Case Report |
|
Corresponding author: Prema Anbarasu ( prema.arasu@gmail.com ) © 2026 Prema Anbarasu, Saravana Kumar Subramanian, M. Gokilla Priya, Dhanush Sakthivel, Harini Saravanan, R. Pravin.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Anbarasu P, Subramanian SK, Gokilla Priya M, Sakthivel D, Saravanan H, Pravin R (2026) Customized chin cup: enhancing pediatric compliance in Class III orthodontic treatment – a case report. Folia Medica 68(2): e147880. https://doi.org/10.3897/folmed.68.e147880
|
This case report emphasizes the role of a customized chin cup in the management of Class III malocclusion in pediatric patients, emphasizing its contribution to improved compliance and treatment outcomes. Class III malocclusion, often characterized by maxillary retrusion and mandibular prognathism, presents unique challenges in orthodontics, particularly in young patients. Reverse pull facemask therapy is a well-established method to correct maxillary retrusion, but the success of this approach heavily depends on patient compliance. Prefabricated chin cups, commonly used in facemasks, frequently lead to discomfort and irritation, negatively affecting adherence. In this report, we present a simple, cost-effective technique to customize chin cups using polyvinyl siloxane (PVS) for enhanced comfort, stability, and compliance. By improving the fit of the chin cup, this method addresses a critical barrier to successful Class III treatment in pediatric cases.
class III malocclusion, customized chin cup, facemask, PVS impression
Class III malocclusion is defined by a range of craniofacial anomalies, including mandibular prognathism, maxillary retrusion, or a combination of both.[
Among these interventions, reverse pull facemask therapy, first introduced over a century ago, remains one of the most effective approaches for treating maxillary retrusion. This therapy works by applying forward traction to the maxilla, promoting skeletal changes through circummaxillary suture remodeling, and encouraging favorable occlusal relationships.[
Despite its efficacy, the success of facemask therapy depends largely on patient compliance.[
This report introduces a straightforward technique for customizing chin cups using PVS, a material widely available in orthodontic offices. By addressing comfort-related issues, this technique enhances patient compliance and optimizes the outcomes of Class III malocclusion treatment.
A 10-year-old female patient presented with a skeletal Class III malocclusion characterized by an orthognathic maxilla and prognathic mandible. The patient exhibited a horizontal growth pattern with an anticlockwise rotated mandible. Dental findings are Angle’s Class III malocclusion with proclined and forwardly placed upper and lower incisors, upper anterior crowding, and a lower dental midline shift to the right by 3 mm. Additionally, mesiopalatally rotated 14, distopalatally rotated 15, and ectopically erupted 23 (Figs
The treatment aimed to address the skeletal discrepancies by improving the maxillomandibular relationship. Specific objectives were correcting overjet and overbite, aligning proclined incisors, resolving upper anterior crowding, managing rotated teeth, addressing the dental midline shift, and eliminating anterior spacing. Secondary objectives included enhancing smile esthetics and managing the high frenal attachment.
Treatment commenced with bonded RME to mobilize maxillary sutures and reduce lower anterior facial height while developing the malar area. This was followed by facemask therapy to protract the maxilla and retrude the mandible. Fixed appliance therapy with MBT prescription (0.022” slot) was initiated to achieve leveling, aligning, and en masse retraction of the anterior teeth. Finishing and detailing were planned to establish ideal occlusion and esthetics. Genioplasty was reserved as a possible intervention post-growth completion if needed.
The treatment began with bonded RME to mobilize the maxillary sutures and enhance the effectiveness of facemask therapy. Facemask therapy was subsequently employed to protract the maxilla and retrude the mandible. The patient complied well with RME and facemask therapy, resulting in significant improvement in the skeletal and dental relationship (Fig.
The patient initially experienced discomfort and irritation from the poorly adapted chin cup of the facemask. Compliance with the prescribed wear schedule (14–16 hours/day) was suboptimal due to these issues.
1. The chin area was carefully examined to assess its contours and identify potential pressure points. 2. An impression of the chin was taken using PVS impression material to capture the precise anatomy of the area. 3. A chin model was constructed using dental stone from the PVS impression. 4. An acrylic chin support was fabricated over the model to provide a customized fit. 5. A separate impression of the stem attachment point was taken to ensure proper integration with the chin cup. 6. An acrylic stem was fabricated and securely attached to the customized chin support. 7. The completed customized chin cup was then tested for fit and adjusted as necessary to ensure patient comfort and appliance stability (Figs
The modified chin cup was provided to the patient after ensuring a snug, comfortable fit. A soft cotton cloth was recommended as an optional protective layer for the skin.
The patient reported significant improvement in comfort and wearability. Skin irritation was eliminated, and compliance with the recommended wear schedule improved to over 95%. Follow-up assessments showed no adverse reactions, and the patient expressed satisfaction with the modified appliance. Fixed appliance therapy with MBT prescription (0.022” slot) was initiated on the upper arch to achieve leveling and alignment.
Class III malocclusion presents significant treatment challenges, particularly in growing patients, due to its impact on both functional and esthetic aspects. Patients may experience difficulties in mastication, speech, and overall facial harmony, which can lead to psychosocial stress and reduced quality of life.[
The customization of chin cups using PVS offers a practical solution to this problem. The described technique not only improves the fit and comfort of the chin cup but also enhances overall appliance stability, supporting better compliance. The use of PVS is particularly advantageous due to its biocompatibility, ease of use, and availability in most orthodontic practices. When used for taking impressions of the chin in the fabrication of customized chin cups, PVS offers several advantages compared to other impression materials such as alginate due to its superior accuracy and detailed reproduction, exceptional dimensional stability, tear resistance, high degree of elastic recovery, controlled setting time, and improved patient comfort. Moreover, unlike alginate, which must be poured immediately to avoid distortion, PVS allows multiple stone casts to be made from a single impression. This is particularly useful in cases where adjustments or refinements to the chin cup design are needed.
This customization technique addresses the limitations of prefabricated facemask chin cups by enhancing their fit and comfort, thus supporting improved dentoskeletal outcomes. The modified approach facilitates forward maxillary movement while minimizing discomfort, ultimately enabling better compliance. The integration of RME with facemask therapy allows for effective skeletal correction, while the customized chin cup improves treatment adherence, ensuring more predictable and favorable results in managing Class III malocclusion. The forward movement of the maxilla, achieved through a combination of RME and facemask therapy, effectively corrects the skeletal discrepancy, while secondary interventions such as fixed appliance therapy ensure optimal dental alignment and occlusion.
Class III malocclusion is particularly complex due to its variability in presentation. Some cases involve mandibular prognathism, maxillary retrusion, or a combination of both, necessitating individualized treatment approaches. [
By enhancing patient comfort and compliance, this technique may also support treatment in younger patients with mixed dentition or those with special needs. Integrating these customizations into standard orthodontic practice has the potential to improve outcomes across a variety of treatment modalities. The integration of advanced materials and digital technologies may further enhance the precision and efficacy of customized orthodontic solutions.
This case demonstrates the effectiveness of a straightforward method for customizing chin cups in facemasks used for Class III treatment. By addressing the limitations of prefabricated chin cups, this approach enhances patient comfort, compliance, and treatment outcomes. The customization technique represents a valuable addition to the orthodontic armamentarium, particularly in pediatric cases requiring long-term adherence to treatment protocols.
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
No use of AI was reported.
No funding was reported.
PA: conceptualization, clinical management of the patient; GPM and DS: clinical management of the patient, data collection; HS and RP: literature review, manuscript drafting; SKS: manuscript review and editing, supervision.
The data supporting this case report are included within the article. Additional information cannot be shared due to patient confidentiality and ethical considerations.
The authors sincerely thank the Principal of Chettinad Dental College and Research Institute for the institutional support provided during the preparation of this manuscript.