Case Report |
Corresponding author: Ivan Ivanov ( ivan.ivanov.dmd@gmail.com ) © 2022 Ivan Ivanov, Antoaneta Mlachkova.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Ivanov I, Mlachkova A (2022) Surgical treatment of endo-periodontal lesion – а case report. Folia Medica 64(6): 985-990. https://doi.org/10.3897/folmed.64.e68427
|
The interrelationship between periodontium and pulp makes the treatment of combined endo-periodontal lesions (EPL) more challenging. It involves successful elimination of both periodontal and endodontic lesion. The current case report represents the efficacy of regenerative potential of enamel matrix derivates (Emdogain®) in endo-periodontal lesion after successful endodontic treatment. A 39-year-old woman presented with EPL on a left first mandibular molar. After the initial 3 months of healing, the clinical examination showed that the furcation involvement still prevailed. A decision was made to use a regenerative procedure using Emdogain®. Fourteen months after the procedure, full periodontal regeneration can be seen on the X-ray. The results demonstrated the synergetic effect of the endodontic and periodontal therapy that changed the prognosis for the tooth.
Emdogain, endodontic lesion, furcation involvement, periodontal therapy, periodontal regeneration
The relationship between periodontium and the pulp has been well addressed. The embryonic, anatomical, and functional interrelationships are defined by the dentinal tubules, lateral and accessory canals, and apical foramen and they might be assumed for the combined problems responsible for more than 50% of tooth mortality.[
A 39-year-old woman complained of swallowing and pain around tooth #36 associated with pus discharge for 2 weeks. At the first visit, the existing crown of the tooth was removed and systemic antimicrobial therapy (amoxicillin 750 mg) was administered for seven days. During the detailed clinical examination after 1 week, the buccal furcation of tooth #36 presented with a 5-mm horizontal pocket with Naber’s probe (PPD=5 mm) and vertical probing was measured with UNC 15 probe – 4 mm, while the lingual furcation was not probable (PPD=1 mm). Mesially and distally to the tooth, there was no clinical attachment loss.
The level of oral hygiene was measured using the following indexes: full mouth plaque score = 14.29% and full mouth bleeding score = 10.71%.
The radiographic assessment demonstrated periapical endodontic lesion of tooth #36 and furcation lesion (Fig.
The diagnosis was made by the presence of periapical endodontic lesion and grade II furcation involvement and a communication between them. The final diagnosis was endodontic-periodontal lesion and the differential diagnosis was sinus tract and root fracture of tooth #36.
Treatment planning was done taking into consideration that the tooth presented with combined endo-periodontal lesion, grade II vestibular furcation involvement on a mandibular tooth. The endodontic treatment was performed first (Fig.
After anesthetizing with local anesthesia: ubistesin 4% with adrenaline 1:200 000, a full thickness flap was reflected (Fig.
The patient was advised for proper plaque control using ultra soft toothbrush and prescribed 0.12% chlorhexidine mouthwash for rinsing twice daily for 2 weeks.
The patient was scheduled to have a regular recall each 3 months. After 7 months, the probing depth was 3 mm with UNC 15 probe. The first post-op radiograph after 7 months (Fig.
Endo-periodontal lesions (EPL) can develop by the extension of either the periodontal destruction apically combining at the same time with an existing apical periapical lesion or with non-existing apical lesion. According to the new proposed classification of the periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions[
In the current case report, 3 months after the endodontic treatment, the lesion was still present and the tooth was asymptomatic. After this period, the tooth was radiographically evaluated and clinical parameters such as horizontal probing depth with Naber’s probe did not improve. The clinical examination, together with the X-ray and particularly CBCT confirmed a secondary periodontal involvement together with primary endodontic lesion. The regenerative periodontal procedure was done taking into consideration that the tooth presented combined endo-periodontal lesion, grade II furcation involvement and the regenerative protocol was done using enamel matrix derivate and specifically in this case Emdogain®. This material is well studied[
Navanoti et al.[
For the purpose of resolving similar periodontal lesion, Narung et al.[
More recent approach[
The correct definitive diagnosis is the key factor for the accurate treatment modality of endo-periodontal lesions. The complete multidisciplinary approach of both aspects of EPL is important for the successful long-term results. In our particular case the results demonstrate the synergetic effect of the endodontic and periodontal therapy that changed the poor prognosis of the tooth.