Review |
Corresponding author: Konstantinos Anagnostopoulos ( kanagno@gmail.com ) © 2022 Charalambos Papadopoulos, Ioannis Tentes, Dimitrios Papazoglou, Konstantinos Anagnostopoulos.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Papadopoulos C, Tentes I, Papazoglou D, Anagnostopoulos K (2022) Lysophospholipid metabolism and signalling in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Folia Medica 64(1): 7-12. https://doi.org/10.3897/folmed.64.e59297
|
Non-alcoholic liver disease (NAFLD) constitutes a global health pandemic. It is estimated that about 25% of the world’s population suffers from NAFLD. In the long-term, a subgroup of the patients can develop inflammation and fibrosis. The end result in some cases is cirrhosis and even liver-related death. The epidemiology and natural history of NAFLD lead to extreme financial costs.
To date, there is no approved treatment for NAFLD. Lipotoxicity has been proposed to be one of the main regulators of the implicated molecular pathomechanisms. Research has been focused on the role of cholesterol, free fatty acids and ceramides. Nevertheless, lysophospholipids, such as sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P), lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC), lysophosphatidic acid (LPA), lysophosphatidylinositol (LPI), lysophosphatidylethanolamine (LPE) have emerged as potential contributors to NAFLD/NASH. Finally, the metabolism of other lysophospholipids, such as lysophosphatidylserine (LPSer), lysophosphatidylglycerol (LPG), and lysocardiolipin (LCL), has come to light in the context of NAFLD. In this review, we try to summarize the current knowledge regarding the potential of lysophospholipid signalling and metabolism as therapeutic targets and biomarkers in NAFLD and/or NASH.
non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, lysophosphatidylcholine, lysophosphatidic acid, lysophospholipids, sphingosine 1-phosphate
The diagnosis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is based upon evidence of hepatic steatosis, either by imaging or by histology after the exclusion of other secondary causes of hepatic fat accumulation such as significant alcohol consumption, use of steatogenic medication and hereditary, autoimmune or viral hepatic disorders. NAFLD is histologically further categorized into non-alcoholic fatty liver (NAFL) defined as the presence of hepatic steatosis with no evidence of hepatocellular injury in the form of ballooning of the hepatocytes, and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) defined as the presence of hepatic steatosis and inflammation with hepatocyte injury (ballooning) with or without fibrosis.[
NAFLD constitutes a global health pandemic affecting about 25% of the world’s population, with the metabolic syndrome being the major risk factor. In addition, a subgroup of NAFLD patients suffers from steatohepatitis (NASH) and/or advanced fibrosis.[
The therapeutics of NAFLD has extremely high financial costs. In the context of growing clinical and quality‐of‐life burden of NAFLD, the economic burden of this important liver disease for the United States and Europe is likely to increase.[
From a pathophysiological point of view, a two-hit hypothesis, based on appearance of steatosis (first hit), followed by a second hit leading to inflammation, hepatocyte damage, and fibrosis, was initially proposed. Recent studies suggest that NASH is the result of numerous conditions acting in parallel, including genetic predisposition, abnormal lipid metabolism, oxidative stress, lipotoxicity, mitochondrial dysfunction, altered production of cytokines and adipokines, gut dysbiosis and endoplasmic reticulum stress.[
Recently, lipotoxicity has been proposed to be one of the main regulators of the implicated molecular pathophysiological mechanisms. Research has focused on the role of cholesterol[
Lysophospholipid signalling in the pathogenesis of NAFLD. ATX: autotaxin; CHOP: C/EBP homologous protein; CL: cardiolipin; JNK: c-jun N-terminal kinase; MCP1: monocyte chemoattractant protein 1; LPA: lysophosphatidic acid; LPC: lysophosphatidylcholine; LCL: lysocardiolipin; LPE: lysophosphatidylethanolamine; LPG: lysophosphatidylglycerol; LPI: lysophosphatidylinositol; LPSer: lysophosphatidylserine; NFkB: nuclear factor kB; PG: phosphatidylglycerol; PPARγ: peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ; PUMA: P53 upregulated modulator of apoptosis; ROCK1: Rho associated protein kinase 1; SREBP-1c: sterol regulatory element protein 1c; S1PR1: sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor 1; S1PR3: sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor 3; S1P: sphingosine 1-phosphate; TNF-α: tumor necrosis factor α. This figure was created using Servier Medical Art templates, which are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License; https://smart.servier.com.
Sphingosine is released from ceramide through the action of sphingomyelinase. Then, 1-sphingosine phosphate (S1P) is formed by the phosphorylation of sphingosine by the remaining kinase located in the cytoplasm and the endoplasmic reticulum of various cell types. S1P can be dephosphorylated by sphingosine phosphatase, and, in addition, the action of S1P lyase degrades it irreversibly. S1P binds to sphingosine 1-phosphate receptors (S1PR)- 1,2,3,4,5, which mobilize G proteins. The binding of S1P to its receptors can lead to the activation of multiple signalling pathways.[
S1P is increased in experimental animals with NASH. Synthesis of S1P in hepatocytes is induced by palmitate-induced endoplasmic reticulum stress. S1P, after being secreted to the extracellular milieu, binds to its receptor S1PR1, resulting in its activation. This leads to the activation of NFKβ and the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) and monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP1). Experimental animals deficient in sphingosine kinase did not develop NASH. At the same time, the siRNA-mediated targeted knock down of S1P1 prevented the expression of TNF-α and MCP-1 in HEPG2 cells.[
It has also been found that induction of non-alcoholic liver disease by palmitate and subsequent S1P release into the extracellular space by hepatocyte activates the S1PR2 of hepatocytes inducing insulin resistance[
Finally, in the nucleus, S1P binds to and inhibits HDAC, thus inducing activation of transcription of various genes, such as genes whose protein products are nuclear (cytoplasmic) receptors like PPRAγ, but also lipid metabolism enzymes.[
Han et al.[
LPC is actively involved in additional NASH pathogenetic mechanisms. It seems that through Ras-homologue-associated, coiled-coil containing protein kinase 1 (ROCK1) leads to the production of extracellular vesicles, which are rich in the apoptotic molecule TRAIL, inducing activation of macrophages.[
Lysophosphatidic acid is a bioactive lipid. It acts by binding to heterotrimeric G protein-coupled receptors. To date, five LPA receptors, LPA1-5, have been identified. Depending on the receptor activated, different G proteins are mobilized, and therefore different signalling pathways are activated. The result at the cellular level may be cell survival, proliferation, motility, etc.[
NAFLD resolution was associated with a decrease in plasma LPE to PE ratio and lower phospholipase A2 with PE to LPE conversion activity.[
LPI exerts its functions through binding to its receptor GPR55.[
The levels of LPSer and its potential in NAFLD have not been studied so far. Nevertheless, Uranbileg et al.[
Zhang et al.[
Lysocardiolipin metabolism has been studied extensively in a study by Wang et al.[
It is obvious that both ALCAT1 and LPGAT1 converge on the same molecular mechanisms. Hence, it could be convincing that the metabolism of LPG and LCL controls NAFLD pathogenesis through cardiolipin remodelling; cardiolipin, due to its unique chemical composition, is implicated in oxidative phosphorylation[
The aforementioned studies imply that lysophospholipids contribute to the development of hepatic steatosis, inflammation, fibrosis and insulin resistance, but there are certainly various limitations. In particular, substantial experimental works with knock-down animals and other interventions targeting the synthesis and/or action of sphingosine 1-phosphate indicate that there could exist a therapeutic potential for NAFLD. However, the translation of these findings in the clinical settings remains to be elucidated. Furthermore, preliminary studies regarding the role of LPC, LPA, LPE, LPI, LPG, and LPSer imply their potential in NAFLD. Since these lipids have important signalling ability[
The research work was supported by the Hellenic Foundation for Research and Innovation (HFRI) under the HFRI PhD Fellowship grant (Fellowship Number: 1343).
Funding
The authors have no funding and no support to report.
Competing interests
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.