Review |
Corresponding author: Lyudmila Vladimirova-Kitova ( kitov@vip.bg ) © 2024 Spas Kitov, Lyudmila Vladimirova-Kitova.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Kitov S, Vladimirova-Kitova L (2024) A review of alternative measurements in strain imaging for ventricular arrhythmia prediction. Folia Medica 66(5): 599-607. https://doi.org/10.3897/folmed.66.e128267
|
Global longitudinal strain has been established as a reliable tool to assess global left ventricular function and a marker of subclinical left ventricular dysfunction unrecognized by the ejection fraction. On the other hand, ventricular arrhythmias are the most common cause of sudden cardiac death. Their early detection is a challenge. Possible prognostic markers for the risk of ventricular arrhythmias are discussed in the literature – electrocardiographic, cardiac magnetic resonance, computed tomography, radionuclide imaging, and markers from new echocardiographic techniques. Of the latter, at this stage of knowledge, several markers have been discussed as informative for predicting ventricular arrhythmias – global longitudinal strain, radial strain and mechanical dispersion, and most recently, myocardial work. As far as we are informed, global longitudinal strain is particularly useful in patients with normal echocardiographic parameters such as left ventricular ejection fraction, left atrial diameter, left ventricular wall thickness, and aortic root. The relationship between mechanical dispersion and ventricular arrhythmias has been widely studied. The relationship has been studied more in some patient populations – heart failure, ischemic heart disease, long QT syndrome and arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy, congenital heart disease. The role of mechanical dispersion as a predictor of ventricular arrhythmias in metabolic syndrome is scarce.
ejection fraction, global longitudinal strain, mechanical dispersion, myocardial work, radial strain
Cardiac arrests in the emergency rooms are usually caused by disturbances in the heart rhythm such as ventricular fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia. The underlying mechanisms are multifactorial in nature. Heterogenous ventricular activation is most often due to cardiac fibrosis, an aftermath of tissue damage.
Echocardiography plays an important role in the evaluation of the structural substrate for arrhythmogenesis. The benefits are that it is noninvasive, easily accessible, and portable. Most often this is done by measuring the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). For more than 60 years, LVEF has been a primary tool for assessing systolic function. Its limitations associated with volume-only assessment have been documented over time due to technical constraints, such as poor repeatability, geometric variation, and load dependence.[
Speckle-tracking echocardiography has several advantages for assessing myocardial function. It enables a thorough assessment of cardiac mechanics since strain measurement is extremely sensitive in detecting systolic dysfunction that the ejection fraction cannot detect.[
On the other hand, early identification of patients at risk for ventricular arrhythmias is difficult in clinical practice, particularly in patients with LVEF >35%, despite the fact that ventricular arrhythmias are the most common cause of sudden cardiac death.[
On the one hand, ventricular arrhythmias might develop as a result of channelopathies, toxicity, or other unknown reasons. On the other hand, in practice, structural heart disease is a quite common cause of ventricular arrhythmias. Echocardiography is applied in the evaluation of structural and functional cardiac problems and, in recent years, to detect patients at high risk of ventricular arrhythmia. Mechanical contraction of the heart is an end product of electrical conduction in the heart and cardiomyocyte depolarization (excitation-contraction coupling).[
Initially, strain imaging was used as a function of tissue Doppler imaging.[
Data in the literature in recent years demonstrate that GLS can detect left ventricular systolic dysfunction at an earlier stage than the ejection fraction.[
Fig.
Examples of the longitudinal strain bull’s eye plot in a patient with arterial hypertension, a 55-year-old male; metabolic syndrome; basal septal wall thickness is 14 mm, left ventricular posterior wall end diastole is 9 mm, and LVEF is 62%.
At this stage of knowledge, GLS is particularly suitable for patients with normal echocardiographic parameters such as left ventricular ejection fraction, left atrial diameter, left ventricular wall thickness, and aortic root.
Data from the literature demonstrate that GLS is prognostic in relation to cardiovascular events, in contrast to ejection fraction and Killip class.[
At this stage, ventricular arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death risk stratification at an ejection fraction below 35% is considered suboptimal. But at present, it is relied mainly on this fact.[
In a prospective study, Ersbøll et al. state that GLS leads to the determination of the risk of ventricular arrhythmias in myocardial infarction acute phase of up to 48 hours. Both GLS and MD were significantly and independently related to sudden cardiac death/ventricular arrhythmias in these patients with acute myocardial infarction. In this study GLS improved risk stratification above and beyond existing risk factors. GLS was significantly reduced in patients who presented with ventricular arrhythmias compared to patients who did not.[
According to data from Haugaa et al., in patients with a prolonged QT interval it was observed that left ventricular mechanical dispersion measured by tissue Doppler imaging was superior to the corrected QT interval.[
A study by the same team Haugaa et al. in patients after myocardial infarction and ICD, only the combination of MD and GLS can select with greater precision suitable patients for ICD therapy, especially those with an ejection fraction of >35%. The study has multiple limitations of a technical nature.[
In patients with a corrected tetralogy of Fallot, Van Grootel et al. discovered that left ventricular as well as right ventricular longitudinal strain add additional information to the routine prognostic risk evaluation of sudden cardiac death and the development of heart failure.[
In ischemic heart disease, the role of GLS as a ventricular arrhythmia prognostic marker is controversial. A meta-analysis found that GLS was not associated with ventricular arrhythmias.[
Data from a large study such as MADIT-CRT provides strong evidence unlike meta-analyses. In myocardial infarction, there is other data that GLS predicts ventricular arrhythmias, but in a retrospective analysis or in a composite outcome with heart failure or mortality. In a substudy of MADIT-CRT with continuous rhythm monitoring and assessment of ventricular arrhythmias[
Data from the beginning of 2024 shows that GLS is a useful indicator in finding suitable patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy who are implantable cardioverter defibrillator candidates, confirming the strong link between GLS and fatal arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death.[
Mechanical dyssynchrony represents the inhomogeneity of myocardial contraction within the boundaries of the left ventricle. For several decades, mechanical dyssynchrony has been applied in ventricular arrhythmia prediction in specific patient groups and to identify those suitable for resynchronization therapy. In medical practice, mechanical dispersion is the most commonly used measure of dyssynchrony.[
Generally, in a 16-segment model, MD is defined as the standard deviation of peak longitudinal strain time. MD has excellent reproducibility (intra–and interobserver –0.95 and 0.94).[
Rodríguez-Zenella et al. are the only ones that set themselves the task of determining reference values in healthy people. They studied 334 healthy volunteers (Caucasian race, mean age 54 years, 54% female). They found a total normal value of 34±10 ms with an upper limit of 56 ms. No difference in MD was found between men and women, but it increased with age. The authors found that age, GLS, and E/e’ were independently correlated to MD.[
Aagaard et al. studied not only healthy individuals but included 2529 participants. They found that ischemic heart disease, hypertension, GLS, e’ and left ventricular ejection fraction correlated with higher MD.[
The association between MD and ventricular arrhythmias has been widely studied, similarly to GLS. Some patient populations have been studied more thoroughly – those with heart failure[
Kawakami et al. made an ischemic cardiomyopathy meta-analysis, including 12 studies with a total of 3198 patients during 17 to 70 months of follow-up. The analysis showed higher MD in patients with ventricular arrhythmias and independently associated with them, and that MD was better than left ventricular ejection fraction and GLS for prediction of ventricular arrhythmias. A limiting factor is the heterogeneity of the included studies. However, Kawakami et al. discovered that a 1-SD change in LVMD was a stronger predictor of VA events compared with the same changes in LVEF and GLS. The patients with VA events had significantly greater mechanical dispersion compared with those without VA events, with 60 ms being an acceptable cutoff LVMD value for predicting VA events. An interesting claim made by Kawakami et al. is that MD in CRT patients cannot predict ventricular arrhythmias because CRT influences arrhythmia risk and regional timing.[
Unlike previous data, Harapoz et al. presented the possibilities of MD in 346 patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy in a meta-analysis, finding no significant association between MD and ventricular arrhythmias. A limiting factor is the small number of subjects included. What remains an open question is whether MD is an important ventricular arrhythmia predictor in non-ischemic cardiomyopathy as opposed to ischemic cardiomyopathy, in which pathophysiological mechanisms lead to the spread of fibrosis in the myocardium.[
In the MADIT-CRT study of 1064 patients with continuous rhythm monitoring, Biering-Sørensen et al. found that for a mean of 2.9 years, those who had ventricular arrhythmias had similar MD to those without ventricular arrhythmias.[
Kutyifa et al. claim in their analysis that baseline MD does not predict ventricular arrhythmias. However, patients with left-bundle branch block CRT who improved their MD after 12 months had a lower risk of ventricular arrhythmias.[
In the MeDiPace transcatheter aortic valve implantation study, MD was considerably higher in patients who required a pacemaker following transcatheter aortic valve implantation compared with patients without a pacemaker. Additionally, MD and right-bundle branch block were independent predictors of pacemaker implantation following transcatheter aortic valve implantation. MD improves prognosis when combined with right-bundle branch block. These results suggest that PM implantation in patients with normal MD should be avoided.[
In a 2020 study in the middle-aged general population, the predominant coronary heart disease and hypertension were linked to increased mechanical variance, which probably indicates an increased fatal arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death risk. Although less severe, systolic and diastolic dysfunction are also linked to increased mechanical dispersion.[
There is scarce data in the literature on MD in patients with metabolic syndrome, which covers a huge cohort of patients in clinical practice, with the scope of a pandemic.[
GLS demonstrates the global LV deformation, the assessment of the tissue deformation in certain areas of the left ventricle is done by regional strain. Through the gold standard examination of the myocardium, it is established that longitudinal and radial deformation are progressively impaired by non-, peri- and infarct zones.[
In the VALIANT study, regional strain was found to be impaired in areas that were assessed as normokinetic. On the other hand, a greater number of segments with impaired regional strain is associated with higher mortality and heart failure.[
Biering-Sørensen et al. reveal a very important clinical fact that reduced regional strain outside the area of the culprit artery demonstrates limited reserve after myocardial infarction.[
In myocardial infarction patients, the presence of fibrous tissue in the myocardial zone is the substrate with arrhythmogenic potential. At the same time, the peri-infarct zone has intermediate non-transmural fibrosis, which leads to electrical dispersion, delayed conduction, and one-way block. The latter produce substrates for ventricular arrhythmias.[
There is scarce data in the literature on the informative value of regional strain in relation to ventricular arrhythmias than GLS and MD. Nguyen et al. studied the potential of regional strain to predict ICD in 424 ischemic cardiomyopathy and a prophylactic implanted cardioverter defibrillator patients. It was found that regional strain in the peri-infarct zone was independently related to the need for an ICD.[
In a 25-month follow-up of 51 patients with documented ventricular arrhythmias or 24-hour Holter monitoring, recording at hospitalization or electrophysiological examination. Data shows that longitudinal and circumferential strain demonstrate high AUCs for detecting ventricular arrhythmias. Furthermore, only abnormal circumferential peri-infarct strain and MD were independently related to ventricular arrhythmias. More massive myocardial infarctions are not limited to subendocardial ischemia, reflected in GLS, but also reduce circumferential strain.[
In heart failure patients, MADIT-CRT is the largest study to investigate the potential of regional longitudinal strain and its role in predicting ventricular arrhythmias.[
Biering-Sørensen et al. studied 1064 patients and found that longitudinal strain in the lower and posterior segments of the left ventricular wall correlated with the occurrence of ventricular tachycardia/flutter.[
Data from the literature verify the gold standard of cardiac MRI to anatomically detect areas of dysfunctional myocardium and predict ventricular arrhythmias and mortality.[
Although GLS, MD, and regional strain are the most widely studied strain indicators in terms of predicting ventricular arrhythmias, theoretically any other indicators of myocardial mechanics may have prognostic value. The latter include indicators of paradoxical movement and myocardial work. However, currently, their associations with ventricular arrhythmias have been poorly studied.
Paradoxical motion is a change in myocardial tissue motion, with left ventricular segments lengthening when they should be shortening. In clinical practice, it most often appears as early systolic lengthening or as postsystolic shortening. Paradoxical motion is most commonly observed in ischemic heart disease and shows ischemic segments with potential tissue viability. Nevertheless, they can also occur in other conditions, including conduction abnormalities and mitral annular disjunction. It should also be mentioned that to some extent, they may occur under regular circumstances as part of normal physiology. These indices of myocardial deformation are highly correlated with ischemia and possibly with the extent of myocardial involvement. It is logical that they are also markers for an increased risk of ventricular arrhythmias. But this claim needs to be proven.[
In a study of 569 patients, Haugaa et al. found that patients who developed ventricular arrhythmias had a higher degree of postsystolic shortening, (postsystolic stress index), compared to patients without ventricular arrhythmias. All patients had a left ventricular ejection fraction >35%. Postsystolic strain index was not an independent predictor of ventricular arrhythmias when MD was included.[
The latest trend in strain development is a new method for assessing myocardial performance with pressure-strain loop analysis. This method, introduced by Russell et al. in 2012, enables assessment of the myocardial performance by combining data on strain, arterial blood pressure, and valvular event time. This method has excellent reproducibility. Inclusion of arterial pressure as an afterload assessment assesses systolic function in more detail.[
Practical approaches to measure myocardial performance are described in detail in the literature. A significant point in the measurement is the information obtained about the constructive work, wasted work and work efficiency. All three are affected by the paradoxicality of motion. And the latter can point us to the risk of ventricular arrhythmias.[
In a meta-analysis, Truong et al. provide echocardiographic reference ranges for noninvasive indices of myocardial work. As reference for clinical and research use these normal values could serve. Echocardiographic reference ranges for indices of myocardial work were established. Gender significantly contributed to variations in normal values of myocardial work. Myocardial work indices had excellent and good intra- and interobserver reproducibility.[
At this stage, it is assumed that myocardial performance provides clinical information superior to GLS. This is what the literature shows. A case report by Jaworski et al. discusses the possible application of regional work in a patient with ventricular fibrillation.[
Currently, there is no data on the relationship between myocardial performance and ventricular arrhythmia risk. This question remains to be clarified in additional clinical studies.
Data on the relationship of strain assessment (GLS and MD) and ventricular arrhythmias in a large spectrum of cardiovascular diseases demonstrate likely clinical utility. At this stage, there is a lack of studies that evaluate whether or not a patient is suitable for an implantable cardioverter defibrillator by randomizing based on strain measurement. The new methods –paradoxical movement and myocardial work are far from being a prognostic factor. Much more research is necessary in this direction, but the need for the clinician to support these methodologies is likely to give impetus to such research.
The authors have no support to report.
The authors have no funding to report.
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.