Original Article |
Corresponding author: Georgi Stoitsev ( georgistoicev@abv.bg ) © 2023 Georgi Stoitsev, Veselin Gavrilov, Valya Goranovska, Georgi Manchev, Vassil Gegouskov.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Stoitsev G, Gavrilov V, Goranovska V, Manchev G, Gegouskov V (2023) Cold modified Del Nido cardioplegia in adults undergoing elective cardiac coronary surgery. Folia Medica 65(5): 760-769. https://doi.org/10.3897/folmed.65.e90286
|
Introduction: The cardioplegic solution of Kirklin (Kn) is frequently used in adult cardiosurgical patients. It requires reinfusion at short intervals, which causes further difficulty during surgery and the quality of myocardial protection is often called into question.
Aim: To demonstrate whether the modified cardioplegia of del Nido (MDN) with a longer period of cardiac arrest provides sufficiently effective and reliable myocardial protection when compared to the classic cardioplegia of Kirklin we use in our institution.
Materials and methods: This ambispective clinical-epidemiological study was conducted in the Department of Heart Surgery at St Anna University Hospital in Sofia between January 2017 and September 2021. Using a random number generator, а hundred and twenty patients were selected and divided into two cohorts of 60 patients each. After further data processing, an additional five patients dropped out of the Kirklin group due to a ‘beating heart’ operative technique. As a result, the groups were divided as follows: 1) intermittent cardioplegia Kirklin (Kn, n=55) used in patients between January 2017 and June 2019, and 2) modified del Nido cardioplegia (MDN, n=60) used from June 2019 to September 2021.
Results: In this study, we present our experience with MDN cardioplegia in patients undergoing isolated CABG and compare it with a group of patients who received Kn cardioplegia. The difference in cross-clamp and CPB times is due to the individual qualities and experience of surgeons. When using MDN, the longer intraoperative times not only showed no deterioration in postoperative results, did not increase the need of using an additional dose of cardioplegia, but also did not materialize in a statistically significant difference. The MDN cardioplegia showed significantly less usage of inotropic support (p<0.001) and IABP (p=0.029). Creatinine phosphokinase MB fraction when patients are admitted to intensive care was significantly less in the Kirklin group (p=0.045).
Conclusions: Results suggest that the routine use of modified cardioplegic protection of del Nido in adult patients may be safe, leads to comparable clinical outcomes and could accelerate the surgical process. The reduced incidence in intra- and postoperative complications like DC shocks, arrhythmia, myocardial infarction, multiorgan failure and in-hospital mortality should be further studied, as it may imply superiority of myocardial protection with the modified solution.
cardiac surgery, cardioprotection, cardioplegia del Nido, modified del Nido cardioplegia
Intraoperative myocardial protection is central to the evolution of cardiosurgery. Numerous studies assess the effectiveness of cardioplegic solutions, but the ultimate cardioprotective strategy and the search for the perfect cardioplegic solution is still on the agenda. In the early 1990s, professor Pedro del Nido and his team from the University of Pittsburgh developed a cardioplegic solution to address the specific needs of immature myocardium often found during neonatal and children’s cardiac surgery. The formula, which we now call del Nido cardioplegia (DN), causes the heart to stop due to muscle depolarization. It is essentially a more diluted solution (1:4, blood:crystalloid) compared to traditional blood cardioplegia solution (4:1). Other characteristics of del Nido solution are the reduced Ca2+ content and the addition of a depolarizing agent, lidocaine.[
Kirklin’s solution is a well-studied crystalloid cardioplegia, administered repeatedly at short intervals during surgery. An increase in myocardial acidosis between cardioplegic doses has been observed adversely affecting the postoperative outcome. It would be useful if the interval between doses can be increased, thereby reducing their total number during surgery. The potential advantage of DN is the fact that it provides a longer period of arrest before a subsequent dose is needed.[
When using a blood vehiculum for classical del Nido cardioplegia, the need for additional inventory arises, and this in turn complicates the operative intervention itself. In our clinic, in order to simplify surgical interventions, we have developed a modified cardioplegic solution based on the electrolyte composition of del Nido, while removing the blood component and replacing it with additional sodium hydrogen carbonate (NaHCO3). The routine use of our modified del Nido cardioplegia has proven its reliability and effectiveness. The concept is built on previous modifications of the solution in which Ringer’s solution is used as the main solvent instead of the traditionally used Plasma-Lyte solution.[
To demonstrate whether the modified cardioplegia of del Nido (DN) with a longer period of cardiac arrest provides sufficiently effective and reliable myocardial protection when compared to the classic cardioplegia of Kirklin we use in our institution.
This ambispective clinical-epidemiological study was conducted in the Department of Heart Surgery at St Anna University Hospital in Sofia between January 2017 and September 2021. Using a random number generator, а hundred and twenty patients were selected and divided into two cohorts of 60 patients each. After further data processing, an additional five patients dropped out of the Kirklin group due to a ‘beating heart’ operative technique. As a result, the groups were divided as follows: 1) intermittent cardioplegia Kirklin (Kn, n=55) used in patients between January 2017 and June 2019, and 2) modified del Nido cardioplegia (MDN, n=60) used from June 2019 to September 2021.
Inclusion criteria
All patients undergoing surgical revascularization due to ischemic heart disease.
Exclusion criteria
1. Patients undergoing complex surgery intervention with a complication of myocardial infarction:
2. All patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) were excluded from the study
3. All patients undergoing ‘beating heart’ surgery
All interventions were performed using a standard protocol of general anesthesia in coronary patients, median sternotomy and cardiopulmonary bypass in systemic normothermia. Myocardial protection was achieved by Kn or MDN cardioplegia as follows: in both groups, the heart was arrested by an induction dose (1 L) cold (4°C) cardioplegia using antegrade delivery. A supplemental dose of cardioplegia was administered into the aortic root and/or through the grafts, with Kn being carried out every 30 minutes. A second dose (500 ml) of MRN was provided only when the clamping time exceeded 50 minutes.
Data were analyzed with the statistical packages IBM SPSS Statistics 25.0 and MedCalc Version 19.6.3, as well as Excel Office 2021. The accepted significance level where null hypothesis is rejected was p<0.05.
The following methods were applied:
1. Descriptive analysis – the frequency distribution of the variables under consideration.
2. Graphical analysis – for results visualization.
3. Comparing of relative shares.
4. Fisher’s exact test, Fisher-Freeman-Halton exact test and χ2 – checking the hypotheses about the presence of dependence between categorical variables.
5. Non-parametric test of Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk – to check the normality distribution.
6. Student’s t-test – for testing hypotheses of difference between means of two independent samples.
7. Non-parametric Mann-Whitney test – for testing hypotheses of difference between two independent samples.
8. Student’s t-test – for testing hypotheses of difference between means of two dependent samples.
9. Non-parametric Wilcoxon test – for testing hypotheses of difference between two dependent samples.
10. Regression analysis – to test hypotheses for the presence of dependence between quantitative signs and choice of mathematical model.
11. Friedman’s non-parametric test – for testing hypotheses of difference between several dependent samples.
12. Multiple linear regression analysis – to test hypotheses for the presence of dependence of one quantitative characteristic on several other characteristics.
Participants in the study had a mean age of 64.16±9.15 years (range between 40 and 81 years). Of these, 79 (68.7%) were male and 36 (31.3%) female.
The age group with the largest number (31) of men was 60-69 years, followed by the groups of 50-59 and 70-79 years each with 20 participants, and 80-81 years – 1 patient. Among women with the largest number (17) was the age group 60-69 years, followed by 70-79 years with 17, and 40-49 years – 1 patient.
For the purposes of the present study, patients were allocated to two treatment groups:
Classic cardioplegia (Kirklin) – n=55 (47.8%) and
Modified cardioplegia (MDN) – n=60 (52.2%).
It can be seen in Table
Regarding the investigated quantitative preoperative characteristics (Table
The comparative analysis of the therapeutic groups based on the investigated preoperative characteristics found that (Table
Index | Total | Kirklin | MDN | P | |||
X̅ | SD | X̅ | SD | X̅ | SD | ||
Age (years) | 64.16 | 9.15 | 65.47 | 8.93 | 62.95 | 9.25 | 0.140 |
BMI (kg/m2) | 28.95 | 5.18 | 28.17 | 4.98 | 29.67 | 5.29 | 0.121 |
n | % | n | % | n | % | ||
Gender | 0.548 | ||||||
Men | 79 | 68.7 | 36 | 65.5 | 43 | 71.7 | |
Women | 36 | 31.3 | 19 | 34.5 | 17 | 28.3 |
Comparative analysis of treatment groups by exploratory quantitative preoperative characteristics
Index | Kirklin | MDN | P | ||||
n | X̅ | SD | n | X̅ | SD | ||
Euroscore (%) | 51 | 4.57 | 3.85 | 60 | 5.16 | 4.68 | 0.929 |
Hemoglobin (g/l) | 55 | 137.93 | 16.18 | 60 | 137.73 | 18.47 | 0.953 |
Erythrocytes (g/l) | 55 | 4.63 | 0.61 | 60 | 4.69 | 0.56 | 0.569 |
Creatinine (µmol/1) | 51 | 108.78 | 32.21 | 57 | 94.81 | 22.57 | 0.011 |
CrCJ (ml/min) | 54 | 67.26 | 28.41 | 60 | 83.67 | 35.02 | 0.007 |
CPK (U/l) | 51 | 135.22 | 104.78 | 58 | 131.87 | 79.84 | 0.540 |
MB (U/l) | 51 | 20.02 | 13.21 | 57 | 19.77 | 12.27 | 0.626 |
LVEF (%) | 55 | 50.33 | 8.68 | 60 | 53.33 | 9.31 | 0.050 |
HLV (mm) | 55 | 9.62 | 6.04 | 60 | 9.32 | 6.19 | 0.735 |
Comparative analysis of the therapeutic groups according to the studied categorical preoperative characteristics
Index | Kirklin | MDN | P | ||
n | % | n | % | ||
DM | 27 | 49.1 | 34 | 56.7 | 0.458 |
Acute myocardial infarction | 9 | 16.4 | 6 | 10.0 | |
Myocardial infarction | 19 | 34.5 | 15 | 25.0 | |
Stroke | 7 | 12.7 | 3 | 5.0 | 0.190 |
Preoperative AF | 9 | 16.4 | 2 | 3.3 | 0.025 |
Balloon dilatation/stent | 12 | 21.8 | 11 | 18.3 | 0.650 |
CKD | 8 | 14.5 | 5 | 8.3 | 0.381 |
Mitral insufficiency | 26 | 47.3 | 24 | 40.0 | 0.457 |
Pulmonary hypertension | 7 | 12.7 | 4 | 6.7 | 0.348 |
SCTLCA | 23 | 41.8 | 19 | 31.7 | 0.333 |
The comparative analysis of the therapeutic groups according to the investigated intra- and postoperative characteristics found that (Table
Regarding the studied quantitative intra- and postoperative characteristics (Table
Comparative analysis of the therapeutic groups according to the investigated categorical intra- and postoperative characteristics
Index | Kirklin | MDN | p | ||
n | % | n | % | ||
DC shocks | 9 | 16.4 | 5 | 8.3 | 0.256 |
Additional cardioplegia | 33 | 60.0 | 29 | 48.3 | 0.262 |
Inotropic support | <0.001 | ||||
Without | 9 | 16.4 | 31 | 51.7 | |
Medium dosage * | 30 | 54.5 | 22 | 36.7 | |
High dosage ** | 16 | 29.1 | 7 | 11.7 | |
IABP usage | 12 | 21.8 | 4 | 6.7 | 0.029 |
NAF | 3 | 5.5 | 1 | 1.7 | 0.348 |
NMI | 4 | 7.3 | 2 | 3.3 | 0.424 |
Mortality | 5 | 9.1 | 2 | 3.3 | 0.257 |
Comparative analysis of the therapeutic groups according to the investigated quantitative intra- and postoperative characteristics
Index | Kirklin | MDN | P | ||||
n | X̅ | SD | n | X̅ | SD | ||
CPKO (U/l) | 52 | 579.04 | 296.64 | 57 | 654.98 | 284.42 | 0.089 |
MBQ (U/l) | 52 | 62.75 | 32.06 | 58 | 67.64 | 16.40 | 0.045 |
CPK24 (U/l) | 52 | 1040.31 | 701.14 | 58 | 1033.40 | 727.08 | 0.808 |
MB24 (U/l) | 51 | 59.39 | 53.51 | 58 | 63.45 | 45.41 | 0.251 |
CrCI post (ml/min) | 55 | 63.10 | 24.03 | 60 | 72.45 | 30.86 | 0.074 |
Cr. post (µmol/1) | 55 | 133.95 | 123.76 | 60 | 117.88 | 41.81 | 0.769 |
CCT (min) | 55 | 47.76 | 11.60 | 60 | 59.75 | 13.13 | <0.001 |
CPB (min) | 55 | 101.56 | 45.49 | 58 | 101.95 | 25.29 | 0.073 |
NDA (n) | 55 | 2.82 | 0.70 | 60 | 2.73 | 0.61 | 0.639 |
ICU stay (days) | 52 | 3.75 | 1.79 | 59 | 3.64 | 1.88 | 0.726 |
Hospital stay (days) | 52 | 11.46 | 3.64 | 59 | 11.61 | 4.25 | 0.169 |
After elimination of extreme values, a multiple linear regression analysis (backward procedure) was conducted showing that there was a significant dependency (R2=0.303, p=0.002) of MB24 on the studied predictive factors, which in step 1 is described by a regression equation with the following parameters:
MB24 = −15.782 − 0.183 MB + 0.862 MB0 + 0.353 CCT
where MB24 is the MB fraction at 24 hours after ICU admission, MB is the preoperative MB fraction, MB0 is the MB fraction after ICU admission, and CCT – cross clamping time.
From the standardized coefficients β (Table
Regression coefficients of the multiple regression model between MB24 and the investigated predictive factors, classic cardioplegia
Stage | Predictors | Unstandardized coefficients | Standardized coefficients | P | |
β | Std. Error | β | |||
1 | Constant | −15.782 | 23.231 | 0.501 | |
MB | −0.183 | 0.402 | −0.061 | 0.651 | |
MB0 | 0.862 | 0.224 | 0.527 | <0.001 | |
CCT | 0.353 | 0.423 | 0.111 | 0.409 |
The coefficient of determination (R2) value of 0.303 means that according to the research model the three indicators determine about 30% of the variations of MB24. The moderate strength of the pattern is also observed in the scatter plot between the actual and predicted values of MB24 (Fig.
After eliminating the extreme values of MB24, a multiple linear regression analysis (backward procedure) was conducted and it showed that there was a significant dependency (R2=0.144, p=0.021) of MB24 on the studied predictive factors, which in step 2 was described by a regression equation with the following parameters (MB is dropped):
MB24 = 1.781 − 0.088 MB0 + 1.002 CCT
where MB24 is the MB fraction at 24 hours after ICU admission, MB0 is the MB fraction after ICU admission, and CCT – cross clamp time.
From the standardized coefficients β (Table
Regression coefficients of the multiple regression model between MB24 and the investigated predictive factors, MDN
Stage | Predictors | Unstandardized coefficients | Standardized coefficients | P | |
β | Std. Error | β | |||
2 | Constant | 1.781 | 24.385 | 0.942 | |
MB0 | −0.088 | 0.281 | −0.043 | 0.754 |
The obtained values of the unstandardized coefficients provide the following information:
The coefficient of determination (R2) value of 0.144 means that according to the research model, the two indicators determine about 14% of the variations of MB24. The small power of the model is also observed in the diagram between the actual and predicted values of MB24 (Fig.
The regression analysis found that of the built-in statistics package in IBM SPSS Statistics 25.0 (eleven models) the relationship between pre- and postoperative creatinine clearance is best described by an exponential equation (R2=0.834, p<0.001):
CrCl post = 1.759 CrCl 0.850
where CrCl post is the postoperative creatinine clearance and CrCl is the preoperative one. The curve of the equation increases permanently at an angle of about 45°. The value of the coefficient of determination R2 shows that about 83% of the variations of the investigated indicator after the operation depend on its preoperative values and the rest (about 17%) – on other factors (Fig.
The regression analysis found that of the built-in statistics package in IBM SPSS Statistics 25.0. (eleven models), the relationship between pre- and postoperative creatinine clearance is best described by an exponential equation (R2=0.856, p<0.001):
CrCl post = 1.518 CrCl 0.872
where CrCl post is the postoperative creatinine clearance and CrCl is the preoperative one. The curve of the equation increases permanently at an angle of about 45°. The value of the coefficient of determination R2 shows that 86% of the variations of the investigated indicator after the operation depend on its preoperative values and the rest (about 14%) – on other factors (Fig.
Cardioplegic solutions play a key role in protecting the heart from myocardial damage during cardiosurgical intervention. The DN solution is successfully used in pediatric cardiac surgery[
These are the main findings of the present study, and they are consistent with earlier studies using DN in adult patients.[
More prospective long-term studies need to be designed to explore the applications of DN cardioplegia and confirm our current findings.
Evidence from this study suggests that the routine adult use of modified cardioplegic protection of del Nido may be safe, leads to comparable clinical outcomes, and accelerates the surgical process. The observed reduced incidence of new onset of postoperative arrhythmia, postoperative myocardial infarction, multiorgan failure and in-hospital mortality should be further studied, as it may imply superiority of myocardial protection with the modified solution. More prospective long-term studies should be designed to study the applications of MDN cardioplegia and confirm our current conclusions.
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
The study was funded by Medical University – Pleven, Project BG05M2OP001-2.009-0031-C01.