abbrev> (95% <abbrev xlink:title="confidence intervals">CIs</abbrev>)</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Never-smoker</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Reference</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Reference</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Reference</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">˂15</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.54 (0.26-1.19)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.64 (0.30-1.38)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.23 (0.02-1.87)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">&gt;15</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.46 (0.23-0.91)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.58 (0.29-1.16)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.75 (0.24-2.31)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Age (years)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.04 (1.02-1.06)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.07 (1.02-1.12)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Sex (female vs. male)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.92 (1.16-3.19)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.51 (0.89-2.54)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.22 (0.42-3.51)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Diabetes</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">2.63 (1.61-4.30)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">2.47 (1.50-4.06)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.10 (0.38-3.21)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Hypertension</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.46 (0.90-2.36)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.12 (0.68-1.84)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.71 (0.27-1.82)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">HDL-C (mg/dL)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1 (0.98-1.01)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1 (0.98-1.02)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1 (0.97-1.03)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Cholesterol (mg/dL)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1 (0.99-1.02)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1 (0.99-1)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1 (0.99-1.01)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"><abbrev xlink:title="body mass index">BMI</abbrev> (kg/m<sup>2</sup>)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.00 (0.93-1.10)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.03 (0.95-1.13)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.02 (0.93-1.12)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"><abbrev xlink:title="Estimated glomerular filtration rate">eGFR</abbrev> (mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.97 (0.96-0.98)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.98 (0.96-0.99)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.02 (0.99-1.05)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Reperfusion therapy</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.50 (0.29-0.85)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.64 (0.37-1.12)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.67 (0.46-6.05)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">SBP˂112</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Reference</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Reference</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Reference</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">112-140</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.57 (0.31-1.04)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.55 (0.30-1.00)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.99 (0.25-3.96)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">SBP&gt;140</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.43 (0.23-0.78)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.42 (0.23-0.77)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.31 (0.36-4.78)</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
          <table-wrap-foot>
            <fn>
              <p><abbrev xlink:title="body mass index">BMI</abbrev>: body mass index; HDL-C: high-density lipoproteins-cholesterol; SBP: systolic blood pressure; <abbrev xlink:title="Estimated glomerular filtration rate">eGFR</abbrev>: glomerular filtration rate </p>
            </fn>
          </table-wrap-foot>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>Among <abbrev xlink:title="non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction">NSTEMI</abbrev> patients, no significant association was observed between smoking and one-year mortality across all models. In the crude model, the HR for &lt;15 pack-years was 0.49 (95% CI: 0.11–2.15) and 1.00 (95% CI: 0.33–2.97) for &gt;15 pack-years. These estimates remained non-significant after age adjustment (HR: 0.56 and 1.12, respectively) and in the full-adjusted model (HR: 0.14; 95% CI: 0.00–3.90 for &lt;15 pack-years and HR: 1.10; 95% CI: 0.27–4.46 for &gt;15 pack-years). Age was a significant predictor of mortality in the unadjusted model (HR: 1.06; 95% CI: 1.03–1.10), though this association weakened in the full-adjusted model (HR: 1.05; 95% CI: 0.98–1.14). <abbrev xlink:title="Estimated glomerular filtration rate">eGFR</abbrev> remained a robust inverse predictor of mortality in all models, including the full-adjusted model (HR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.90–0.99). Reperfusion therapy was associated with significantly reduced mortality in both the crude (HR: 0.12; 95% CI: 0.01–0.92) and age-adjusted (HR: 0.13; 95% CI: 0.017–0.96) models, though this effect was attenuated in the full-adjusted model (HR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.08–8.41). Lower systolic blood pressure (&lt;112 mmHg) was associated with increased mortality compared to higher SBP categories in unadjusted and age-adjusted models; however, these associations lost significance after full adjustment <bold>(Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">4</xref>)</bold>.</p>
        <table-wrap id="T4" position="float" orientation="portrait">
          <label>Table 4.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Unadjusted and adjusted association between smoking and clinical outcomes in <abbrev xlink:title="non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction">NSTEMI</abbrev> patients </p>
          </caption>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Variables</bold>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Crude model, <abbrev xlink:title="hazard ratios">HRs</abbrev> (95%<abbrev xlink:title="confidence intervals">CIs</abbrev>)</bold>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Age-adjusted, <abbrev xlink:title="hazard ratios">HRs</abbrev> (95%<abbrev xlink:title="confidence intervals">CIs</abbrev>)</bold>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Full-adjusted, <abbrev xlink:title="hazard ratios">HRs</abbrev> (95%<abbrev xlink:title="confidence intervals">CIs</abbrev>)</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Never-smoker</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Reference</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Reference</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Reference</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">˂15</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.49 (0.11-2.15)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.56 (0.13-2.46)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.14 (0-3.90)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">&gt;15</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1 (0.33-2.97)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.12 (0.37-3.36)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.10 (0.27-4.46)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Age (years)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.06 (1.03-1.10)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.05 (0.98-1.14)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Sex</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.05 (0.45-2.42)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.03 (0.44-2.38)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.59 (0.06-5.28)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Diabetes</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">2 (0.85-4.72)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.71 (0.72-4.03)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">3.87 (0.58-25.92)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Hypertension</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">2.61 (1.07-6.35)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.84 (0.74-4.55)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">3.35 (0.37-29.93)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">HDL-C (mg/dL)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1 (0.99-1.02)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1 (0.98-1)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.99 (0.96-1)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Cholesterol (mg/dL)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.99 (0.98-1)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.99 (0.98-1)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.99 (0.96-1)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"><abbrev xlink:title="body mass index">BMI</abbrev> (kg/m<sup>2</sup>)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.95 (0.81-1.12)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.97 (0.81-1.16)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.96 (0.76-1.20)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <abbrev xlink:title="Estimated glomerular filtration rate">eGFR</abbrev>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.95 (0.93-0.97)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.98 (0.96-0.99)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.95 (0.90-0.99)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Reperfusion therapy</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.12 (0.01-0.92)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.13 (0.017-0.96)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.86 (0.08-8.41)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">SBP˂112 112-140 SBP&gt;140</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Reference  0.30 (0.98-0.92) 0.33 (0.13-0.84)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Reference  0.33 (0.11-1.01) 0.31 (0.12-0.78)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Reference  0.36 (0.02-5.82) 0.20 (0.02-1.77)</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
          <table-wrap-foot>
            <fn>
              <p><abbrev xlink:title="body mass index">BMI</abbrev>: body mass index; HDL-C: high-density lipoproteins-cholesterol; SBP: systolic blood pressure; <abbrev xlink:title="Estimated glomerular filtration rate">eGFR</abbrev>: glomerular filtration rate</p>
            </fn>
          </table-wrap-foot>
        </table-wrap>
        <p><bold>Figs <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref></bold> and <bold><xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref></bold> show the survival curves for heavy and moderate smokers versus never-smokers based on the full-adjusted Cox regression model.</p>
        <fig id="F2">
          <object-id content-type="arpha">7E046651-8051-54A4-8B34-92DE30654F85</object-id>
          <label>Figure 2.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>The full-adjusted Cox regression survival curves for heavy and moderate smokers and never-smokers in <abbrev xlink:title="ST-elevation myocardial infarction">STEMI</abbrev> patients.</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="foliamedica-68-2-e174430-g002.jpg" id="oo_1595232.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1595232</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
        <fig id="F3">
          <object-id content-type="arpha">08FB3C8A-5FB0-5466-8D68-0E4E9EF5F843</object-id>
          <label>Figure 3</label>
          <caption>
            <p>. The full-adjusted Cox regression survival curves for heavy and moderate smokers and never-smokers in <abbrev xlink:title="non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction">NSTEMI</abbrev> patients.</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="foliamedica-68-2-e174430-g003.jpg" id="oo_1595233.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1595233</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Discussion" id="sec15">
      <title>Discussion</title>
      <p>In this retrospective cohort study of patients presenting with <abbrev xlink:title="ST-elevation myocardial infarction">STEMI</abbrev> and <abbrev xlink:title="non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction">NSTEMI</abbrev>, we found that smoking burden, as measured in pack-years, was not independently associated with one-year all-cause mortality following adjustment for key clinical variables. Although heavy smoking initially appeared to be linked to reduced mortality among <abbrev xlink:title="ST-elevation myocardial infarction">STEMI</abbrev> patients in unadjusted analyses, this association was nullified after adjusting for confounders. These results cast doubt on the concept of the “smoker’s paradox” and reaffirm the well-documented deleterious cardiovascular effects of tobacco use.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>]</sup></p>
      <p>Our results are consistent with prior studies demonstrating that the apparent protective effects of smoking in <abbrev xlink:title="acute myocardial infarction">AMI</abbrev> patients are largely attributable to confounding by younger age, lower burden of comorbidities, and potential differences in clinical management.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>]</sup> Gao et al. similarly reported that, in an unadjusted model, smoking history appeared protective, but after adjusting for age and the number of cigarettes smoked, smoking was associated with worse outcomes.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>]</sup> Moreover, a meta-analysis of PCI trials also found that smoking was linked to higher risks of all-cause mortality and heart failure when appropriate adjustments were applied.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>]</sup></p>
      <p>Interestingly, despite a higher incidence of recurrent myocardial infarction among smokers reported in some studies<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>]</sup>, we did not observe a significant association between smoking burden and increased one-year mortality. Several factors could account for this finding. First, improvements in acute cardiac care and early revascularization strategies may mitigate the adverse effects of recurrent ischemic events. Second, the urban structure and efficient healthcare system in the studied region may allow faster access to medical care, potentially improving survival despite adverse risk profiles. Third, our sample size, although relatively large, may still have limited power to detect small differences in mortality across smoking categories.</p>
      <p>Renal dysfunction (GFR &lt;60 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>) and older age emerged as the strongest independent predictors of one-year mortality, consistent with prior literature.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">19</xref>]</sup> These findings highlight the importance of comprehensive risk stratification in <abbrev xlink:title="acute myocardial infarction">AMI</abbrev> patients beyond traditional risk factors like smoking status alone.</p>
      <p>Notably, smoking burden did not appear to differentially impact outcomes between <abbrev xlink:title="ST-elevation myocardial infarction">STEMI</abbrev> and <abbrev xlink:title="non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction">NSTEMI</abbrev> patients, suggesting that cumulative tobacco exposure may exert similar biological effects across <abbrev xlink:title="acute myocardial infarction">AMI</abbrev> subtypes once acute management is optimized.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Limitations" id="sec16">
      <title>Limitations</title>
      <p>This study has several limitations. First, the retrospective design may introduce selection and information bias. Second, smoking status was self-reported without biochemical validation, raising the possibility of misclassification. Third, the study population was derived from a single tertiary care center, potentially limiting the generalizability of our findings to broader populations. Furthermore, the pack-year cutoff of 15, while based on prior literature<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>]</sup>, was arbitrary and may not capture the nuanced effects of smoking intensity. Finally, residual confounding cannot be fully excluded despite comprehensive adjustments.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Conclusions" id="sec17">
      <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>In this large, real-world cohort of patients with <abbrev xlink:title="ST-elevation myocardial infarction">STEMI</abbrev> and <abbrev xlink:title="non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction">NSTEMI</abbrev>, cumulative smoking burden was not an independent predictor of one-year all-cause mortality after adjustment for key confounders. These results challenge the validity of the smoker’s paradox and underscore the importance of incorporating renal function and age into risk assessment models. Efforts to promote smoking cessation should remain a cornerstone of secondary prevention strategies in <abbrev xlink:title="acute myocardial infarction">AMI</abbrev> care, regardless of initial mortality trends. Future studies should employ prospective designs with biochemical validation, multi-center cohorts, and biomarkers (e.g., cotinine or genetic modifiers) to confirm dose-response in diverse populations.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Ethical approval" id="sec18">
      <title>Ethical approval</title>
      <p>This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences (protocol No. IR.KUMS.REC.1400.252). The declarations can be accessed through the institutional Ethics Review Board archives at Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran where they are deposited.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Ethical statement" id="sec19">
      <title>Ethical statement</title>
      <list list-type="bullet">
        <list-item>
          <p>The authors declared that no clinical trials were used in the present study.
</p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>The authors declared that no experiments on humans or human tissues were performed for the present study.
</p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>The authors declared that informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
</p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>The authors declared that no experiments on animals were performed for the present study.
</p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>The authors declared that no commercially available immortalized human and animal cell lines were used in the present study.
</p>
        </list-item>
      </list>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Competing interests" id="sec20">
      <title>Competing interests</title>
      <p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Use of AI" id="sec21">
      <title>Use of AI</title>
      <p>No use of AI was reported.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Funding" id="sec22">
      <title>Funding</title>
      <p>The authors have no funding to report.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Author contributions" id="sec23">
      <title>Author contributions</title>
      <p>PJ: conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, writing–original draft; SM: data curation, investigation, writing–original draft; NA: supervision, validation, writing–review and editing; MR: data curation, formal analysis, visualization; HJ: investigation, resources, writing–review and editing; AA: methodology, project administration, writing–review and editing; NS: supervision, funding acquisition, writing–review and editing.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Data availability" id="sec24">
      <title>Data availability</title>
      <p>All data used are referenced or included in the article.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ack>
      <title>Acknowledgements</title>
      <p>The authors have no support to report.</p>
    </ack>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="B1">
        <label>1.</label>
        <mixed-citation>World Health Organization. Tobacco [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2024 May 3]. Available from: <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/tobacco" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/tobacco</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B2">
        <label>2.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Ambrose JA, Barua RS. The pathophysiology of cigarette smoking and cardiovascular disease: an update. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 43(10):1731–7.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B3">
        <label>3.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Messner B, Bernhard D. Smoking and cardiovascular disease: mechanisms of endothelial dysfunction and early atherogenesis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2014; 34(3):509–15.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B4">
        <label>4.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Venkatason P, Salleh NM, Zubairi Y, et al. The bizarre phenomenon of smokers’ paradox in the immediate outcome post acute myocardial infarction: an insight into the Malaysian National Cardiovascular Database-Acute Coronary Syndrome (NCVD-ACS) registry year 2006-2013. Springerplus 2016; 5(1):534.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B5">
        <label>5.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Symons R, Masci PG, Francone M, et al. Impact of active smoking on myocardial infarction severity in reperfused ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients: the smoker’s paradox revisited. Eur Heart J 2015; 37(35):2756–64.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B6">
        <label>6.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Mohamedali B, Shroff A. Impact of smoking status on cardiovascular outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention. Clin Cardiol 2013; 36(7):372–7.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B7">
        <label>7.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Gao K, Shi X, Wang W. The life-course impact of smoking on hypertension, myocardial infarction and respiratory diseases. Sci Rep 2017; 7(1):4330.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B8">
        <label>8.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Yadav M, Généreux P, Giustino G, et al. The smoker’s paradox revisited: a patient-level pooled analysis of 18 randomized controlled trials. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2019; 12(19):1941–50.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B9">
        <label>9.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Teo KK, Ounpuu S, Hawken S, et al. Tobacco use and risk of myocardial infarction in 52 countries in the INTERHEART study: a case-control study. Lancet 2006; 368(9536):647–58.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B10">
        <label>10.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Janjani P, Motevaseli S, Salehi N, et al. Association of admission systolic blood pressure on long-term outcomes after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. ARYA Atheroscler 2023; 19(5):43–51. <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.48305/arya.2023.41248.2859">doi: 10.48305/arya.2023.41248.2859</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B11">
        <label>11.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Van Sloten T, Valentin E, Climie RE, et al. Association of midlife cardiovascular health and subsequent change in cardiovascular health with incident cancer. JACC Cardio Oncol 2023; 5(1):39–52. <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.1016/j.jaccao.2022.11.015">doi: 10.1016/j.jaccao.2022.11.015</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B12">
        <label>12.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement. Int J Surg 2014; 12(12):1495–9.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B13">
        <label>13.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Janjani P, Salehi N, Asadmobini A, et al. Smoker pseudo-paradox in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients. Folia Med (Plovdiv) 2023; 65(2):243–50.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B14">
        <label>14.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Janjani P, Motevaseli S, Salimi Y, et al. Gender and smoking-related survival differences in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Int Cardiovasc Res J 2022; 16(3):118–22.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B15">
        <label>15.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Rakowski T, Siudak Z, Dziewierz A, et al. Impact of smoking status on outcome in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2012; 34(3):397–403.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B16">
        <label>16.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Sia CH, Ko J, Zheng H, et al. Association between smoking status and outcomes in myocardial infarction patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Sci Rep 2021; 11(1):6466. <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.1038/s41598-021-86003-w">doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86003-w</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B17">
        <label>17.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Redfors B, Furer A, Selker HP, et al. Effect of smoking on outcomes of primary PCI in patients with STEMI. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020; 75(15):1743–54.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B18">
        <label>18.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Zhang YJ, Iqbal J, van Klaveren D, et al. Smoking is associated with adverse clinical outcomes in patients undergoing revascularization with PCI or CABG: the SYNTAX trial at 5-year follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015; 65(11):1107–15.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B19">
        <label>19.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Toluey M, Ghaffari S, Tajlil A, et al. The impact of cigarette smoking on infarct location and in-hospital outcome following acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction. J Cardiovasc Thorac Res 2019;11(3):209–15.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>
