<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//TaxonX//DTD Taxonomic Treatment Publishing DTD v0 20100105//EN" "https://foliamedica.bg/nlm/tax-treatment-NS0.dtd">
<article xmlns:tp="http://www.plazi.org/taxpub" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">87</journal-id>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="index">urn:lsid:arphahub.com:pub:A116C711-4C18-5A38-8F1E-5E97753A8A64</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title xml:lang="en">Folia Medica</journal-title>
        <abbrev-journal-title xml:lang="en">FM</abbrev-journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">0204-8043</issn>
      <issn pub-type="epub">1314-2143</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Plovdiv Medical University</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3897/folmed.68.e182087</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">182087</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Research Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="scientific_subject">
          <subject>Pediatrics &amp; Genetic diseases</subject>
          <subject>Surgery &amp; Invasive treatment</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Clinicopathologic spectrum and outcomes analysis of Meckel’s diverticulum in children</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group content-type="authors">
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Shinde</surname>
            <given-names>Nandkishor</given-names>
          </name>
          <email xlink:type="simple">drnandkishorshinde@gmail.com</email>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8123-3655</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Kalaskar</surname>
            <given-names>Sunil</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Desai</surname>
            <given-names>Anup S.</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Kausar</surname>
            <given-names>Afia</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="A1">
        <label>1</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Khaja Bandanawaz University, Kalaburagi, Karnataka, India</addr-line>
        <institution>Khaja Bandanawaz University, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Kalaburagi, India</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Kalaburagi</addr-line>
        <country>India</country>
      </aff>
      <author-notes>
        <fn fn-type="corresp">
          <p><bold>Corresponding author</bold>: Nandkishor D. Shinde, 301, Block B, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Khaja Bandanawaz University, Kalaburagi, Karnataka, India-585404; Email: <email xlink:type="simple">drnandkishorshinde@gmail.com</email></p>
        </fn>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="collection">
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>30</day>
        <month>06</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>68</volume>
      <issue>3</issue>
      <elocation-id>e182087</elocation-id>
      <uri content-type="arpha" xlink:href="http://openbiodiv.net/BED31BBD-A583-59F0-A600-D593DD6B4E11">BED31BBD-A583-59F0-A600-D593DD6B4E11</uri>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>10</day>
          <month>12</month>
          <year>2025</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>11</day>
          <month>02</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Nandkishor Shinde, Sunil Kalaskar, Anup S. Desai, Afia Kausar</copyright-statement>
        <license license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple">
          <license-p>This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <abstract>
        <label>Abstract</label>
        <p><bold>Introduction</bold>: Meckel’s diverticulum is the most common congenital anomaly of the gastrointestinal system. Although often asymptomatic, it can present with a wide range of complications in children. Early diagnosis remains challenging due to nonspecific symptoms and the limited sensitivity of imaging modalities.</p>
        <p><bold>Aim</bold>: This study aims to evaluate the spectrum of clinical presentations, diagnostic approaches, surgical management, and histopathological outcomes in a pediatric population with Meckel’s diverticulum.</p>
        <p><bold>Materials and methods</bold>: This prospective cross-section observational study was carried at a tertiary care center from November 2021 to October 2025. All children under 18 years diagnosed with Meckel’s diverticulum either symptomatically or incidentally during surgery were included. Data on demographics, clinical presentation, diagnostic modalities, surgical approach, postoperative outcomes, and histopathological findings were analyzed.</p>
        <p><bold>Results</bold>: A total of 28 children were surgically treated for Meckel’s diverticulum. Male predominance was noted (71.43%), with the most affected age group being 1–5 years (42.86%). Intestinal obstruction (28.57%) was the most common presentation, followed by intussusception (21.43%) and perforation (17.86%). All patients underwent laparoscopic-assisted segmental ileal resection. Postoperative complications were minimal (7.14%), and mean hospital stay was 5.6 days. Histopathology revealed ectopic mucosa in 67.86% of cases, predominantly gastric (57.14%), with pancreatic tissue in 11.3%. Ectopic tissue was most frequently associated with perforation (100%) and intussusception (83.3%)</p>
        <p><bold>Conclusion</bold>: Meckel’s diverticulum in children presents with diverse clinical manifestations, often mimicking other acute abdominal conditions. Early surgical intervention, especially in symptomatic cases, yields favorable outcomes. The presence of ectopic mucosa correlates strongly with complications, underscoring the importance of segmental resection and routine histopathological evaluation.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <label>Keywords</label>
        <kwd>congenital anomaly</kwd>
        <kwd>diverticulitis</kwd>
        <kwd>intestinal obstruction</kwd>
        <kwd>intussusception</kwd>
        <kwd>Meckel’s diverticulum</kwd>
        <kwd>perforation</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
    <notes>
      <sec sec-type="Citation" id="sec1">
        <title>Citation</title>
        <p>Shinde ND, Kalaskar S, Desai AS, Kausar A. Clinicopathologic spectrum and outcomes analysis of Meckel’s diverticulum in children. Folia Med (Plovdiv) 2026;68(3):e182087. <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.3897/folmed.68.e182087">doi: 10.3897/folmed.68.e182087</ext-link>.</p>
      </sec>
    </notes>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec sec-type="Introduction" id="sec2">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Meckel’s diverticulum (<abbrev xlink:title="Meckel’s diverticulum">MD</abbrev>) is the most common congenital anomaly detected in the gastrointestinal system, with a prevalence of 1–3% in the general population.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>]</sup> It occurs due to the incomplete obliteration of the vitelline (omphalomesenteric) duct during the fifth to seventh week of gestation. As in true diverticulum, Meckel’s diverticulum contains all three layers of the intestinal wall, and it is typically located on the antimesenteric border of the ileum, approximately 40–100 cm proximal to the ileocecal valve.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>]</sup> Although its estimated prevalence is around 2%, the majority of cases remain asymptomatic throughout life, with only 4–6% developing complications that necessitate surgical intervention.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>]</sup></p>
      <p>In the pediatric population, Meckel’s diverticulum can present with a wide spectrum of clinical manifestations, often mimicking other acute abdominal conditions. The most common symptomatic presentations include painless lower gastrointestinal bleeding, intestinal obstruction, intussusception, diverticulitis, and, less frequently, perforation. These complications are often attributed to the presence of ectopic mucosa, most commonly gastric or pancreatic, which can lead to ulceration, inflammation, or serve as a lead point for volvulus or intussusception.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>]</sup> The diversity in presentation, along with the nonspecific symptoms, causes the significant diagnostic challenge, particularly in resource-limited settings. Preoperative diagnosis of Meckel’s diverticulum remains elusive in many cases. While technetium-99m pertechnetate scintigraphy (Meckel’s scan) is the investigation of choice, specifically for detecting ectopic gastric mucosa, its sensitivity is limited in the absence of bleeding or in cases with atypical presentations.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>]</sup> Ultrasonography and computed tomography (<abbrev xlink:title="computed tomography">CT</abbrev>) may aid in identifying complications such as obstruction or perforation but are not definitive for diagnosing Meckel’s diverticulum itself.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>]</sup> Consequently, many cases are diagnosed intraoperatively, either during exploration for acute abdomen or incidentally during unrelated procedures.</p>
      <p>Surgical resection remains the definitive treatment for Meckel’s diverticulum. The choice between simple diverticulectomy and segmental ileal resection depends on intraoperative findings, including the presence of inflammation, perforation, ischemia, or suspicion of ectopic muco- sa.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>]</sup> Laparoscopy and the minimal invasive approach have gained acceptance increasingly due to their diagnostic ability, reduced morbidity, and shorter recovery.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>]</sup></p>
      <p>Despite its clinical significance, there remains a paucity of prospective data from developing countries on the presentation, management, and outcomes of Meckel’s diverticulum in the pediatric population. This study was undertaken to bridge this gap by analyzing the clinical spectrum, diagnostic modalities, operative findings, histopathological features, and postoperative outcomes of pediatric Meckel’s diverticulum cases managed at a tertiary care center.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Aim" id="sec3">
      <title>Aim</title>
      <p>This study aims to enhance understanding of Meckel’s diverticulum’s clinical behavior, support timely diagnosis, and guide optimal surgical management strategies in pediatric patients presenting with acute abdomen or incidental Meckel’s diverticulum.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="sec4">
      <title>Materials and methods</title>
      <p>The present prospective cross-sectional observational study was carried out at a tertiary care hospital from November 2021 to October 2025. All children below 18 years who were diagnosed with Meckel’s diverticulum and underwent surgical treatment or children who found Meckel’s diverticulum incidentally during another surgery, irrespective of sex, were included in the study.</p>
      <p>From all children, data for sex, age of presentation, clinical features, diagnostic method, and surgical treatment were analyzed. Stabilization and vigorous management were undertaken before taking up children for operative management. Detailed history, complete blood count, serum creatinine level, blood urea nitrogen, and blood glucose levels were performed. Abdominal ultrasonography and computed tomography were performed in all cases. Intravenous fluids were chosen according to patient status, and all patients were empirically started on third-generation cephalosporins and metronidazole, and antibiotics were escalated based on culture and sensitivity reports. Patients were taken up for surgical management after stabilization. After excision of Meckel’s diverticulum, the specimen was sent for histopathological examination. In all children, postoperative complications, hospital stay, outcomes, and histopathological findings were recorded and were analyzed.</p>
      <sec sec-type="Statistical analysis" id="sec5">
        <title>Statistical analysis</title>
        <p>The data was entered on MS-Excel and analyzed statistically using SPSS-25. Quantitative data was analyzed as mean value ± standard deviation or median. Qualitative data was analyzed as percentages and proportions.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Ethical considerations" id="sec6">
        <title>Ethical considerations</title>
        <p>The study was done only after obtaining the local Ethics Committee’s approval. Before including participants in the study, a voluntary informed written consent for participation was obtained from his/her legally acceptable representative. Information that was obtained from patients was kept confidential and used for scientific reasons only, and no personal identity was disclosed at any point in time. There was no additional risk to patients because of their participation in the study. Participation in this study was purely on a voluntary basis.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Results" id="sec7">
      <title>Results</title>
      <p>A total of 28 cases were diagnosed with Meckel’s diverticulum and treated surgically in the tertiary care hospital during the specified study period. We noticed male predominance, with males accounting for 71.43% of all cases and 28.57% of cases being female <bold>(Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>)</bold>, with a male-to-female ratio of 2.5:1. According to the clinical presentations in all cases of diverticulitis, intestinal obstruction, intussusception, and perforation, the sex distribution was more in men <bold>(Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>)</bold>. At the time of diagnosis, the age ranged from 6 months to 17 years; the most affected age group was aged 1 to 5 years, accounting for the highest proportion of cases (42.86%), followed by those aged &gt;5 to 10 years (32.14%). Infants (&lt;1 year) represented 14.29% of cases, with a notable presence of intussusception and perforation <bold>(Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref>)</bold>.</p>
      <table-wrap id="T1" position="float" orientation="portrait">
        <label>Table 1.</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Sex distribution according to the clinical diagnosis</p>
        </caption>
        <table>
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Sex</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Intestinal obstruction</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Diverticulitis</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Perforation</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Intussusception</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Incidentally</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Total</bold>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Male</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">6</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">3</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">3</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">5</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">3</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">20 (71.43%)</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Female</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">2</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">2</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">2</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">8 (28.57%)</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Total</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">8 (28.57%)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">4 (14.29%)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">5 (17.86%)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">6 (21.43%)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">5 (17.86%)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">28</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <table-wrap id="T2" position="float" orientation="portrait">
        <label>Table 2.</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Age distribution according to the clinical diagnosis</p>
        </caption>
        <table>
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Age</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Intestinal obstruction</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Diverticulitis</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Perforation</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Intussusception</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Incidentally</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Total</bold>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">(n=8)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">(n=8)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">(n=8)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">(n=8)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">(n=8)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">(n=8)</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">&lt;1 year</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">2</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">4 (14.29%)</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1 to 5 years</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">4</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">3</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">3</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">12 (42.86%)</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">&gt;5 to 10 years</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">2</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">2</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">3</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">9 (32.14%)</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">&gt;10 years</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">3 (10.71%)</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <p>Intestinal obstruction (28.57%) was the most common pathology overall, with a 3:1 male-to-female ratio followed by intussusception (21.43%) and perforation (17.86%). Intestinal obstruction and perforation are commonly seen in 1 to 5 years; diverticulitis was rare overall but evenly distributed between &gt;5–10 years and &gt;10 years. Incidentally found cases were mostly in &gt;5–10 years (3 cases), suggesting increased incidental detection with age.</p>
      <p>In our study, in patients presenting with intestinal obstruction, the most common symptoms were vomiting (100%) and abdominal distention (100%), followed by pain (87.5%); in cases with presentation of diverticulitis, the most common symptoms were pain (100%) and fever (100%), followed by vomiting (50%); in cases presented with perforation, the most common symptoms were pain (100%), followed by vomiting (80%) and fever (60%). In cases presented with intussusception, the common symptoms were pain (100%), vomiting (100%), and lump (100%), followed by abdominal distention (83.3%). Cases of intussusception also have melena in 66.7% of cases <bold>(Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref>)</bold>. In our study, 5 cases were incidentally detected during another surgery. Two cases were detected during surgery for acute appendicitis, two were detected during surgery for malrotation of the gut, and the other was detected while performing laparotomy for congenital megacolon.</p>
      <table-wrap id="T3" position="float" orientation="portrait">
        <label>Table 3.</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Clinical features according to clinical diagnosis</p>
        </caption>
        <table>
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Clinical features</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Intestinal obstruction</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Diverticulitis</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Perforation</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Intussusception</bold>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">(n=8)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">(n=4)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">(n=5)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">(n=6)</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Pain</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">7 (87.5%)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">4 (100%)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">5 (100%)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">6 (100%)</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Vomiting</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">8 (100%)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">2 (50%)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">4 (80%)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">6 (100%)</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Abdominal distention</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">8 (100%)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0 (0%)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0 (0%)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">5 (83.3%)</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Fever</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1 (12.5%)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">4 (100%)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">3 (60%)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">4 (66.7%)</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Lump</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0 (0%)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0 (0%)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0 (0%)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">6 (100%)</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Melena</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1 (12.5%)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0 (0%)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0 (0%)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">4 (66.7%)</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <p>Abdominal ultrasonography and computed tomography (<abbrev xlink:title="computed tomography">CT</abbrev>) scans were performed in all cases. Meckel’s scan was performed in only 4 cases with diverticulitis, and all 4 (100%) showed a positive tracer.</p>
      <p>During surgery, all cases of intestinal obstruction had obstruction due to Meckel’s band attached to the umbilicus; diverticulitis cases had inflamed Meckel’s with a fecalith in one case; perforation was most common near the tip in 3 (60%) cases; and in all cases of intussusception, Meckel’s diverticulum was the leading point.</p>
      <p>Meckel’s diverticulum was located 25 cm to 80 cm proximal to the ileocecal valve, at the antimesenteric border of the ileum, with a mean of 59.6 cm from the ileocecal valve. The size of Meckel’s diverticulum ranged from 1.5 cm to 15 cm with a mean of 4.5 cm, and a diameter of 0.5 to 4 cm with a mean of 1.8 cm.</p>
      <p>All patients underwent laparoscopic-assisted segmental ileal resection with anastomosis, as most diverticula were associated with inflammation or ischemic changes and a high likelihood of ectopic tissue.</p>
      <p>There were only 2 cases of wound infections postoperatively, which were managed with dressing. The mean hospital stay was 5.6 days.</p>
      <p>On histopathological study, ectopic tissue was noticed in 19 (67.86%) cases. Gastric mucosa was noticed in 16 cases (57.14%), pancreatic tissue was in 1 (4.2%), and both gastric and pancreatic tissue were seen in 2 (7.14%) cases. According to the presentation, ectopic tissue was most observed in 100% (5) of cases with perforation followed by intussusception (83.3%) and diverticulitis (75%) <bold>(Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">4</xref>)</bold>.</p>
      <table-wrap id="T4" position="float" orientation="portrait">
        <label>Table 4.</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Diagnosis and surgical treatment outcome </p>
        </caption>
        <table>
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Diagnosis</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Intestinal obstruction</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Diverticulitis</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Perforation</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Intussusception</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Incidentally</bold>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">(n=8)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">(n=4)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">(n=5)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">(n=6)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">(n=5)</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Surgical treatment</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Laparoscopic-assisted bowel resection and anastomosis</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Laparoscopic-assisted bowel resection and anastomosis</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Laparoscopic-assisted bowel resection and anastomosis</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Laparoscopic-assisted bowel resection and anastomosis</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Laparoscopic-assisted bowel resection and anastomosis</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Ectopic tissue</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">5 (62.5%)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">3 (75%)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">5 (100%)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">5 (83.3%)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1 (20%)</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Discussion" id="sec8">
      <title>Discussion</title>
      <p>Meckel’s diverticulum (<abbrev xlink:title="Meckel’s diverticulum">MD</abbrev>), the most prevalent congenital anomaly, although often asymptomatic, can present with a wide range of complications in pediatric patients, including intestinal obstruction, intussusception, diverticulitis, and perforation, as observed in our cohort.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>]</sup> The rule of 2 is commonly used to describe Meckel’s diverticulum and refers to a male-to-female ratio of 2:1, a prevalence of 2%, an incidence of 2%, a symptomatic rate of 2%, a diverticular length of 2 inches, the occurrence of symptoms before 2 years of age, the location of diverticulum 2 feet from the ileocecal valve, and 2 common types of ectopic tissues.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>]</sup></p>
      <p>Male predominance (71.43%) in our study aligns with previous literature.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>]</sup>, where symptomatic Meckel’s diverticulum is more frequently reported in males.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>]</sup> The most affected age group was 1–5 years, consistent with the peak incidence of symptomatic presentations in early child- hood.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>]</sup></p>
      <p>The peak incidence in the 1–5 year age group aligns with prior findings by Soltero and Bill<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>]</sup>, who noted that most symptomatic cases occur before the age of 10 years. The clinical presentation of Meckel’s diverticulum is nonspecific and diverse, which makes diagnosis difficult. However, children with complicated Meckel’s diverticulum can present as a surgical emergency with diverticulitis, intesti- nal obstruction, intussusception, and gastrointestinal bleeding.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>]</sup> Intestinal obstruction emerged as the most common presentation (28.57%), followed by intussusception and perforation. This distribution mirrors findings from Park et al.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>]</sup>, who reported obstruction as the leading complication in children, often due to fibrous bands or volvulus around the Meckel’s diverticulum.</p>
      <p>Intussusception (21.43%) was the second most common presentation, with Meckel’s diverticulum serving as a pathological lead point in all cases. This finding corroborates studies that identify Meckel’s diverticulum as a frequent lead point in non-idiopathic intussusception, particularly in children over 2 years of age.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>]</sup> The presence of ectopic gastric mucosa in 67.86% of cases, particularly in perforation and intussusception, reinforces the pathogenic role of acid secretion in mucosal injury and ulceration.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>]</sup></p>
      <p>Diagnostic imaging remains challenging despite the availability of the modern imaging modalities. While ultrasonography was widely used, it remains a useful first-line tool, particularly in cases of obstruction or intussusception. <abbrev xlink:title="computed tomography">CT</abbrev> and technetium-99m pertechnetate radionuclide scans are largely used in the diagnosis of Meckel’s diverticu- lum.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>]</sup><abbrev xlink:title="computed tomography">CT</abbrev> imaging was selectively employed and aided in identifying complications such as perforation or inflammation, consistent with its role in complex or atypical presentations. Despite its limited use, Meckel’s scan demonstrated 100% sensitivity in detecting ectopic gastric mucosa in our diverticulitis cases. This supports its utility in selected cases, especially those with painless rectal bleeding or suspected ectopic mucosa. However, its low usage reflects real-world limitations, including availability and false negatives in non-bleeding presentations.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>]</sup> Future studies should focus on refining diagnostic algorithms and exploring the role of routine Meckel’s scan in selected pediatric populations.</p>
      <p>Surgical management via laparoscopic-assisted bowel resection was uniformly adopted. This strategy is increasingly favored over simple diverticulectomy due to the risk of ectopic mucosa in the adjacent ileum and potential for missed pathology and due to associated inflammation and ischemia. This approach is increasingly favored for its diagnostic and therapeutic benefits, especially in uncertain presentations. The low rate of postoperative complications (7.14%) and short mean hospital stay (5.6 days) affirm the safety and efficacy of this approach.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>]</sup></p>
      <p>In our study, 5 (17.86%) cases were incidentally discovered during unrelated surgeries, underscoring the ongoing debate about prophylactic resection. While some advocate for resection to prevent future complications<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>]</sup> others caution against unnecessary surgery in asymptomatic cases<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>]</sup>. Cullen et al.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>]</sup> noticed that the risk of asymptomatic Meckel’s diverticulum becoming symptomatic did not decrease with age and recommended prophylactic resection. Our findings suggest that incidental Meckel’s diverticulum, especially in older children, may harbor ectopic mucosa and warrant careful intraoperative assessment.</p>
      <p>Histopathological examination revealed gastric mucosa in 57.14%, pancreatic tissue in 4.2%, and dual ectopia in 7.14%. These findings are consistent with prior reports indicating gastric heterotopia as the most common ectopic tissue, with pancreatic tissue being rare.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>]</sup> The strong association between ectopic mucosa and complications, particularly perforation (100%) and intussusception (83.3%), highlights the pathogenic role of acid secretion and mucosal ulceration. The association of ectopic tissue and symptomatic presentations, especially diverticulitis, perforation, and intussusception, emphasizes the importance of routine histopathological examination. Burjonrappa and Khaing<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>]</sup> reported that the existence of ectopic tissue is the most important factor deciding the necessity of a surgical intervention in Meckel’s diverticulum.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Limitations" id="sec9">
      <title>Limitations</title>
      <p>This study had a small sample size and was conducted in a single center. A multicenter study with a large sample size is required to validate results.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Conclusion" id="sec10">
      <title>Conclusion</title>
      <p>This prospective study reinforces the varied clinical manifestations of Meckel’s diverticulum in children with intestinal obstruction and intussusception being the most common. The presence of ectopic mucosa significantly correlates with complications, justifying segmental resection over diverticulectomy. Early surgical intervention, guided by clinical suspicion and supported by imaging, remains the cornerstone of management, especially in symptomatic cases. Laparoscopic or laparoscopic-assisted bowel resection remains a safe and effective treatment modality.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="B1">
        <label>1.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Lin XK, Huang XZ, Bao XZ, et al. Clinical characteristics of Meckel diverticulum in children: a retrospective review of a 15-year single-center experience. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017; 96:e7760. <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.1097/MD.0000000000007760">doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007760</ext-link>; <ext-link ext-link-type="pmid" xlink:href="28796070">PMID: 28796070</ext-link>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B2">
        <label>2.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Rattan KN, Singh J, Dalal P, et al. Meckel’s diverticulum in children: our 12-year experience. Afr J Paediatr Surg 2016; 13:170–4. <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.4103/0189-6725.194671">doi: 10.4103/0189-6725.194671</ext-link>; <ext-link ext-link-type="pmid" xlink:href="28051045">PMID: 28051045</ext-link>; PMCID: <ext-link ext-link-type="pmcid" xlink:href="PMC5154221">PMC5154221</ext-link>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B3">
        <label>3.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Chen Q, Gao Z, Zhang L, et al. Multifaceted behavior of Meckel’s diverticulum in children. J Pediatr Surg 2018; 53:676–81. <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.11.059">doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.11.059</ext-link>; <ext-link ext-link-type="pmid" xlink:href="29331260">PMID: 29331260</ext-link>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B4">
        <label>4.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Redman EP, Mishra PR, Stringer MD. Laparoscopic diverticulectomy or laparoscopic-assisted resection of symptomatic Meckel diverticulum in children? A systematic review. Pediatr Surg Int 2020; 36:869–74. <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.1007/s00383-020-04673-5">doi: 10.1007/s00383-020-04673-5</ext-link>; <ext-link ext-link-type="pmid" xlink:href="32436063">PMID: 32436063</ext-link>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B5">
        <label>5.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Sinha CK, Pallewatte A, Easty M, et al. Meckel’s scan in children: a review of 183 cases referred to two pediatric surgery specialist centers over 18 years. Pediatr Surg Int 2013; 29:511-7. <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.1007/s00383-013-3270-3">doi: 10.1007/s00383-013-3270-3</ext-link>; <ext-link ext-link-type="pmid" xlink:href="23417523">PMID: 23417523</ext-link>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B6">
        <label>6.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Shin HW, Kang YN, Park J. Clinicopathologic characteristics and treatment outcomes of symptomatic Meckel’s diverticulum in children. Adv Pediatr Surg 2021; 27(1):8–14. <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.13029/aps.2021.27.1.8">doi: 10.13029/aps.2021.27.1.8</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B7">
        <label>7.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Duan X, Ye G, Bian H, et al. Laparoscopic vs. laparoscopically assisted management of Meckel’s diverticulum in children. Int J Clin Exp Med 2015; 8:94–100. <ext-link ext-link-type="pmid" xlink:href="25784978">PMID: 25784978</ext-link>; PMCID: <ext-link ext-link-type="pmcid" xlink:href="PMC4358433">PMC4358433</ext-link>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B8">
        <label>8.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Ezekian B, Leraas HJ, Englum BR, et al. Outcomes of laparoscopic resection of Meckel’s diverticulum are equivalent to open laparotomy. J Pediatr Surg 2019; 54:507–10. <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.03.010">doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.03.010</ext-link>; <ext-link ext-link-type="pmid" xlink:href="29661575">PMID: 29661575</ext-link>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B9">
        <label>9.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Srisan N, Songsiri P, Liukitithara S, et al. Meckel’s diverticulum: differences in clinical features between children and adults. Pediatr Surg Int 2025; 41:284. <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.1007/s00383-025-06183-8">doi: 10.1007/s00383-025-06183-8</ext-link>; <ext-link ext-link-type="pmid" xlink:href="40906021">PMID: 40906021</ext-link>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B10">
        <label>10.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Huang CC, Lai MW, Hwang FM, et al. Diverse presentations in pediatric Meckel’s diverticulum: a review of 100 cases. Pediatr Neonatol 2014; 55:369–75. <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.1016/j.pedneo.2013.12.005">doi: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2013.12.005</ext-link>; <ext-link ext-link-type="pmid" xlink:href="24685339">PMID: 24685339</ext-link>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B11">
        <label>11.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Soltero MJ, Bill AH. The natural history of Meckel’s diverticulum and its relation to incidental removal. Am J Surg 1976; 132(2):168–73. <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.1016/0002-9610(76)90043-x">doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(76)90043-x</ext-link>; <ext-link ext-link-type="pmid" xlink:href="952346">PMID: 952346</ext-link>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B12">
        <label>12.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Park JJ, Wolff BG, Tollefson MK, et al. Meckel diverticulum: the Mayo Clinic experience with 1476 patients (1950-2002). Ann Surg 2005; 241(3):529–33. <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.1097/01.sla.0000154270.14308.5f">doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000154270.14308.5f</ext-link>; <ext-link ext-link-type="pmid" xlink:href="15729078">PMID: 15729078</ext-link>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B13">
        <label>13.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Burjonrappa S, Khaing P. Meckel’s diverticulum and ectopic epithelium: Evaluation of a complex relationship. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg 2014; 19:85–9. <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.4103/0971-9261.129601">doi: 10.4103/0971-9261.129601</ext-link>; <ext-link ext-link-type="pmid" xlink:href="24741211">PMID: 24741211</ext-link>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B14">
        <label>14.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Zhang TT, Zhou XG, Cai P, et al. Comparison of clinical manifestations and immunoreactivities of Meckel’s diverticulum with and without gastric heteroplasia. Front Pediatr 2025; 13:1617214. <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.3389/fped.2025.1617214">doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1617214</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B15">
        <label>15.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Cullen JJ, Kelly KA, Moir CR, et al. Surgical management of Meckel’s diverticulum. An epidemiologic, population-based study. Ann Surg 1994; 220:564–8. <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.1097/00000658-199410000-00014">doi: 10.1097/00000658-199410000-00014</ext-link>; <ext-link ext-link-type="pmid" xlink:href="7944666">PMID: 7944666</ext-link>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B16">
        <label>16.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Zani A, Eaton S, Rees CM, et al. Incidentally detected Meckel diverticulum: to resect or not to resect? Ann Surg 2008; 247(2):276–81. <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.1097/SLA.0b013e31815aaaf8">doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31815aaaf8</ext-link>; <ext-link ext-link-type="pmid" xlink:href="18216533">PMID: 18216533</ext-link>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
    <sec sec-type="Additional information" id="sec11">
      <title>Additional information</title>
      <p>
        <bold>Ethical statements</bold>
      </p>
      <list list-type="bullet">
        <list-item>
          <p>This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medical Sciences in Khaja Bandanawaz University (IEC NO: KBNU-FM/IES/2021/142).
</p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>The authors declared that no clinical trials were used in the present study.
</p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>The authors declared that no experiments on humans or human tissues were performed for the present study.
</p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>Written informed consent was obtained from the legal guardians of all children involved in the study.
</p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>The authors declared that no experiments on animals were performed for the present study.
</p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>The authors declared that no commercially available immortalized human and animal cell lines were used in the present study.
</p>
        </list-item>
      </list>
      <p>
        <bold>Conflict of interest</bold>
      </p>
      <p>The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.</p>
      <p>
        <bold>Artificial Intelligence (AI) use</bold>
      </p>
      <p>The authors accept full responsibility for the content of the manuscript, including the disclosure of any use of AI. No AI tools were used in the preparation of this manuscript.</p>
      <p>
        <bold>Funding</bold>
      </p>
      <p>No funding was reported.</p>
      <p>
        <bold>Author contributions</bold>
      </p>
      <p>NDS: conceptualization, methodology, writing–original draft preparation, writing–review and editing, supervision; SK: conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, data curation, writing–original draft preparation, writing–review and editing, supervision; ASD: writing–review and editing, supervision; AK: methodology, formal analysis, data curation, editing. All authors contributed to the study conception and design. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.</p>
      <p>
        <bold>Author ORCIDs</bold>
      </p>
      <p>Nandkishor Shinde <ext-link xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8123-3655" ext-link-type="uri">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8123-3655</ext-link></p>
      <p>
        <bold>Data availability</bold>
      </p>
      <p>All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.</p>
    </sec>
  </back>
</article>
