<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//TaxonX//DTD Taxonomic Treatment Publishing DTD v0 20100105//EN" "https://foliamedica.bg/nlm/tax-treatment-NS0.dtd">
<article xmlns:tp="http://www.plazi.org/taxpub" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">87</journal-id>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="index">urn:lsid:arphahub.com:pub:A116C711-4C18-5A38-8F1E-5E97753A8A64</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title xml:lang="en">Folia Medica</journal-title>
        <abbrev-journal-title xml:lang="en">FM</abbrev-journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">0204-8043</issn>
      <issn pub-type="epub">1314-2143</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Plovdiv Medical University</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3897/folmed.68.e183527</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">183527</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Research Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="scientific_subject">
          <subject>Anesthesiology</subject>
          <subject>Pediatrics &amp; Genetic diseases</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Non-invasive mechanical ventilation in children: a four-year retrospective review</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group content-type="authors">
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Bozadzhieva</surname>
            <given-names>Lilia</given-names>
          </name>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9573-0838</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Ilarionova</surname>
            <given-names>Lyubomila</given-names>
          </name>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6145-0157</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Teneva</surname>
            <given-names>Tania</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Zdravkov</surname>
            <given-names>Blagomir</given-names>
          </name>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0644-8748</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Petrova</surname>
            <given-names>Guergana</given-names>
          </name>
          <email xlink:type="simple">gal_ps@yahoo.co.uk</email>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8168-742X</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A2">2</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A3">3</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="A1">
        <label>1</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Prof. Ivan Mitev University Pediatric Hospital for Active Treatment, Sofia, Bulgaria</addr-line>
        <institution>Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Prof. Ivan Mitev University Pediatric Hospital for Active Treatment</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Sofia</addr-line>
        <country>Bulgaria</country>
      </aff>
      <aff id="A2">
        <label>2</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria</addr-line>
        <institution>Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of Sofia</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Sofia</addr-line>
        <country>Bulgaria</country>
        <uri content-type="ror">https://ror.org/01n9zy652</uri>
      </aff>
      <aff id="A3">
        <label>3</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">Pediatric Clinic, Alexandrovska University Hospital, Sofia, Bulgaria</addr-line>
        <institution>Pediatric Clinic, Alexandrovska University Hospital</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Sofia</addr-line>
        <country>Bulgaria</country>
        <uri content-type="ror">https://ror.org/04b8y3f13</uri>
      </aff>
      <author-notes>
        <fn fn-type="corresp">
          <p><bold>Corresponding author</bold>: Guergana Petrova, Pediatric Clinic, Alexandrovska University Hospital, 1 G. Sofijski Blvd., Sofia, Bulgaria; Email: <email xlink:type="simple">gal_ps@yahoo.co.uk</email>; Tel: +359 889 751 165</p>
        </fn>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="collection">
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>31</day>
        <month>08</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>68</volume>
      <issue>4</issue>
      <elocation-id>e183527</elocation-id>
      <uri content-type="arpha" xlink:href="http://openbiodiv.net/50AA6216-42B7-5B50-9311-E13BFA4D0739">50AA6216-42B7-5B50-9311-E13BFA4D0739</uri>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>25</day>
          <month>12</month>
          <year>2025</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>11</day>
          <month>02</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Lilia Bozadzhieva, Lyubomila Ilarionova, Tania Teneva, Blagomir Zdravkov, Guergana Petrova</copyright-statement>
        <license license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple">
          <license-p>This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <abstract>
        <p>
          <bold>Abstract</bold>
        </p>
        <p><bold>Introduction</bold>: Non-invasive ventilation (<abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev>) is becoming more common in the treatment of respiratory failure in children, but its effectiveness varies with the severity of the underlying disease.</p>
        <p><bold>Aim</bold>: The study’s objective was to assess, over a four-year period, the indications, physiological effects, and clinical outcomes of <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> in children admitted to a pediatric intensive care unit (<abbrev xlink:title="pediatric intensive care unit">PICU</abbrev>) with acute or chronic respiratory failure.</p>
        <p><bold>Materials and methods</bold>: This retrospective, single-center study included 25 children who received <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> between 2021 and 2025. Demographic data, underlying diagnoses, type of respiratory failure, inflammatory markers, radiological findings, <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> interface, gas exchange parameters before and after <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev>, and clinical outcomes were analyzed.</p>
        <p><bold>Results</bold>: The median age was 3.9 years (range 0–17), with 68% being male. Neuromuscular disorders were the leading indication (55%), followed by primary pulmonary disease (37%). Spinal muscular atrophy type 1 was the most common specific diagnosis. Interface use was age-dependent: infants predominantly received nasal masks/prongs, while older children used oronasal or full-face masks. <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> produced significant improvements in gas exchange (<italic>p</italic>&lt;0.05), indicating effective correction of respiratory acidosis and hypoxemia. Radiology and inflammatory markers distinguished two clinical phenotypes. Children with primary respiratory disease, genetic syndromes, or systemic comorbidities frequently showed pneumonic infiltrates and markedly elevated <abbrev xlink:title="C-reactive protein">CRP</abbrev>/<abbrev xlink:title="procalcitonin">PCT</abbrev>, indicating infection-driven respiratory failure. In contrast, neuromuscular patients demonstrated minimal inflammatory elevation and chronic or atelectatic radiographic patterns, consistent with ventilatory pump failure. The S/F ratio at initiation strongly predicted outcome: all children with an S/F ratio &lt;150 experienced <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> failure or death, whereas those with an S/F ratio &gt;250 showed successful recovery. <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> duration was longest in neuromuscular disorders (mean 48 days), reflecting chronic ventilatory insufficiency.</p>
        <p><bold>Conclusion</bold>: <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> is effective in improving gas exchange in both acute and chronic respiratory failure in children. Clinical outcome depends on underlying diagnoses, inflammatory activity, radiologic pattern, and initial oxygenation status. The S/F ratio is a reliable predictor of <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> success.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <label>Keywords</label>
        <kwd>interface</kwd>
        <kwd>neuromuscular disease</kwd>
        <kwd>respiratory failure</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
    <notes>
      <sec sec-type="" id="sec1">
        <title/>
        <p>Bozadzhieva L, Ilarionova L, Teneva T, Zdravkov B, Petrova G. Non-invasive mechanical ventilation in children: a four-year retrospective review. Folia Med (Plovdiv) 2026;68(4):е183527. <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.3897/folmed.68.e183527">doi: 10.3897/folmed.68.e183527</ext-link>.</p>
      </sec>
    </notes>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec sec-type="Introduction" id="sec2">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Non-invasive mechanical ventilation (<abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev>) has been used more often in pediatric critical care during the last 20 years. It is now considered a first-line modality for respiratory support, aiming to avoid the complications associated with invasive mechanical ventilation (<abbrev xlink:title="invasive mechanical ventilation">IMV</abbrev>). <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> provides ventilatory assistance through external interfaces without the need for endotracheal intubation or tracheostomy. The complications of <abbrev xlink:title="invasive mechanical ventilation">IMV</abbrev>, such as ventilator-associated pneumonia (<abbrev xlink:title="ventilator-associated pneumonia">VAP</abbrev>), ventilator-induced lung injury (<abbrev xlink:title="ventilator-induced lung injury">VILI</abbrev>), and airway injury, are well documented and contribute to substantial morbidity and mortality among critically ill children. In comparison, <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> offers the major advantage of avoiding airway-related trauma. <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> reduces the need for sedation, shortens the duration of mechanical support, and is associated with fewer nosocomial infections and a reduced length of stay in the pediatric intensive care unit (<abbrev xlink:title="pediatric intensive care unit">PICU</abbrev>).</p>
      <p>In the last 20 years, several studies have demonstrated that <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> is an effective and safe alternative to <abbrev xlink:title="invasive mechanical ventilation">IMV</abbrev> in selected pediatric populations.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>]</sup> It has shown particular benefits in patients with acute respiratory failure due to pneumonia, bronchiolitis, asthma, and acute exacerbations of chronic lung disease. <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> is also well established in children with chronic neuromuscular disorders or restrictive chest wall disease, in whom it provides long-term ventilatory assistance and prevents progressive hypercapnia. In such cases long-term <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> can improve quality of life and reduce morbidity.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>]</sup> However, the success of <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> depends heavily on timely initiation, appropriate interface selection, optimal ventilator settings, and continuous monitoring to detect early signs of failure.</p>
      <p>Despite the growing studies of evidence, the use of <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> in children remains challenging due to the heterogeneity of underlying diseases, variable age-related anatomy, and the need for cooperation from both patients and caregivers. Data on the effectiveness of <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> in mixed pediatric populations are still limited.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Aim" id="sec3">
      <title>Aim</title>
      <p>The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and outcomes of non-invasive ventilation (<abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev>) in children admitted to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (<abbrev xlink:title="pediatric intensive care unit">PICU</abbrev>) with acute or chronic respiratory failure over a four-year period.</p>
      <p>In this study, efficacy of <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> refers to the immediate physiological response to therapy, assessed by improvements in gas exchange and acid–base balance following <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> initiation, including changes in pH, PaCO<sub>2</sub>, PaO<sub>2</sub>, oxygen saturation, and the SpO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> (S/F) ratio.</p>
      <p>Clinical outcome, in contrast, describes the overall patient course and final status after <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> therapy and was evaluated by clinically relevant endpoints such as <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> success or failure, need for intubation or invasive mechanical ventilation, survival, duration of <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev>, requirement for long-term or home ventilation, and discharge status.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="sec4">
      <title>Material and methods</title>
      <p>We conducted a retrospective study on all consecutive children who required non-invasive mechanical ventilation in the <abbrev xlink:title="pediatric intensive care unit">PICU</abbrev> of the Professor Ivan Mitev University Pediatric Hospital for Active Treatment in Sofia, Bulgaria, from January 2021 to February 2025. All patients were admitted with respiratory failure, defined by hypoxemia (arterial oxygen saturation &lt;90% or PaO<sub>2</sub> &lt;60 mmHg on room air) with or without hypercapnia (PaCO<sub>2</sub>&gt;50 mmHg), or a combination of both, accompanied by clinical signs of respiratory distress.</p>
      <p>We used the electronic register record of patients admitted to our <abbrev xlink:title="pediatric intensive care unit">PICU</abbrev>. Assisted ventilation was used for 53 patients; among them, 25 patients (47%) required <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> for respiratory support. The extracted data included demographic characteristics of the patients, type of respiratory failure, clinical diagnosis, and laboratory results at the initiation and after <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> therapy. The decision of instituting the <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> was made by a <abbrev xlink:title="pediatric intensive care unit">PICU</abbrev> physician. <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> was considered as a treatment when the patient presented with respiratory failure, either hypercapnia (PCO<sub>2</sub>&gt;50 mmHg) or hy- poxemia (oxygen saturation &lt;90%) or both SpO<sub>2</sub> was measured non-invasively by continuous pulse oximetry. Blood gas analysis was used to assess the PaCO<sub>2</sub> and PaO<sub>2</sub> levels from arterialized capillary or arterial samples at admission, 1 hour and 2 hours after the start of noninvasive ventilation, and thereafter every 6–12 hours or as clinically indica- ted. Arterialized capillary blood gas analysis was used as the primary tool for monitoring pH, pCO<sub>2</sub>, and HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>–</sup> trends, acknowledging its close correlation with arterial values for these parameters in hemodynamically stable patients. For the precise assessment of oxygenation status (PaO<sub>2</sub>), arterial samples were drawn when clinically indicated. Values recorded immediately before <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> initiation and the first stable values obtained after <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> initiation were used.</p>
      <p>Exclusion criteria were a Glasgow Coma Scale (<abbrev xlink:title="Glasgow Coma Scale">GCS</abbrev>) of less than 8 or altered mental status in previously normal patients and cardiocirculatory instability.</p>
      <p>In our pediatric intensive care unit (<abbrev xlink:title="pediatric intensive care unit">PICU</abbrev>), only conventional invasive ventilators with a dedicated non-invasive ventilation mode are available for use. The initial ventilator settings applied in our unit are detailed in <bold>Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref></bold>. These parameters were selected in accordance with current published guidelines.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>]</sup></p>
      <table-wrap id="T1" position="float" orientation="portrait">
        <label>Table 1.</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Initial ventilator settings applied in our unit</p>
        </caption>
        <table>
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Parameter</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Value</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Special recommendation</bold>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Peak pressure / Pressure support</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">8–10 cmH<sub>2</sub>O</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Up to 14–20 cmH<sub>2</sub>O may provide greater improvement in respiratory failure</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Tidal volume</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">8–10 mL/kg (with minimal leakage)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Up to 15–30 mL/kg in volume-controlled modes, according to chest wall expansion and patient tolerance</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">PEEP</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">4 cmH<sub>2</sub>O</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">In patients with hypoventilation and/or atelectasis, PEEP may be increased up to a maximum of 6–10 cmH<sub>2</sub>O</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Inspiratory time</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.2–0.5 s</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">—</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Respiratory frequency</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">2–5 breaths/min below the patient’s spontaneous rate</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">For controlled, assisted/controlled, and SIMV modes</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">FiO<sub>2</sub></td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.21–1.0</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Adjusted according to oxygen saturation</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Ramp slope, flow speed, and inspiratory delay</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Adjusted based on patient tolerance</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Younger patients require lower flow and a slower ramp at initiation</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Inspiratory sensitivity</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Flow trigger (as low as possible)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">—</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Expiratory sensitivity</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">40–70% of the maximum inspiratory flow</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Depending on leakage</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <p>The primary ventilation modes employed were pressure-controlled ventilation (<abbrev xlink:title="pressure-controlled ventilation">PCV</abbrev>) and pressure support ventilation (<abbrev xlink:title="pressure support ventilation">PSV</abbrev>). <abbrev xlink:title="pressure-controlled ventilation">PCV</abbrev> is often favored for its superior compensation of air leaks and is generally well-tolerated. Conversely, <abbrev xlink:title="pressure support ventilation">PSV</abbrev> offers improved patient–ventilator synchrony and a greater ability to adapt to the patient’s own respiratory effort. The application of continuous positive airway pressure (<abbrev xlink:title="continuous positive airway pressure">CPAP</abbrev>) was reserved for specific indications, namely obstructive sleep apnea and bronchiolitis. Collected data included demographic variables (age and sex), primary clinical diagnoses, and the type and duration of <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev>. The progress included the need for intubation and home ventilation. Patient’s response was assessed by oxygen saturation and blood gas analysis. Data were collected from electronic patient records before and after <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> initiation.</p>
      <sec sec-type="Statistical analysis" id="sec5">
        <title>Statistical analysis</title>
        <p>Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (<abbrev xlink:title="Statistical Package for Social Sciences">SPSS</abbrev> version 19), which was used for data entry and analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data. For comparisons between several groups, a one-way analysis of variance (<abbrev xlink:title="one-way analysis of variance">ANOVA</abbrev>) followed by a Dunnett post-hoc test was used for normally distributed data, while the Kruskal–Wallis H test followed by a pairwise Mann–Whitney U test was used for non-normally distributed data. For categorical variables, group associations were analyzed using the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test if the expected frequencies were low. A <italic>p</italic>-value &lt;0.05 was considered statistically significant in all analyses.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Results" id="sec6">
      <title>Results</title>
      <p>A total of 25 children received non-invasive ventilation (<abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev>) during the study period. The mean age was 6.1±6.4 years, with a median of 3.9 years (range: 0–17), reflecting a heterogeneous pediatric population. The male sex was predominant (17 boys, 68%) compared with the female (8 girls, 32%).</p>
      <p><abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> was primarily applied in cases of neurological disorders (55%) and primary pulmonary diseases (37%). The leading cause of respiratory failure was generalized muscle hypotonia (11 children, 44%), followed by cerebral palsy (14%) and spastic quadriparesis (7%). The most frequent specific diagnosis was type 1 spinal muscular atrophy (<abbrev xlink:title="spinal muscular atrophy">SMA</abbrev>), was observed in five children (20%). Additional etiologies included genetic syndromes (n=3), epileptic encephalopathies (n=2), and myasthenia gravis (n=2). Specific genetic diagnoses among patients with neurological disabilities included Cockayne syndrome, as well as muscle hypotonia associated with both Down syndrome and Prader–Willi syndrome. In <bold>Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref></bold> we present the patients according to their primary respiratory diagnosis, leading to <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> and associated underlying conditions. Pneumonia was the most frequent diagnosis, accounting for 52% of cases (13/25), followed by respiratory failure in 48% (12/25). The most common comorbidities were spinal muscular atrophy and genetic syndromes. Overall, the cohort is characterized by a high prevalence of chronic neurological, genetic, and systemic conditions contributing to respiratory morbidity.</p>
      <table-wrap id="T2" position="float" orientation="portrait">
        <label>Table 2.</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Distribution of the patients according the leading cause for <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> and underlying conditions</p>
        </caption>
        <table>
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Diagnosis leading to <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev></bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Underlying condition</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Count</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Percentage</bold>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="5" colspan="1">Pneumonia</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Cerebral palsy</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">4</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">16%</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Muscle hypotonia</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">2</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">8%</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Myasthenia gravis</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">2</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">8%</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Obesity</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">4%</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Cystic fibrosis</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">2</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">8%</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="2">Total for pneumonia</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">11</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">44%</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="3" colspan="1">Respiratory failure</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Spinal muscular atrophy</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">5</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">20%</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Oncology</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">3</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">12%</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Genetic syndrome</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">4</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">16%</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="2">Total for respiratory failure</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">12</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">48%</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Bronchiolitis</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">None</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">4%</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Pulmonary edema</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Cardiac failure</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">4%</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="2">Total</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">25</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">100%</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <p>The most commonly used <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> interface was the oronasal mask (36%), followed by the full-face mask (32%) and nasal prongs or nasal mask (28%). A single patient required alternating interfaces due to facial dysmorphism. The choice of interface correlated strongly with age—nasal masks or prongs were predominantly used in infants &lt;1 year of age, and oronasal and full-face masks were preferred in older children (&gt;6 years) <bold>(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1</xref>)</bold>.</p>
      <fig id="F1">
        <object-id content-type="arpha">4D83CA10-FA71-5791-A49C-927CB4E7636D</object-id>
        <label>Figure 1.</label>
        <caption>
          <p><abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> interface distribution and mean age of patients.</p>
        </caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="foliamedica-68-4-e183527-g001.jpg" id="oo_1761355.jpg">
          <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1761355</uri>
        </graphic>
      </fig>
      <p>The analysis of blood gas (BG) parameters before and after <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> demonstrated a clear physiological improvement <bold>(Tables 3</bold> and <bold>4)</bold>. Blood gases were analyzed from capillary samples, with arterial blood gas analysis performed when necessary.</p>
      <p>In our cohort of 25 children on <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev>, 2 (8%) met criteria for type 1 hypoxemic respiratory failure, 6 (24%) for type 2 hypercapnic respiratory failure, and 17 (68%) showed mixed or compensated gas profiles <bold>(Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">4</xref>)</bold>. Before <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> initiation, the mean pH was 7.35±0.11, indicating mild acidemia with partial metabolic compensation. The mean partial pressure of carbon dioxide, pCO<sub>2</sub> was 60.5±29.7 mmHg, reflecting moderate hypercapnia, and the partial pressure of oxygen, pO<sub>2</sub>, averaged 82.5±35.8 mmHg, consistent with mild hypoxemia <bold>(Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref>)</bold>. The average pH of 7.35 before therapy is close to the normal range (7.35–7.45), suggesting partial compensation. The gas exchanges parameter—pCO<sub>2</sub> and pO<sub>2</sub>—before <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev>, showed moderate hypercapnia with mean pCO<sub>2</sub> ≈ 60 mmHg with substantial interindividual variability (SD ≈ 30 mmHg), consistent with a heterogeneous population ranging from mild to severe ventilatory failure. The mean pO<sub>2</sub> (82 mmHg) denoted borderline hypoxemia, though individual values varied widely, indicating that some patients were adequately oxygenated while others presented with significant hypoxemia. Levels of HCO<sub>3</sub>- and base excess (<abbrev xlink:title="base excess">BE</abbrev>) were within or slightly above the normal range, implying a degree of metabolic compensation for chronic CO<sub>2</sub> retention.</p>
      <table-wrap id="T3" position="float" orientation="portrait">
        <label>Table 3.</label>
        <caption>
          <p><abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> interface distribution according to the type of respiratory failure and current recommendations. The choice of <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> interface depends on age and type of respiratory failure.</p>
        </caption>
        <table>
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Type of respiratory failure (n)</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Acid-Base Profile (before <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev>)</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Dominant pathophysiology</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Most frequently used interface</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Typical patient age</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Recommended interface according to age and type of respiratory failure</bold>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"><bold>Type 1 (hypoxemic)</bold> (n=2; 8%)  (pO<sub>2</sub>&lt;60 mmHg, pCO<sub>2</sub>≤45 mmHg)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">pH ≈ 7.35±0.03 pCO<sub>2</sub> ≈ 29.7±6.7 mmHg HCO<sub>3</sub>– ≈ 16.5±4.7 mmol/L <abbrev xlink:title="base excess">BE</abbrev> ≈−7.5±5.0 SatO<sub>2</sub>≤90% (room air)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Acute alveolar or parenchymal failure (e.g., pneumonia, atelectasis)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Nasal / oronasal mask</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Infants and young children (&lt;3 years)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Neonates: short double nasal prongs or nasal mask 4–12 years: oral-nasal mask or helmet &gt;12 years: oral-nasal or full-face mask</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"><bold>Type 2 (hypercapnic)</bold> (n=6; 24%)  (pO<sub>2</sub>&lt;60 mmHg, pCO<sub>2</sub>&gt;45 mmHg)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">pH ≈ 7.32±0.08 pCO₂ ≈ 66.6±20.1 mmHg HCO₃– ≈ 33.5±7.1 mmol/L <abbrev xlink:title="base excess">BE</abbrev> ≈ +8.1±6.3 SatO<sub>2</sub>≤90% (room air)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Chronic ventilatory failure (neuromuscular weakness, obesity, CNS depression *)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Full-face /oronasal mask
</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Older children (&gt;6 years)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"><bold>Neonates</bold>: short double nasal prongs Infants (FiO<sub>2</sub> &lt;0.5): nasal mask/prongs Infants (FiO<sub>2</sub> &gt;0.5): large nasal mask as oral-nasal &gt;6 years: oral-nasal mask; if FiO<sub>2</sub> &gt;0.5, full-face mask</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"><bold>Normal or mixed patterns</bold> (n=17; 68%)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Variable or compensated acid-base balance</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Transitional or partial ventilatory insufficiency</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Mixed interfaces according to tolerance</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">All ages</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Individualized choice based on comfort, facial fit, and disease evolution</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
        <table-wrap-foot>
          <fn>
            <p>* CNS depression- denotes mild or moderate impairment of central respiratory drive that does not compromise airway protection and therefore does not preclude the use of <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev>.</p>
          </fn>
        </table-wrap-foot>
      </table-wrap>
      <table-wrap id="T4" position="float" orientation="portrait">
        <label>Table 4.</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Analysis of changes in base-acid balance on <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev></p>
        </caption>
        <table>
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Parameter</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Before <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> (Mean ± SD)</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>After <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> (Mean ± SD)</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="2">
                <bold>Direction of change</bold>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">pH</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">7.35±0.11</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">7.40±0.09</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">↑</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Normalization</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">pCO<sub>2</sub> (mmHg)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">60.47±29.74</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">45.51±19.51</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">↓</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Significant decrease</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">pO<sub>2</sub> (mmHg)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">82.54±35.83</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">92.66±34.31</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">↑</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Improved oxygenation</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">HCO₃- (mmol/L)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">29.59±9.39</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">27.21±6.13</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">↓</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Slight decline (re-equilibration)</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Base Excess (<abbrev xlink:title="base excess">BE</abbrev>)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">4.16±9.52</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">2.81±5.91</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">↓</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Partial correction</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">SatO<sub>2</sub> (%)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">87.64±9.54</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">93.65±5.48</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">↑</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Improved saturation</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <p>Following initiation of <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev>, patients exhibited a notable improvement in acid–base parameters, reflecting effective correction of ventilatory and gas exchange abnormalities. The improvement in pCO<sub>2</sub> and pH was based on capillary BGA. Oxygenation parameters (pO<sub>2</sub> and SatO<sub>2</sub>) are reported from a combination of capillary BGA and continuous pulse oximetry, with arterial BGA used in cases of severe hypoxemia. The mean pH increased from 7.35±0.11 before therapy to 7.43±0.08 after therapy, indicating a significant shift towards normal acid-base status (<italic>p</italic>&lt;0.05). The reduction of pCO<sub>2</sub> was statistically significant (<italic>p</italic>&lt;0.01), with the mean pCO<sub>2</sub> decreased from 60.5±29.7 mmHg pre-therapy to 44.8±9.5 mmHg post-therapy. This change demonstrates the efficacy of <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> in correcting respiratory acidosis through improved alveolar ventilation and CO<sub>2</sub> clearance. The mean pO₂ increased from 82.5±35.8 mmHg to 98.4±28.6 mmHg, reflecting improved oxygenation efficiency (<italic>p</italic>&lt;0.05). Post-therapy HCO<sub>3</sub>- levels showed a slight decrease (from 33.1±5.7 mmol/L to 30.4±4.9 mmol/L), while <abbrev xlink:title="base excess">BE</abbrev> normalized toward zero (from +6.8±4.2 to +3.1±2.8). These changes are consistent with partial reversal of metabolic compensation following correction of hypercapnia. Peripheral oxygen saturation (SatO<sub>2</sub>) improved modestly, from a mean of 87.64±9.54% to 93.65±5.48, though differences were not statistically significant (<italic>p</italic>&gt;0.05) due to already near-optimal baseline values and oxygen supplementation. The cohort’s mean pre-<abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> pO<sub>2</sub> (82.5±35.8 mmHg) reflects the mix of respiratory failure types. A significant proportion of patients (68%) had hypercapnic or mixed failure, where the primary indication for <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> was elevated pCO<sub>2</sub> (&gt;50 mmHg) and respiratory acidosis, not profound hypoxemia. In these patients, pO<sub>2</sub> was often preserved or only mildly reduced due to supplemental oxygen. The inclusion criterion of hypoxemia (SatO<sub>2</sub>&lt;90% or pO<sub>2</sub>&lt;60 mmHg) was met in all patients, primarily through peripheral oxygen saturation (SatO<sub>2</sub>) below 90% on room air at presentation, which rapidly improved with oxygen supplementation prior to the first BGA. This explains the pO<sub>2</sub> values &gt;60 mmHg in the initial blood gas analysis for some.</p>
      <p>The most frequently used mode of ventilation in this study was Pressure Support Ventilation (<abbrev xlink:title="pressure support ventilation">PSV</abbrev>) (n=12, 48%). This mode was preferred in children with neuromuscular weakness, genetic syndromes with muscle hypotonia, and mild–moderate respiratory distress. Pressure-Controlled Synchronized Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation (<abbrev xlink:title="Pressure-Controlled Synchronized Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation">PC-SIMV</abbrev>) was the second most used mode of ventilation (n=6, 24%) and was indicated in moderate-to-severe respiratory failure, weak spontaneous breathing, and pneumonia with muscle fatigue. Continuous positive airway pressure mode (<abbrev xlink:title="continuous positive airway pressure">CPAP</abbrev>) was used only in three of the patients with primary pulmonary disorder. Mixed modes of ventilation were used in two cases of pneumonia in children with cerebral palsy (P-SIMV/<abbrev xlink:title="pressure support ventilation">PSV</abbrev>) and myasthenia gravis (<abbrev xlink:title="continuous positive airway pressure">CPAP</abbrev>/<abbrev xlink:title="pressure support ventilation">PSV</abbrev>). Only one patient with extreme hypoxemia and a primary diagnosis of cystic fibrosis required a mode of pressure-controlled assist ventilation (P-A/C), followed by intubation and <abbrev xlink:title="invasive mechanical ventilation">IMV</abbrev>.</p>
      <p>On admission radiological findings revealed bilateral pneumonic infiltrates in 32% of children and localized parenchymal consolidation (unilateral pneumonia, atelectasis, or hypoventilated areas) in 28%. Only a minority of patients had normal chest X-rays, and very few showed chronic structural changes <bold>(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref>)</bold>.</p>
      <fig id="F2">
        <object-id content-type="arpha">7BEEAB78-849A-5DFC-BB67-4F3E019B62C9</object-id>
        <label>Figure 2.</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Distribution of chest X-ray findings on admission.</p>
        </caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="foliamedica-68-4-e183527-g002.jpg" id="oo_1761356.jpg">
          <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1761356</uri>
        </graphic>
      </fig>
      <p>Primary respiratory disorders were associated with the highest proportion of patients with elevated inflammatory markers; over 50% in this group had elevations in both C-reactive protein (<abbrev xlink:title="C-reactive protein">CRP</abbrev>) and procalcitonin (<abbrev xlink:title="procalcitonin">PCT</abbrev>). Genetic syndromes also demonstrated a substantial inflammatory component (≈ 2/3 with elevated <abbrev xlink:title="C-reactive protein">CRP</abbrev> and 1/3 with elevated <abbrev xlink:title="procalcitonin">PCT</abbrev>). In contrast, neuromuscular disorders showed low inflammatory activation (only ~17% with <abbrev xlink:title="C-reactive protein">CRP</abbrev> &gt;5 mg/L and none with elevated <abbrev xlink:title="procalcitonin">PCT</abbrev>), consistent with a pathophysiology of chronic ventilatory failure rather than primary infectious pathology <bold>(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref>)</bold>.</p>
      <fig id="F3">
        <object-id content-type="arpha">ED55791D-F1FB-5495-B224-72E3BABC132D</object-id>
        <label>Figure 3.</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Distribution of inflammation markers according to primary diagnosis of patients.</p>
        </caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="foliamedica-68-4-e183527-g003.jpg" id="oo_1761357.jpg">
          <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1761357</uri>
        </graphic>
      </fig>
      <p>The SatO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> ratio (S/F) was used to assess the severity of acute respiratory distress and grade hypoxemia. In most of the cases, <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> was initiated for patients with an S/F ratio of over 250 (mild hypoxemia), while nine patients had moderate hypoxemia (S/F ratio between 150 and 250). Only seven patients (28%) presented with severe hypoxemia on admission (S/F&lt;150). In comparing pre-therapy hypoxemia severity with clinical outcome, cases with mild-to-moderate hypoxemia showed a favorable response to <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev>. Patients who required transfer to IV or long-term <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> had intermediate S/F ratios (150–220), indicating moderate hypoxemia and partial ventilatory compromise. All children with severe hypoxemic states required intubation due to failure of <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> or died <bold>(Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">5</xref>)</bold>.</p>
      <table-wrap id="T5" position="float" orientation="portrait">
        <label>Table 5.</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Distribution of patients according to S/F ratio before initiation of treatment and clinical outcome of therapy</p>
        </caption>
        <table>
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>S/F Ratio Category  (before <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev>)</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Interpretation of oxygenation</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>No. of patients  (n=25)</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>% of group 2</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Predominant clinical outcome</bold>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">&gt;250</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Mild or no hypoxemia</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">9</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">36%</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Recovered – successful <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev>, full weaning</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">150 – 250</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Moderate hypoxemia</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">9</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">36%</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Improved / Transferred – stable or discharged with home <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev></td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">&lt;150</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Severe hypoxemia</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">7</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">28%</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"><abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> failure or death</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <p>The duration of non-invasive ventilatory support was longest among patients with neuromuscular disorders (n=6), with a mean of 48.2±94.2 days (median 12.5). One patient with cerebral palsy required <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> for 30.0 days. In contrast, children with primary pulmonary diseases (n=1) had considerably shorter <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> courses, averaging 6.4±5.8 days (median 6), as did those with genetic syndromes (n=3), who required 6.3±3.5 days (median 6) <bold>(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4</xref>)</bold>. The Kruskal–Wallis test found no statistically significant difference in <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> duration across all diagnostic groups (<italic>p</italic>=0.133), most likely due to the small sample size and high variability within the neuromuscular cohort. However, pairwise comparison revealed that patients with neuromuscular disorders required significantly longer <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> support than those with primary pulmonary or genetic conditions, reflecting the chronic nature of ventilatory insufficiency in neuromuscular disease.</p>
      <fig id="F4">
        <object-id content-type="arpha">F6B8B66A-81B0-5394-98CF-23CE56B086EC</object-id>
        <label>Figure 4.</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Distribution of mean duration of <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> therapy and diagnose of patients.</p>
        </caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="foliamedica-68-4-e183527-g004.jpg" id="oo_1761358.jpg">
          <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1761358</uri>
        </graphic>
      </fig>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Discussion" id="sec7">
      <title>Discussion</title>
      <p>This study aimed to describe our experience in using non-invasive ventilation (<abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev>) as a first-line therapy in children with respiratory failure admitted to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit. <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> is now widely applied in pediatric practice, with reported success rates between 55% and 96%, although outcomes depend strongly on disease-specific and patient-related factors.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>]</sup> In our cohort, the predominant causes of respiratory failure were neuromuscular diseases (<abbrev xlink:title="neuromuscular diseases">NMD</abbrev>), characterized by respiratory muscle weakness and ineffective airway clearance. In these patients, respiratory infections frequently precipitate acute respiratory failure or exacerbate chronic respiratory insufficiency. <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> has been shown to improve both nocturnal and daytime gas exchange, enhance sleep efficiency, and prolong survival in this population.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>]</sup> The most common diagnosis in our study was type 1 spinal muscular atrophy, the most severe form associated with profound hypotonia and chronic respiratory failure, requiring long-term home ventilation. Consistent with previous studies, <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> use in children with <abbrev xlink:title="spinal muscular atrophy">SMA</abbrev> and Duchenne muscular dystrophy has been associated with improved quality of life and reduced mortality.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>]</sup> Respiratory infections represented the second most frequent indication for <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> in our series. <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> was successfully applied in cases of acute respiratory failure due to primary pulmonary disease, although severe hypoxemia remains a contraindication for its initiation.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>]</sup></p>
      <p>An <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> interface is a device that connects the patient to the ventilator tubing. Successful <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> requires a compatible interface and securing system. One of the most common causes of <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> failure within the first few hours of treatment is patient discomfort with the interface or a lack of patient–ventilator synchrony.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>]</sup> The choice of interface depends on the patient’s age and type of respiratory failure. Most studies recommend nasal masks as a first choice for children starting <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev>.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>]</sup> In <bold>Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref></bold>, we compare our results with the current recommendations for the choice of <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> interface. Nasal masks are generally indicated for type II chronic respiratory failure or type I acute respiratory failure, but only for patients that are not severely dyspneic and can cooperate and keep their mouths closed; otherwise, air leakage would make the mask intolerable. Oronasal masks are best suited for type I and advanced type II acute respiratory failure, in which the patient cannot breathe through the nose alone, especially for dyspneic patients who tend to breathe through the mouth. In our study, oronasal and full-face masks were preferred for older children with hypercapnic respiratory failure, whereas nasal masks or prongs were used for infants.</p>
      <p>Dual-pressure modes with continuous flow seem to be the best tolerated <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> modes. There have been very few comparative studies on the efficacy and tolerance of <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> modes, most of which have been conducted in adults.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>]</sup> The <abbrev xlink:title="pressure support ventilation">PSV</abbrev> combines controlled, assisted, and spontaneous breaths, requiring the coexistence of different inspiratory and expiratory triggering mechanisms.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>]</sup><abbrev xlink:title="pressure support ventilation">PSV</abbrev> was the most common mode in patients with neuromuscular disease, chosen for the safety of its back-up mode in case of apnea and for better patient-ventilator synchrony. Studies suggest <abbrev xlink:title="pressure support ventilation">PSV</abbrev> is the most appropriate mode for long-term home ventilation in children with <abbrev xlink:title="spinal muscular atrophy">SMA</abbrev>.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>]</sup><abbrev xlink:title="continuous positive airway pressure">CPAP</abbrev> is generally preferred for primary hypoxemic, type 1 failure due to upper or lower airway obstruction. This mode delivers constant pressure to maintain airway patency.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>]</sup> These findings align with our cohort, in which bilevel modes (<abbrev xlink:title="pressure support ventilation">PSV</abbrev> and <abbrev xlink:title="Pressure-Controlled Synchronized Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation">PC-SIMV</abbrev>) were favored in neuromuscular and chronic ventilatory disorders, whereas <abbrev xlink:title="continuous positive airway pressure">CPAP</abbrev> was mainly used in hypoxemic conditions.</p>
      <p>Although arterial blood gas (<abbrev xlink:title="arterial blood gas">ABG</abbrev>) analysis remains the gold standard for evaluating gas exchange, arterial puncture is an invasive and technically demanding procedure, associated with discomfort and potential complications in approximately 11.3% of cases.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">19</xref>]</sup> In pediatric practice, arterialized capillary blood sampling is therefore routinely employed as a reliable and less invasive alternative. In this study, <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> led to a rapid and statistically significant correction of respiratory acidosis, with normalization of pH and reduction in pCO<sub>2</sub>. These findings confirm the efficiency of <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> in improving ventilation and CO<sub>2</sub> clearance while also enhancing oxygenation without invasive mechanical ventilation.</p>
      <p>The radiological and inflammatory patterns in our cohort reflected two distinct mechanisms of respiratory failure. Children with primary respiratory disease, genetic syndromes, or systemic comorbidities showed the highest inflammatory burden and the highest frequency of pneumonic infiltrates, indicating that <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> was often initiated in the setting of acute infection. In contrast, children with neuromuscular disorders had minimal inflammatory elevation and radiographs consistent with chronic or non-infectious changes—such as atelectasis or hypoventilation—supporting the notion that <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> in this group was primarily used for chronic ventilatory pump failure rather than inflammatory lung disease. Although statistical significance was not reached for individual markers, the combined radiographic and laboratory findings clearly distinguish infection-related respiratory failure from chronic neuromuscular insufficiency.</p>
      <p>Similar to other studies that have shown that hypoxemia or the presence of acute respiratory distress syndrome predicts <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> failure, our study identified that FiO<sub>2</sub> at initiation as a marker for failure.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>]</sup> The severity of hypoxemia is a key predictor of failure.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>]</sup> The oxygenation index, estimated by the ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure to the fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> or P/F ratio), is a standard measure. The ratio of pulse oximetric saturation to the fraction of inspired oxygen (SpO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> or S/F) is a less invasive method of assessing hypoxemia severity, with effectiveness comparable to the P/F ratio. The SpO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> ratio before <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> initiation was a powerful predictor of outcome. In our study, patients with baseline S/F ratio &gt;200–250 showed high likelihood of recovery, while those below 150 frequently experienced <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> failure or mortality. Thus, the S/F ratio is an accessible and reliable index for early stratification of patients’ prognosis during non-invasive ventilatory therapy.</p>
      <p>The mean duration of <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> in patients with primary pulmonary diseases, respiratory failure in genetic syndromes, or other causes—cancer, metabolic diseases, etc.—was 6.3 days, which is similar to the results of a study by Ferdous et al.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">25</xref>]</sup> Neurological disorders are a major indication for long-term mechanical ventilation (<abbrev xlink:title="long-term mechanical ventilation">LTMV</abbrev>), as chronic respiratory failure frequently develops from progressive muscle weakness. Previous studies report that 20–56% of children with neuromuscular disease require <abbrev xlink:title="long-term mechanical ventilation">LTMV</abbrev>.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">26</xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">28</xref>]</sup> In our cohort, children with neuromuscular disorders and cerebral palsy demonstrated the longest duration of <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> therapy, reflecting the severity of their ventilatory compromise. All patients with spinal muscular atrophy required continuation of <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> at home, consistent with evidence that <abbrev xlink:title="Non-invasive ventilation">NIV</abbrev> improves tidal ventilation, unloads respiratory muscles, and enhances gas exchange in chronic neuromuscular conditions.<sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">29</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">30</xref>]</sup></p>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Conclusions" id="sec8">
      <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>Non-invasive ventilation can be an effective respiratory support in both acute and chronic respiratory failure when applied with appropriate clinical judgment. Careful attention to patient selection, interface choice, and timing of initiation is essential to optimize outcomes. Continuous close monitoring of clinical signs, gas exchange, and oxygenation indices such as the S/F ratio plays a critical role in guiding therapy and predicting success.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Limitations" id="sec9">
      <title>Limitations</title>
      <p>This study has several limitations. First, the sample size was relatively small, which limited the statistical power of the findings. Second, the study was conducted in a single center, and the results reflected local clinical practice patterns. Larger, multicenter studies are needed to validate these observations and strengthen the conclusions.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="B1">
        <label>1.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Sequera-Ramos L, Garcia-Marcinkiewicz A, Riva T, et al. Noninvasive ventilation in children: A review for the pediatric anesthesiologist. Paediatr Anaesth 2022; 32(2):262–72. <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.1111/pan.14364">doi: 10.1111/pan.14364</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B2">
        <label>2.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Emeriaud G, Napolitano N, Polikoff L, et al. Impact of failure of noninvasive ventilation on the safety of pediatric tracheal intubation. Crit Care Med 2020; 48(10):1503–12.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B3">
        <label>3.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Amaddeo A, Frapin A, Fauroux B. Long-term non-invasive ventilation in children. Lancet Respir Med 2016; 4(12):999–1008. <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.1016/S2213-2600(16)30151-5">doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(16)30151-5</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B4">
        <label>4.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Medina Villanueva A, Pons M, Martinón-Torres F, et al. Non-invasive ventilation in pediatrics. 2nd ed. Madrid: Ergon; 2009. Chapter 7, Non-invasive ventilation in pediatrics; p. 47–58.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B5">
        <label>5.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Demaret P, Mulder A, Loeckx I, et al. Noninvasive ventilation is useful in pediatric intensive care units if children are appropriately selected and carefully monitored. Acta Paediatr 2015; 104(09):861–71.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B6">
        <label>6.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Marcus CL, Brooks LJ, Draper KA, et al. American Academy of Pediatrics. Diagnosis and management of childhood obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Pediatrics 2012; 130(3):e714–55. <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.1542/peds.2012-1672">doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-1672</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B7">
        <label>7.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Waters KA, Everett FM, Bruderer JW, et al Obstructive sleep apnea: the use of nasal CPAP in 80 children. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995; 152(2):780–5. <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.1164/ajrccm.152.2.7633742">doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.152.2.7633742</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B8">
        <label>8.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Leboulanger N, Picard A, Soupre V, et al. Physiologic and clinical benefits of noninvasive ventilation in infants with Pierre Robin sequence. Pediatrics 2010; 126(5):e1056–63. <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.1542/peds.2010-0856">doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-0856</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B9">
        <label>9.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Concha A, Medina A, Pons M, et al. Non-invasive ventilation interfaces. Noninvasive ventilation in pediatrics. Second Edition. pp. 23-36. ISBN: 978-84-8473-757-5.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B10">
        <label>10.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Kwok H, McCormack J, Cece R, et al. Controlled trial of oronasal versus nasal mask ventilation in the treatment of acute respiratory failure. Crit Care Med 2003; 31:468–73.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B11">
        <label>11.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Hess DR. Noninvasive ventilation in neuromuscular disease: equipment and application. Respir Care 2006; 51:896–911.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B12">
        <label>12.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Masolini M, Castellani C, Innocenti C, et al. Interfaces for non-invasive ventilation in children. ERJ Open Research 2020; 6(Suppl. 4):48.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B13">
        <label>13.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Lawang SA, Jayaganda I, Indrawati GD, et al. Correlation of arterial and venous blood gas analysis in respiratory failure in children. Intensive Care Med Paediatr Neonatal 2024; 2:23. <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.1007/s44253-024-00046-1">doi: 10.1007/s44253-024-00046-1</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B14">
        <label>14.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Peter JV, Moran JL, Phillips-Hughes J, et al. Noninvasive ventilation in acute respiratory failure–a meta-analysis update. Crit Care Med 2002; 30(03):555–62.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B15">
        <label>15.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Bernet V, Hug MI, Frey B. Predictive factors for the success of noninvasive mask ventilation in infants and children with acute respiratory failure. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2005; 6(06):660–4.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B16">
        <label>16.</label>
        <mixed-citation>López-Herce J, Pilar J. Non-invasive ventilation modes and methods for pediatric patients. Noninvasive ventilation in pediatrics. Second Edition. pp. 47-57. ISBN: 978-84-8473-757-5.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B17">
        <label>17.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Arnal J-M, Khirani S. Cycling the breath in noninvasive home ventilation. J Clin Med 2024; 13:6673. <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.3390/jcm13226673">doi: 10.3390/jcm13226673</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B18">
        <label>18.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Khirani S, Stehling F, Dudoignon B, et al. Trigger issues with a life support device in children. Sleep Medicine 2025; 131:106534. <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.1016/j.sleep.2025.106534">doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2025.106534</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B19">
        <label>19.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Haut C. Pediatric Noninvasive Ventilation. J Pediatr Intensive Care 2015; 4(2):121–7. <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.1055/s-0035-1556754">doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1556754</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B20">
        <label>20.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Joshi G, Tobias JD. A five-year experience with the use of BiPAP in a pediatric intensive care unit population. J Intensive Care Med 2007; 22(01):38–43.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B21">
        <label>21.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference Group. Pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome: consensus recommendations from the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2015; 16(05):428–39.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B22">
        <label>22.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Ganu SS, Gautam A, Wilkins B, et al. Increase in use of noninvasive ventilation for infants with severe bronchiolitis is associated with decline in intubation rates over a decade. Intensive Care Med 2012; 38(7):1177–83.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B23">
        <label>23.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Lazner MR, Basu AP, Klonin H. Non-invasive ventilation for severe bronchiolitis: analysis and evidence. Pediatr Pulmonol 2012; 47(9):909–16.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B24">
        <label>24.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Abadesso C, Nunes P, Silvestre C, et al. Non-invasive ventilation in acute respiratory failure in children. Pediatric Reports 2012; 4(2):e16. <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.4081/pr.2012.e16">doi: 10.4081/pr.2012.e16</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B25">
        <label>25.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Khemani RG, Patel NR, Bart RD III, et al. Comparison of the pulse oximetric saturation/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio and the PaO<sub>2</sub>/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio in children. Chest 2009; 135(03):662–8.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B26">
        <label>26.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Ferdous A, Afrin M, Hossain MM. The efficacy of NIV in pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) with respiratory failure admitted patients. ARC Journal of Pediatrics 2021; 7(1):1–5. doi: 10.2043 1/24555711.0701001</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B27">
        <label>27.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Basa M, Minic P, Rodic M, et al. Evolution of pediatric home mechanical ventilation program in Serbia - what has changed in the last decade. Front Pediatr 2020; 8:261. <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.3389/fped.2020.00261">doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.00261</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B28">
        <label>28.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Fauroux B, Simões EAF, Checchia PA, et al. The burden and long-term respiratory morbidity associated with respiratory syncytial virus infection in early childhood. Infect Dis Ther 2017; 6(2):173–97. <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.1007/s40121-017-0151-4">doi: 10.1007/s40121-017-0151-4</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B29">
        <label>29.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Pavone M, Verrillo E, Onofri A, et al. Characteristics and outcomes in children on long-term mechanical ventilation: the experience of a pediatric tertiary center in Rome. Ital J Pediatr 2020; 46(1):12. <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.1186/s13052-020-0778-8">doi: 10.1186/s13052-020-0778-8</ext-link>; <ext-link ext-link-type="pmid" xlink:href="32005269">PMID: 32005269</ext-link>; PMCID: <ext-link ext-link-type="pmcid" xlink:href="PMC6995086">PMC6995086</ext-link>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B30">
        <label>30.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Rossi A, Appendini L, Roca J. Physiological aspects of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation. Eur Respir Mon 2001; 6:1–10.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
    <sec sec-type="Additional information" id="sec10">
      <title>Additional information</title>
      <p>
        <bold>Ethical statement</bold>
      </p>
      <list list-type="bullet">
        <list-item>
          <p>The authors declared that no clinical trials were used in the present study.
</p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>The authors declared that no experiments on humans or human tissues were performed for the present study.
</p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>The authors declared that written informed consent was obtained from the parents or legal guardians of all minor patients for the publication of this study and any accompanying images. The signed informed consent forms are safely deposited at the Professor Ivan Mitev University Pediatric Hospital of Active Treatment, Sofia, Bulgaria and available for review upon request.
</p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>The authors declared that no experiments on animals were performed for the present study.
</p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>The authors declared that no commercially available immortalized human and animal cell lines were used in the present study.
</p>
        </list-item>
      </list>
      <p>
        <bold>Conflict of interest</bold>
      </p>
      <p>The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.</p>
      <p>
        <bold>Artificial Intelligence (AI) use</bold>
      </p>
      <p>The authors accept full responsibility for the content of the manuscript, including the disclosure of any use of AI. During the preparation of this work, the authors used an AI agent for grammar checking and language style editing.</p>
      <p>
        <bold>Funding</bold>
      </p>
      <p>No funding was reported.</p>
      <p>
        <bold>Author contributions</bold>
      </p>
      <p>LB conceptualized the manuscript, drafted it, served as the study’s attending physician, and conducted preliminary statistics. LI, TT, and BB contributed ideas for the manuscript, assisted with manuscript revisions, and served as the study patients’ attending physicians. GP conceptualized the manuscript, oversaw its completion, and performed the final statistics and revision.</p>
      <p>
        <bold>Author ORCIDs</bold>
      </p>
      <p>Lilia Bozadzhieva <ext-link xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9573-0838" ext-link-type="uri">https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9573-0838</ext-link></p>
      <p>Lyubomila Ilarionova <ext-link xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6145-0157" ext-link-type="uri">https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6145-0157</ext-link></p>
      <p>Blagomir Zdravkov <ext-link xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0644-8748" ext-link-type="uri">https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0644-8748</ext-link></p>
      <p>Guergana Petrova <ext-link xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8168-742X" ext-link-type="uri">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8168-742X</ext-link></p>
      <p>
        <bold>Data availability</bold>
      </p>
      <p>All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.</p>
    </sec>
  </back>
</article>
