Original Article |
Corresponding author: Stefka Stoilova ( ef_i@abv.bg ) © 2023 Stefka Stoilova, Mariela Geneva-Popova, Daniela Taneva.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Stoilova S, Geneva-Popova M, Taneva D (2023) Accessibility to and awareness of rheumatology care provided by a nurse - a pilot study. Folia Medica 65(2): 235-242. https://doi.org/10.3897/folmed.65.e79717
|
Introduction: Good medical care depends both on the access to specialists and awareness of patients and healthcare professionals.
Aim: The purpose of this study was to assess the accessibility to rheumatology outpatient care and the awareness of patients with inflammatory joint diseases with regard to the types of sources and preferences of sources for obtaining information related to their disease and treatment, as well as to establish the extent to which this information is useful to patients.
Materials and methods: A pilot, cross-sectional, single center, anonymous study was conducted among adult patients with inflammatory joint diseases who were monitored in an outpatient rheumatology room at St George Diagnostic and Consultative Center in Plovdiv. A total of 56 patients were monitored. The questionnaire contained 56 questions, divided into 5 main groups: 1. questions about the disease, 2. questions about the sociodemographic profile of the patients, 3. questions about accessibility to specialized healthcare, 4. questions about the role of the nurse in the training of patients with inflammatory joint disease, and 5. questions evaluating the attitude to the monitoring medical team. The data were analyzed with IBM SPSS V.26, at a statistical significance level of p<0.05 for all analyses.
Results: Women predominated among the patients under observation (37, 66%), as well as patients in the age group of 50-79 years (46, 82%). Twenty-four (42.9%) were the patients attending the consulting room twice a year. On-the-spot booking in the consulting room was preferred mainly among patients who lived within 50 km (3/16, 19%), while the rest of the patients preferred booking appointments by phone. Forty-five (80%) patients of the total number of patients used subcutaneous biological agents. Among them, the patients whose first application was performed by a nurse in a rheumatology room predominated (44 patients, 96%). All respondents (56, 100%) indicated that they had received self-injection training from a healthcare professional.
Conclusion: Patients with inflammatory joint diseases need information to help them manage issues related to their disease and treatment, as well as cope with their physical and psychological needs. Our study shows that patients most commonly use a combination of information sources – they get information from a doctor or from a healthcare professional, i.e. a nurse. We highlighted in the study the crucial role of nurses in improving the access of patients to specialized rheumatology care and satisfying patients’ information needs.
medical care, outpatient practice, patients, preferences
Good medical care depends both on access to specialists and awareness of patients and healthcare professionals.[
Inflammatory joint diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) are chronic inflammatory autoimmune diseases that are characterized by inflammation, pain, and stiffness of the joints; they can affect the muscles, bones, and organs of the body. Advanced options for treating these diseases, including antirheumatic drugs, biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and therapeutic strategies, such as ‘treat-to-target’, increase the need for patients to have access to healthcare professionals.[
The aim of this study was to assess the accessibility to rheumatology outpatient care and the awareness of patients with inflammatory joint diseases of the types of sources and preferences of sources for obtaining information related to their disease and treatment, as well as to establish the extent to which this information is useful to patients.
A pilot, cross-sectional, single center, anonymous study was conducted among adult patients with inflammatory joint diseases who were monitored in the outpatient rheumatology room at St George Diagnostic and Consultative Center in Plovdiv. Fifty-six patients were monitored, of them 37 (66%) were female and 19 (34%) were male. The patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were 36 (64.3%), with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) – 13 (23.2%), and with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) – 7 (12.5%). A questionnaire drawn up based on expert opinions of healthcare professionals was used. The entire questionnaire contained 56 questions, divided into 5 main groups: 1. questions about the disease, 2. questions about the sociodemographic profile of the patients, 3. questions about accessibility to specialized healthcare, 4. questions about the role of the nurse in the training of the patient with inflammatory joint disease, and 5. questions evaluating the attitude to the monitoring medical team.
Fifty-six patients meeting the criteria voluntarily completed informed consent forms. They were rated by age, sex, level of education, social status, residential remoteness from a rheumatology room, type of disease, family history, duration of disease, and frequency of annual visits to rheumatologists. The data were analyzed using IBM SPSS V.26, at a statistical significance level of p<0.05 for all analyses.
Women predominated among the patients under observation (37, 66 %), as well as patients in the age group 50-79 years (46, 82%). The majority of patients were retired (34, 61%), with at least secondary education (43, 77%) (Table
A statistically significant relationship was found between the remoteness of the patients and the preferred method for booking an appointment (χ2=4.55, p=0.03), which was by phone.
Twenty-four (42.9%) were the patients who attended the consulting room twice a year. Of these, 6 (10.9%) lived within 50 km of the location of the rheumatology room, and 18 (32%) lived at a distance greater than 50 km from it. The same relationship was observed in patients who visited the rheumatology room thrice or more than thrice a year: 32 (57%) in total, of them 12 (21.4%) lived within 50 km from the rheumatology room, and 20 (35.7%) lived at a distance more than 50 km (Table
Forty-two (75%) patients in the study group were regular visitors to the rheumatology room for more than 5 years, 11 (19.6%) were the patients who attended the practice for a period between 1 and 5 years, and the remaining 3 (5.4%) patients had a duration of visits to the rheumatology room up to 1 year (Fig.
On-the-spot booking in the consulting room was preferred mainly among patients who lived within 50 km (3/16; 19%), while the rest of the patients preferred booking appointments by phone. Without exception, the patients denied difficulties in booking an appointment.
54 (96%) patients answered affirmatively the question: ’Does communication with the nurse help you book your regular visits with a specialist in connection with your illness?’, and only 2 (4%) patients replied ‘I can’t decide’. The question: ‘Does meeting the nurse give you a sense of accessibility, security, and satisfaction with the care provided?’ was answered positively by 56 (100%) patients.
Forty-five (80%) patients used subcutaneous biological agents. The majority of them (44 patients, 96%) had their first application performed by a nurse in a rheumatology room. All respondents (56, 100%) indicated that they had received self-injection training from a healthcare professional.
Thirty (67%) patients did not identify the specialist physician as a leading figure in the self-injection training. In contrast, the role of the nurse was recognized among all patients with this method of application (56 patients, 100%) (Fig.
A significant part of the patients (49, 87%) stated that they would attend the surveyed outpatient practice even if there was another specialized consulting room located in greater proximity to the patient’s place of residence, and only 7 (12%) of the patient responded evasively with: ‘I can’t decide’.
To a greater extent, patients preferred to receive additional information on the drug therapy from a specialist physician (41 patients, 73.2%) versus a nurse (15 patients, 26.8%) (p<0.01), and 24 (42%) patients did not mind being informed by both participants in the medical team. The majority of the patients (53 patients, 95%), found the healthcare professional sufficiently competent to provide the necessary information.
Thirty-three (58%) patients expressed the opinion that they received sufficient information on their drug therapy from the team in charge, i.e. the doctor and the nurse. Fifty-five (98%) patients declared satisfaction with spending enough time in the consulting room. Fifty-five (98%) of the patients expressed satisfaction with the information on their disease provided by a nurse and only 1 patient (2%) did not share the same opinion. Regarding the information about the type and nature of the necessary tests as well as the information on drug therapy that was provided in clear, simple language by the nurse, 56 patients (100%) responded affirmatively (Fig.
Variable | N | % |
Sex | ||
Women | 37 | 66.1 |
Men | 19 | 33.9 |
Age group | ||
30-49 years | 8 | |
50-79 years | 46 | 37 |
Above 79 years | 2 | 3.6 |
Education | ||
Primary | 13 | 23.2 |
Secondary | 38 | 67.9 |
Higher school | 5 | 8.9 |
Social status | ||
Working | 22 | 39.3 |
Retired | 34 | 60.7 |
Remoteness from the rheumatology room | ||
Up to 50 km | 16 | 28.6 |
At or above 50 km | 40 | 71.4 |
Type of disease | ||
Rheumatoid arthritis | 36 | 64.3 |
Psoriatic arthritis | 13 | 23.2 |
Ankylosing spondylitis | 7 | 12.5 |
Family history | ||
Yes | 6 | 10.7 |
No | 44 | 78.6 |
I don’t know | 6 | 10.7 |
Duration of follow-up | ||
1 month to 1 year | 3 | 5.4 |
1 year to 5 years | 11 | 19.6 |
Over 5 years | 42 | 75.0 |
Frequency of visits, annually | ||
Up to 2 times | 24 | 42.9 |
3 times | 12 | 21.4 |
More than 3 times | 20 | 35.7 |
Number of visits in relation to the remoteness of residence from a rheumatology room (up to 50 km and over 50 km)
Annual visits – 2 times: 24 (42.9%) | Annual visits – 3 and more times: 32 (57%) | |
Remoteness up to 50 km | 6 (25%) | 12 (37.5%) |
Remoteness >50 km | 18 (75%) | 20 (62.5%) |
This is a pilot study, which will be expanded in the future as a prospective study to include additional questions in order to prove the overall role of the nurse in the specialized outpatient practice in managing the disease of patients with inflammatory joint diseases (rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis). Our study gives an idea of the access to specialized rheumatology care, as well as of the type, sufficiency, and satisfaction of the information received from patients with inflammatory joint diseases in specialized outpatient practices. The main objective of the study was to demonstrate the need and benefit of the information provided to patients with inflammatory joint diseases in order to meet their demands, both health ones – related to the disease and its treatment – and purely informational ones. What is emphasized in the study is the crucial role of the nurse in providing patients with access to specialized rheumatology care. The availability and provision of access and awareness of patients aim at increasing the satisfaction of healthcare users, as well as highlighting the adequate competence of the nurse in the specialized rheumatology room. The main age group in the present study was between 50 and 79 years (46 patients, 82.1%), which determined the standard choice for booking an appointment, by phone or in person at the reception desk, and no other possible source was indicated by any of the respondents. The specificities of the age group surveyed clarify the reasons for the lack of interest in using modern technological means when booking an appointment, such as the Internet and specialized applications such as the digital health platform Healee, applicable for the practice surveyed.
A large-scale Australian study (2015-2017) applied an access and triage model with specific timely triage appointments, the specific timely appointments for triage (STAT), to improve patient flow and showed a significant reduction in waiting times for various services.[
The large number of patients attending a rheumatology room located at a distance of more than 50 km shows that distance cannot be an obstacle to the number of visits and thus remoteness is not a factor to limit the visits and, accordingly, a lack of monitoring and control of the disease by the medical team. A good part of the patients (11, 19.6%) had been attending the practice for a period between 1 and 5 years, which is indicative of a constancy in the established tradition of adherence of patients to the care provided by the medical team, and for the rest of the patients (3 patients, 5.4%) with duration of visits to the rheumatology room up to 1 year, it can be assumed that the same principle of work would be followed by the team and the same results would be expected.
To the main question illustrating the key role of the nurse in providing accessible rheumatology care: ’Does communication with the nurse help you book your regular visits with a specialist in connection with your illness?’, 54 (96%) of the participants responded positively. To the question: ‘Does meeting the nurse give you a sense of accessibility, security, and satisfaction with the care provided?’ 56 patients (100%) responded affirmatively.
The positive attitude of patients is based on the well-developed communication skills of the nurse, as she is the first member of the team who comes into contact with them and organizes the regular visits of patients. To the patients with inflammatory joint diseases, the nurse in a rheumatology room appears to be the first level of access to specialized health care, she is the first to communicate with them through direct contact or other means. A summary of this relationship of trust between the nurse and the patients is reflected in the positive attitudes revealed in the answers to the question: ‘Have you received psychological and emotional support in the rheumatology room?‘ which was answered in the positive by 55 (98%) patients, and ‘Are you satisfied with the speed and expedience of the processing of documents related to your treatment?‘ to which 56 (100%) patients answered affirmatively, and the next question follows naturally: ‘In general, are you satisfied with the care provided by the nurse?‘ answered positively by 56 (100%) respondents. The nurse’s organizational skills in facilitating the access to rheumatology care are supported by all the respondents (56, 100%) who answered affirmatively to the question: ‘Are you informed of the periodicity of your visits to the rheumatology room?’ These answers once again highlight the need to coordinate the activities planned – something that the nurse does systematically in her day-to-day activities.
A large number of the patients (49 patients, 87%) stated that they would attend the outpatient practice subject to the study even if there was another specialized consulting room located in greater proximity to the patient’s place of residence. Rejecting the opportunity for greater convenience, i.e. a closer consulting room, in favor of real appointment with the monitoring medical team, is an expression of a strong psycho-emotional connection expressed in absolute terms by preferring a particular medical team. Only 7 patients (12%) responded evasively, ‘I can’t decide’, which shows doubt in the likelihood that they might be more satisfied with the care offered locally compared to the quality of service they are already familiar with.
Ensuring adequate and timely access to rheumatologists of patients with inflammatory joint diseases, as well as providing sufficient information about their disease and treatment by using modern means and the essential help of a nurse, lead to significant benefits for the patients, i.e. monitoring and follow-up of inflammatory joint diseases in order to prevent the disability of patients and increase their quality of life.
The spread of rheumatic diseases poses a growing challenge to the health system. Being the leading cause of disability, rheumatic diseases generate a significant flow of increasing needs among the population. The factors that limit the access of those in need of specialized rheumatology care can be demographic, social, economic, psychological, and cultural. The informative role of the nurse in a specialized rheumatology room finds expression in the strive to increase the level of awareness of patients about their rheumatic diseases, treatment, and related side effects, as well as to overcome the problems associated with the access to high-quality specialized care and to educate the patients in order to help them better cope with their rheumatic disease.
The study shows that from all the information channels provided, doctors remain the most trusted source of information for the patients, followed by nurses as part of the medical team. Providing quality care for patients with inflammatory joint diseases starts by satisfying their information needs through standard, familiar sources, i.e. through doctors and nurses. In addition, it should be noted that the skills and competencies of the nurse to provide personalized, clear, and comprehensible information to patients are grounds for the organization of and conducting timely and regulated access to outpatient rheumatology services. Providing the necessary specialized information to patients with inflammatory joint diseases who receive biological therapy is challenging, since their condition often requires frequent follow-ups for which they need further clarification.
Patients with inflammatory joint diseases need information to help them manage issues related to their disease and treatment, as well as cope with their physical and psychological needs. Our study shows that patients use most commonly a combination of information sources – they get information from a doctor or from a healthcare professional, i.e. a nurse. What is highlighted in the study is the crucial role of nurses in improving the access of patients to specialized rheumatology care and satisfying patients’ information needs.
The authors have no support to report.
The authors have no funding to report.
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.